The composition of contemporary American and Swedish smokeless tobacco products

Abstract The major components of 70 brands of smokeless tobacco products (STPs) from Sweden and the US were determined to provide greater understanding of the general chemical composition of these products. Various styles of STPs were examined: loose and portion snus from Sweden, and chewing tobacco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin G. McAdam, Harriet Kimpton, Arif Faizi, Andrew Porter, Brad Rodu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-03-01
Series:BMC Chemistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-019-0548-0
_version_ 1819083170480390144
author Kevin G. McAdam
Harriet Kimpton
Arif Faizi
Andrew Porter
Brad Rodu
author_facet Kevin G. McAdam
Harriet Kimpton
Arif Faizi
Andrew Porter
Brad Rodu
author_sort Kevin G. McAdam
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The major components of 70 brands of smokeless tobacco products (STPs) from Sweden and the US were determined to provide greater understanding of the general chemical composition of these products. Various styles of STPs were examined: loose and portion snus from Sweden, and chewing tobacco, dry snuff, moist snuff, hard pellet, soft pellet and plug from the US. The components analysed were major STP components such as water, nicotine, sugars, humectants, sodium ions, chloride ions and ash. The relative quantities of the components varied significantly between different styles of STP. The major component of moist snuff and Swedish loose snus is water. With Swedish portion snus water and pouch material comprise more than half of the product mass; with chewing tobaccos water and sugars comprise around 60% of the products. With these STPs, tobacco was a minor component (30–35%) of the product mass. By way of contrast, tobacco comprised the majority (around 70–90%) of the product mass with dry snuff, hard pellet and soft pellet products. Additives such as sugars, propylene glycol, glycerol, and sodium chloride comprised up to around 12% of the STPs, except for plug and chewing tobaccos where sugars comprised 15–30% by mass of the STP on average. Significant disagreements were found amongst alternative methods of determining water/moisture content for STPs. In particular the oven method, commonly used to determine moisture in tobacco, gave significantly higher values than the Karl Fischer water method when propylene glycol was present. Smaller but similar differences were found using the Near-Infrared method. Choice of measurement technique has important consequences for accuracy of toxicant levels when reporting on a dry-weight basis, a commonly used parameter in smokeless tobacco research and emerging regulatory standards. Conversion to a DWB was also found to produce a preferential bias between and within different STP categories in favour of drier products. These data provide greater understanding of differences in the compositions of contemporary smokeless tobacco products, and demonstrate challenges associated with conversion of actual product contents to dry weight basis values.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T20:28:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-408814a9409f419faa34b646777ab8c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2661-801X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T20:28:19Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Chemistry
spelling doaj.art-408814a9409f419faa34b646777ab8c22022-12-21T18:51:19ZengBMCBMC Chemistry2661-801X2019-03-0113111510.1186/s13065-019-0548-0The composition of contemporary American and Swedish smokeless tobacco productsKevin G. McAdam0Harriet Kimpton1Arif Faizi2Andrew PorterBrad Rodu3British American Tobacco, Group Research and DevelopmentBritish American Tobacco, Group Research and DevelopmentBritish American Tobacco, Group Research and DevelopmentUniversity of LouisvilleAbstract The major components of 70 brands of smokeless tobacco products (STPs) from Sweden and the US were determined to provide greater understanding of the general chemical composition of these products. Various styles of STPs were examined: loose and portion snus from Sweden, and chewing tobacco, dry snuff, moist snuff, hard pellet, soft pellet and plug from the US. The components analysed were major STP components such as water, nicotine, sugars, humectants, sodium ions, chloride ions and ash. The relative quantities of the components varied significantly between different styles of STP. The major component of moist snuff and Swedish loose snus is water. With Swedish portion snus water and pouch material comprise more than half of the product mass; with chewing tobaccos water and sugars comprise around 60% of the products. With these STPs, tobacco was a minor component (30–35%) of the product mass. By way of contrast, tobacco comprised the majority (around 70–90%) of the product mass with dry snuff, hard pellet and soft pellet products. Additives such as sugars, propylene glycol, glycerol, and sodium chloride comprised up to around 12% of the STPs, except for plug and chewing tobaccos where sugars comprised 15–30% by mass of the STP on average. Significant disagreements were found amongst alternative methods of determining water/moisture content for STPs. In particular the oven method, commonly used to determine moisture in tobacco, gave significantly higher values than the Karl Fischer water method when propylene glycol was present. Smaller but similar differences were found using the Near-Infrared method. Choice of measurement technique has important consequences for accuracy of toxicant levels when reporting on a dry-weight basis, a commonly used parameter in smokeless tobacco research and emerging regulatory standards. Conversion to a DWB was also found to produce a preferential bias between and within different STP categories in favour of drier products. These data provide greater understanding of differences in the compositions of contemporary smokeless tobacco products, and demonstrate challenges associated with conversion of actual product contents to dry weight basis values.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-019-0548-0Smokeless tobaccoSnusSnuffWater measurementMoisture content
spellingShingle Kevin G. McAdam
Harriet Kimpton
Arif Faizi
Andrew Porter
Brad Rodu
The composition of contemporary American and Swedish smokeless tobacco products
BMC Chemistry
Smokeless tobacco
Snus
Snuff
Water measurement
Moisture content
title The composition of contemporary American and Swedish smokeless tobacco products
title_full The composition of contemporary American and Swedish smokeless tobacco products
title_fullStr The composition of contemporary American and Swedish smokeless tobacco products
title_full_unstemmed The composition of contemporary American and Swedish smokeless tobacco products
title_short The composition of contemporary American and Swedish smokeless tobacco products
title_sort composition of contemporary american and swedish smokeless tobacco products
topic Smokeless tobacco
Snus
Snuff
Water measurement
Moisture content
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-019-0548-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kevingmcadam thecompositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts
AT harrietkimpton thecompositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts
AT ariffaizi thecompositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts
AT andrewporter thecompositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts
AT bradrodu thecompositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts
AT kevingmcadam compositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts
AT harrietkimpton compositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts
AT ariffaizi compositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts
AT andrewporter compositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts
AT bradrodu compositionofcontemporaryamericanandswedishsmokelesstobaccoproducts