Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb)

The Canadian Land Surface Scheme and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CLASS-CTEM) together form the land surface component in the family of Canadian Earth system models (CanESMs). Here, CLASS-CTEM is coupled to Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)'s weather and greenhouse ga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Badawy, S. Polavarapu, D. B. A. Jones, F. Deng, M. Neish, J. R. Melton, R. Nassar, V. K. Arora
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-02-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/11/631/2018/gmd-11-631-2018.pdf
_version_ 1811220069508710400
author B. Badawy
B. Badawy
S. Polavarapu
D. B. A. Jones
F. Deng
M. Neish
J. R. Melton
R. Nassar
V. K. Arora
author_facet B. Badawy
B. Badawy
S. Polavarapu
D. B. A. Jones
F. Deng
M. Neish
J. R. Melton
R. Nassar
V. K. Arora
author_sort B. Badawy
collection DOAJ
description The Canadian Land Surface Scheme and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CLASS-CTEM) together form the land surface component in the family of Canadian Earth system models (CanESMs). Here, CLASS-CTEM is coupled to Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)'s weather and greenhouse gas forecast model (GEM-MACH-GHG) to consistently model atmosphere–land exchange of CO<sub>2</sub>. The coupling between the land and the atmospheric transport model ensures consistency between meteorological forcing of CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and CO<sub>2</sub> transport. The procedure used to spin up carbon pools for CLASS-CTEM for multi-decadal simulations needed to be significantly altered to deal with the limited availability of consistent meteorological information from a constantly changing operational environment in the GEM-MACH-GHG model. Despite the limitations in the spin-up procedure, the simulated fluxes obtained by driving the CLASS-CTEM model with meteorological forcing from GEM-MACH-GHG were comparable to those obtained from CLASS-CTEM when it is driven with standard meteorological forcing from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) combined with reanalysis fields from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) to form CRU-NCEP dataset. This is due to the similarity of the two meteorological datasets in terms of temperature and radiation. However, notable discrepancies in the seasonal variation and spatial patterns of precipitation estimates, especially in the tropics, were reflected in the estimated carbon fluxes, as they significantly affected the magnitude of the vegetation productivity and, to a lesser extent, the seasonal variations in carbon fluxes. Nevertheless, the simulated fluxes based on the meteorological forcing from the GEM-MACH-GHG model are consistent to some extent with other estimates from bottom-up or top-down approaches. Indeed, when simulated fluxes obtained by driving the CLASS-CTEM model with meteorological data from the GEM-MACH-GHG model are used as prior estimates for an atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> inversion analysis using the adjoint of the GEOS-Chem model, the retrieved CO<sub>2</sub> flux estimates are comparable to those obtained from other systems in terms of the global budget and the total flux estimates for the northern extratropical regions, which have good observational coverage. In data-poor regions, as expected, differences in the retrieved fluxes due to the prior fluxes become apparent. Coupling CLASS-CTEM into the Environment Canada Carbon Assimilation System (EC-CAS) is considered an important step toward understanding how meteorological uncertainties affect both CO<sub>2</sub> flux estimates and modeled atmospheric transport. Ultimately, such an approach will provide more direct feedback to the CLASS-CTEM developers and thus help to improve the performance of CLASS-CTEM by identifying the model limitations based on atmospheric constraints.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:35:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4095e0c0a5f04acbb8ac16fee35ae9b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:35:35Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Geoscientific Model Development
spelling doaj.art-4095e0c0a5f04acbb8ac16fee35ae9b72022-12-22T03:41:56ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032018-02-011163166310.5194/gmd-11-631-2018Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb)B. Badawy0B. Badawy1S. Polavarapu2D. B. A. Jones3F. Deng4M. Neish5J. R. Melton6R. Nassar7V. K. Arora8Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canadanow at: Faculty of Environment, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, CanadaClimate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, CanadaDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaClimate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, CanadaClimate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, CanadaClimate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, CanadaClimate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, CanadaThe Canadian Land Surface Scheme and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CLASS-CTEM) together form the land surface component in the family of Canadian Earth system models (CanESMs). Here, CLASS-CTEM is coupled to Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)'s weather and greenhouse gas forecast model (GEM-MACH-GHG) to consistently model atmosphere–land exchange of CO<sub>2</sub>. The coupling between the land and the atmospheric transport model ensures consistency between meteorological forcing of CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and CO<sub>2</sub> transport. The procedure used to spin up carbon pools for CLASS-CTEM for multi-decadal simulations needed to be significantly altered to deal with the limited availability of consistent meteorological information from a constantly changing operational environment in the GEM-MACH-GHG model. Despite the limitations in the spin-up procedure, the simulated fluxes obtained by driving the CLASS-CTEM model with meteorological forcing from GEM-MACH-GHG were comparable to those obtained from CLASS-CTEM when it is driven with standard meteorological forcing from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) combined with reanalysis fields from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) to form CRU-NCEP dataset. This is due to the similarity of the two meteorological datasets in terms of temperature and radiation. However, notable discrepancies in the seasonal variation and spatial patterns of precipitation estimates, especially in the tropics, were reflected in the estimated carbon fluxes, as they significantly affected the magnitude of the vegetation productivity and, to a lesser extent, the seasonal variations in carbon fluxes. Nevertheless, the simulated fluxes based on the meteorological forcing from the GEM-MACH-GHG model are consistent to some extent with other estimates from bottom-up or top-down approaches. Indeed, when simulated fluxes obtained by driving the CLASS-CTEM model with meteorological data from the GEM-MACH-GHG model are used as prior estimates for an atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> inversion analysis using the adjoint of the GEOS-Chem model, the retrieved CO<sub>2</sub> flux estimates are comparable to those obtained from other systems in terms of the global budget and the total flux estimates for the northern extratropical regions, which have good observational coverage. In data-poor regions, as expected, differences in the retrieved fluxes due to the prior fluxes become apparent. Coupling CLASS-CTEM into the Environment Canada Carbon Assimilation System (EC-CAS) is considered an important step toward understanding how meteorological uncertainties affect both CO<sub>2</sub> flux estimates and modeled atmospheric transport. Ultimately, such an approach will provide more direct feedback to the CLASS-CTEM developers and thus help to improve the performance of CLASS-CTEM by identifying the model limitations based on atmospheric constraints.https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/11/631/2018/gmd-11-631-2018.pdf
spellingShingle B. Badawy
B. Badawy
S. Polavarapu
D. B. A. Jones
F. Deng
M. Neish
J. R. Melton
R. Nassar
V. K. Arora
Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb)
Geoscientific Model Development
title Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb)
title_full Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb)
title_fullStr Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb)
title_full_unstemmed Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb)
title_short Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb)
title_sort coupling the canadian terrestrial ecosystem model ctem v 2 0 to environment and climate change canada s greenhouse gas forecast model v 107 glb
url https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/11/631/2018/gmd-11-631-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bbadawy couplingthecanadianterrestrialecosystemmodelctemv20toenvironmentandclimatechangecanadasgreenhousegasforecastmodelv107glb
AT bbadawy couplingthecanadianterrestrialecosystemmodelctemv20toenvironmentandclimatechangecanadasgreenhousegasforecastmodelv107glb
AT spolavarapu couplingthecanadianterrestrialecosystemmodelctemv20toenvironmentandclimatechangecanadasgreenhousegasforecastmodelv107glb
AT dbajones couplingthecanadianterrestrialecosystemmodelctemv20toenvironmentandclimatechangecanadasgreenhousegasforecastmodelv107glb
AT fdeng couplingthecanadianterrestrialecosystemmodelctemv20toenvironmentandclimatechangecanadasgreenhousegasforecastmodelv107glb
AT mneish couplingthecanadianterrestrialecosystemmodelctemv20toenvironmentandclimatechangecanadasgreenhousegasforecastmodelv107glb
AT jrmelton couplingthecanadianterrestrialecosystemmodelctemv20toenvironmentandclimatechangecanadasgreenhousegasforecastmodelv107glb
AT rnassar couplingthecanadianterrestrialecosystemmodelctemv20toenvironmentandclimatechangecanadasgreenhousegasforecastmodelv107glb
AT vkarora couplingthecanadianterrestrialecosystemmodelctemv20toenvironmentandclimatechangecanadasgreenhousegasforecastmodelv107glb