James Clifford's Influence on Bronislaw Malinowski: The Moral Implications of Intertemporal Heterarchy

Drawing on the explanation already offered for the confusion of positivism with realism in the epistemological imagination of the author and founder of postmodern anthropology, the paper analyzes the moral implications of dealing with problems characteristic of the philosophy of science by literary-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miloš Milenković
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Belgrade 2016-02-01
Series:Etnoantropološki Problemi
Online Access:http://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/265
_version_ 1819289545491873792
author Miloš Milenković
author_facet Miloš Milenković
author_sort Miloš Milenković
collection DOAJ
description Drawing on the explanation already offered for the confusion of positivism with realism in the epistemological imagination of the author and founder of postmodern anthropology, the paper analyzes the moral implications of dealing with problems characteristic of the philosophy of science by literary-theoretical means. The transdisciplinary migration of "realism" from literary theory to social science methodology has produced a whole new history of anthropology. The history of pre-postmodern anthropology constructed in this manner can be said to fit the register of some sort of comparative-cultural theory of retroactive moral judgement, complementing postmodern anthropology as a general theory of writing by political subjects, so that the theoretical-methodological dilemmas of postmodern anthropology do not constitute proof of the legitimacy of a holistic interpretation of the discipline’s founders’ intentions, but rather lead to neo-pyrrhonic, formalistic endeavours to uphold, by respecting academic trappings, the academic authority of the discipline whose subject, method and purpose, as a rule, even colleagues from adjacent departments for various reasons fail to understand. In the paper, evidence for this is derived from Clifford's writing of Malinowski, and the moral implications of the unfortunate analogy between the writing of political subjects and the writing of disciplinary founders are followed through. The paper then goes on to explain that the critique of the possibilities of misuse, particularly through political instrumentalization, of anthropological fictions as evidence of Others did not have to come at the cost of sacrificing the semblance of continuity in the establishment of anthropology as a proper academic discipline.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T03:08:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-409ee63e210145ae99b46f630c7d37a9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0353-1589
2334-8801
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T03:08:33Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher University of Belgrade
record_format Article
series Etnoantropološki Problemi
spelling doaj.art-409ee63e210145ae99b46f630c7d37a92022-12-21T17:17:54ZengUniversity of BelgradeEtnoantropološki Problemi0353-15892334-88012016-02-01431729263James Clifford's Influence on Bronislaw Malinowski: The Moral Implications of Intertemporal HeterarchyMiloš Milenković0Department of Ethnology and Anthropology Faculty of Philosophy University of BelgradeDrawing on the explanation already offered for the confusion of positivism with realism in the epistemological imagination of the author and founder of postmodern anthropology, the paper analyzes the moral implications of dealing with problems characteristic of the philosophy of science by literary-theoretical means. The transdisciplinary migration of "realism" from literary theory to social science methodology has produced a whole new history of anthropology. The history of pre-postmodern anthropology constructed in this manner can be said to fit the register of some sort of comparative-cultural theory of retroactive moral judgement, complementing postmodern anthropology as a general theory of writing by political subjects, so that the theoretical-methodological dilemmas of postmodern anthropology do not constitute proof of the legitimacy of a holistic interpretation of the discipline’s founders’ intentions, but rather lead to neo-pyrrhonic, formalistic endeavours to uphold, by respecting academic trappings, the academic authority of the discipline whose subject, method and purpose, as a rule, even colleagues from adjacent departments for various reasons fail to understand. In the paper, evidence for this is derived from Clifford's writing of Malinowski, and the moral implications of the unfortunate analogy between the writing of political subjects and the writing of disciplinary founders are followed through. The paper then goes on to explain that the critique of the possibilities of misuse, particularly through political instrumentalization, of anthropological fictions as evidence of Others did not have to come at the cost of sacrificing the semblance of continuity in the establishment of anthropology as a proper academic discipline.http://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/265
spellingShingle Miloš Milenković
James Clifford's Influence on Bronislaw Malinowski: The Moral Implications of Intertemporal Heterarchy
Etnoantropološki Problemi
title James Clifford's Influence on Bronislaw Malinowski: The Moral Implications of Intertemporal Heterarchy
title_full James Clifford's Influence on Bronislaw Malinowski: The Moral Implications of Intertemporal Heterarchy
title_fullStr James Clifford's Influence on Bronislaw Malinowski: The Moral Implications of Intertemporal Heterarchy
title_full_unstemmed James Clifford's Influence on Bronislaw Malinowski: The Moral Implications of Intertemporal Heterarchy
title_short James Clifford's Influence on Bronislaw Malinowski: The Moral Implications of Intertemporal Heterarchy
title_sort james clifford s influence on bronislaw malinowski the moral implications of intertemporal heterarchy
url http://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/265
work_keys_str_mv AT milosmilenkovic jamescliffordsinfluenceonbronislawmalinowskithemoralimplicationsofintertemporalheterarchy