Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Three Soft Lining Materials to Acrylic Resin Denture Base

Aims: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and different periods of water storage on tensile bond strength of three soft lining materials. Materials and me-thods: Two hundred sixty four (264) specimens have been prepared. Surface treatments used for bond...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Munther N Kazanji, Asmaa A Abid Al-Kadder
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: University of Mosul, College of Dentistry 2012-01-01
Series:Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_42630_4f84615d030db96447bd08e234892a74.html
_version_ 1811282319455027200
author Munther N Kazanji
Asmaa A Abid Al-Kadder
author_facet Munther N Kazanji
Asmaa A Abid Al-Kadder
author_sort Munther N Kazanji
collection DOAJ
description Aims: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and different periods of water storage on tensile bond strength of three soft lining materials. Materials and me-thods: Two hundred sixty four (264) specimens have been prepared. Surface treatments used for bond-ing Molloplast – B liner included roughening acrylic surface with bur, and treatment with primo adhe-sive. For bonding Bony plus liner, roughening acrylic surface with bur, treatment with liner’s liquid and combination of both treatments have been evaluated. For GC Reline liner, roughening acrylic sur-face with bur has been evaluated.Befor tensile bond testing of molloplast-B liner’s specimens they were stored for(1 day or 1 month or 4 months), while Bony plus and GC Reline liners’specimenes were stored for(1 day or 1 week or 1 month) and then tested. Results: The results showed that roughening acrylic surface had an insignificant effect on (TBS) of GC Reline liner and Bony plus liner (although these materials showed cohesive failure). Bony plus liner’s liquid treatments had significant improve-ment in (TBS) of this liner. Different periods of water storage had insignificant effect on (TBS) of Mol-loplast-B liner and GC Reline liner, but (TBS) of Bony plus liner showed significant increasing after 1-month water storage. Conclusion: From the results of this study we can concluded that surface treat-ment to acrylic base improved tensile bond strength of soft lining material ,and the effect of water sto-rage on bond strength differed with different types of soft lining materials.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:50:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-40b7c787750148f194a9992d52f1d833
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1812-1217
1998-0345
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:50:33Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher University of Mosul, College of Dentistry
record_format Article
series Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-40b7c787750148f194a9992d52f1d8332022-12-22T03:07:54ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of DentistryAl-Rafidain Dental Journal1812-12171998-03452012-01-01121576510.33899/rden.2012.42630Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Three Soft Lining Materials to Acrylic Resin Denture BaseMunther N Kazanji Asmaa A Abid Al-KadderAims: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and different periods of water storage on tensile bond strength of three soft lining materials. Materials and me-thods: Two hundred sixty four (264) specimens have been prepared. Surface treatments used for bond-ing Molloplast – B liner included roughening acrylic surface with bur, and treatment with primo adhe-sive. For bonding Bony plus liner, roughening acrylic surface with bur, treatment with liner’s liquid and combination of both treatments have been evaluated. For GC Reline liner, roughening acrylic sur-face with bur has been evaluated.Befor tensile bond testing of molloplast-B liner’s specimens they were stored for(1 day or 1 month or 4 months), while Bony plus and GC Reline liners’specimenes were stored for(1 day or 1 week or 1 month) and then tested. Results: The results showed that roughening acrylic surface had an insignificant effect on (TBS) of GC Reline liner and Bony plus liner (although these materials showed cohesive failure). Bony plus liner’s liquid treatments had significant improve-ment in (TBS) of this liner. Different periods of water storage had insignificant effect on (TBS) of Mol-loplast-B liner and GC Reline liner, but (TBS) of Bony plus liner showed significant increasing after 1-month water storage. Conclusion: From the results of this study we can concluded that surface treat-ment to acrylic base improved tensile bond strength of soft lining material ,and the effect of water sto-rage on bond strength differed with different types of soft lining materials.https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_42630_4f84615d030db96447bd08e234892a74.htmlsoft liner bond strength denture base
spellingShingle Munther N Kazanji
Asmaa A Abid Al-Kadder
Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Three Soft Lining Materials to Acrylic Resin Denture Base
Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
soft liner bond strength denture base
title Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Three Soft Lining Materials to Acrylic Resin Denture Base
title_full Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Three Soft Lining Materials to Acrylic Resin Denture Base
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Three Soft Lining Materials to Acrylic Resin Denture Base
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Three Soft Lining Materials to Acrylic Resin Denture Base
title_short Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Three Soft Lining Materials to Acrylic Resin Denture Base
title_sort evaluation of the bond strength of three soft lining materials to acrylic resin denture base
topic soft liner bond strength denture base
url https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_42630_4f84615d030db96447bd08e234892a74.html
work_keys_str_mv AT munthernkazanji evaluationofthebondstrengthofthreesoftliningmaterialstoacrylicresindenturebase
AT asmaaaabidalkadder evaluationofthebondstrengthofthreesoftliningmaterialstoacrylicresindenturebase