Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening - a Necessity and not a Choice

INTRODUCTION Congenital deafness in a child is often missed. Several distraction tests have evolved over time to diagnose congenital deafness. These are of limited value in the era of Evoked response audiometry. Evoked responses, such as Oto-acoustic emission (OAE) and Brainstem Evoked Response A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saikat Samaddar, Swagatam Banerjee, Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh, Subhra Bhattacharya, Diptanshu Mukherjee, Sirshak Dutta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West Bengal 2015-04-01
Series:Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/29
_version_ 1797284659301711872
author Saikat Samaddar
Swagatam Banerjee
Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh
Subhra Bhattacharya
Diptanshu Mukherjee
Sirshak Dutta
author_facet Saikat Samaddar
Swagatam Banerjee
Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh
Subhra Bhattacharya
Diptanshu Mukherjee
Sirshak Dutta
author_sort Saikat Samaddar
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION Congenital deafness in a child is often missed. Several distraction tests have evolved over time to diagnose congenital deafness. These are of limited value in the era of Evoked response audiometry. Evoked responses, such as Oto-acoustic emission (OAE) and Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA) have played a significant role in early diagnosis of congenital hearing impairment. The study was conducted to compare the result of neonatal hearing screening in high risk and non high risk neonates.   MATERIALS AND METHODS A study was conducted over a time period of three months at a tertiary care institute to screen all live neonates for congenital hearing impairment using OAE and BERA.   RESULT 1182 neonates were screened for hearing impairment. 336 were in High risk group and rest in Non high risk group. Nine neonates turned out to have abnormal BERA result (absence of wave V). Six of them were high risk babies and rest 3 were non high risk.   DISCUSSION 33.33% of congenital deaf population detected by UNHS belong to the Non High Risk group. Studies across the world suggest at least 50% chance of missing out a congenital deaf child if Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening is not practiced.   CONCLUSION In order to ensure that early detection and effective intervention are made on all newborns with hearing impairment, UNHS should be performed. Three stage UNHS protocol using TEOAEs and BERA showed that the implementation of UNHS for congenital childhood hearing loss among all newborns in India feasible and effective.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:51:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4088e9d791ab45e48aaf5965f659a72c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2395-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:51:40Z
publishDate 2015-04-01
publisher The Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West Bengal
record_format Article
series Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
spelling doaj.art-4088e9d791ab45e48aaf5965f659a72c2024-03-02T13:51:22ZengThe Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West BengalBengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery2395-24072015-04-0123110.47210/bjohns.2015.v23i1.29Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening - a Necessity and not a ChoiceSaikat Samaddar0Swagatam Banerjee1Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh2Subhra Bhattacharya3Diptanshu Mukherjee4Sirshak Dutta5Medical College And Hospital, Kolkata.Medical College, KolkataMedical College, KolkataMedical College, KolkataMedical CollegeMedical College, KolkataINTRODUCTION Congenital deafness in a child is often missed. Several distraction tests have evolved over time to diagnose congenital deafness. These are of limited value in the era of Evoked response audiometry. Evoked responses, such as Oto-acoustic emission (OAE) and Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA) have played a significant role in early diagnosis of congenital hearing impairment. The study was conducted to compare the result of neonatal hearing screening in high risk and non high risk neonates.   MATERIALS AND METHODS A study was conducted over a time period of three months at a tertiary care institute to screen all live neonates for congenital hearing impairment using OAE and BERA.   RESULT 1182 neonates were screened for hearing impairment. 336 were in High risk group and rest in Non high risk group. Nine neonates turned out to have abnormal BERA result (absence of wave V). Six of them were high risk babies and rest 3 were non high risk.   DISCUSSION 33.33% of congenital deaf population detected by UNHS belong to the Non High Risk group. Studies across the world suggest at least 50% chance of missing out a congenital deaf child if Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening is not practiced.   CONCLUSION In order to ensure that early detection and effective intervention are made on all newborns with hearing impairment, UNHS should be performed. Three stage UNHS protocol using TEOAEs and BERA showed that the implementation of UNHS for congenital childhood hearing loss among all newborns in India feasible and effective.https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/29DeafnessInfantNewbornHearing TestsEvoked PotentialsAuditory
spellingShingle Saikat Samaddar
Swagatam Banerjee
Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh
Subhra Bhattacharya
Diptanshu Mukherjee
Sirshak Dutta
Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening - a Necessity and not a Choice
Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
Deafness
Infant
Newborn
Hearing Tests
Evoked Potentials
Auditory
title Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening - a Necessity and not a Choice
title_full Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening - a Necessity and not a Choice
title_fullStr Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening - a Necessity and not a Choice
title_full_unstemmed Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening - a Necessity and not a Choice
title_short Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening - a Necessity and not a Choice
title_sort universal neonatal hearing screening a necessity and not a choice
topic Deafness
Infant
Newborn
Hearing Tests
Evoked Potentials
Auditory
url https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/29
work_keys_str_mv AT saikatsamaddar universalneonatalhearingscreeninganecessityandnotachoice
AT swagatambanerjee universalneonatalhearingscreeninganecessityandnotachoice
AT sanjoykumarghosh universalneonatalhearingscreeninganecessityandnotachoice
AT subhrabhattacharya universalneonatalhearingscreeninganecessityandnotachoice
AT diptanshumukherjee universalneonatalhearingscreeninganecessityandnotachoice
AT sirshakdutta universalneonatalhearingscreeninganecessityandnotachoice