Clinical, Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma

Introduction: Cervical spine trauma occurs in 1.5 to 3% of patients with major trauma and in 10% of patients with major trauma and serious head injury. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of spinal injuries. The various modalities used to evaluate cervical spine are plain radiograph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aditi Himaunshu Dongre, Atul Tukaram Tayade, Sushil Kumar Kale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd. 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijars.net/articles/PDF/2097/8-%2017508_F(P)_PF1(Vsu_Om)_PFA(OM)_PF2(PVSU).pdf
_version_ 1818642504586625024
author Aditi Himaunshu Dongre
Atul Tukaram Tayade
Sushil Kumar Kale
author_facet Aditi Himaunshu Dongre
Atul Tukaram Tayade
Sushil Kumar Kale
author_sort Aditi Himaunshu Dongre
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Cervical spine trauma occurs in 1.5 to 3% of patients with major trauma and in 10% of patients with major trauma and serious head injury. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of spinal injuries. The various modalities used to evaluate cervical spine are plain radiography, computed tomography, CT myelography, intraoperative sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Aim: This study compares the usefulness of conventional radiography and MR imaging in the diagnosis of acute cervical spine trauma. Materials and Methods: This prospective analytical study was carried out on 58 patients with history of cervical spine trauma. Evaluation was done on plain radiography and MR imaging. Findings were recorded on both the modalities and clinical correlation was done. Results: In this study, 94.83% were males. Hyperflexion injuries were seen in 37.93% patients.C6 vertebral fracture was seen in 12% patients. Herniation of the disc was commonly seen at C4-5 and C5-6 disc level on MRI. 64 levels were found to be affected with simple cord edema. Conclusion: MRI combined with plain radiographs provides an accurate and non invasive modality for evaluation of patients with cervical spine trauma.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T23:44:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-40b9627deb934092980d1fd0f79e7b11
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2277-8543
2455-6874
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T23:44:07Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery
spelling doaj.art-40b9627deb934092980d1fd0f79e7b112022-12-21T22:11:33ZengJCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery2277-85432455-68742016-01-0151353910.7860/IJARS/2016/17508:2097Clinical, Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cervical Spine TraumaAditi Himaunshu Dongre0Atul Tukaram Tayade1Sushil Kumar Kale2Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, SKNMC, Narhe, Pune, India.Professor and Head, Department of Radiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sewagram, Wardha, India. Professor, Department of Radiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sewagram, Wardha, India.Introduction: Cervical spine trauma occurs in 1.5 to 3% of patients with major trauma and in 10% of patients with major trauma and serious head injury. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of spinal injuries. The various modalities used to evaluate cervical spine are plain radiography, computed tomography, CT myelography, intraoperative sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Aim: This study compares the usefulness of conventional radiography and MR imaging in the diagnosis of acute cervical spine trauma. Materials and Methods: This prospective analytical study was carried out on 58 patients with history of cervical spine trauma. Evaluation was done on plain radiography and MR imaging. Findings were recorded on both the modalities and clinical correlation was done. Results: In this study, 94.83% were males. Hyperflexion injuries were seen in 37.93% patients.C6 vertebral fracture was seen in 12% patients. Herniation of the disc was commonly seen at C4-5 and C5-6 disc level on MRI. 64 levels were found to be affected with simple cord edema. Conclusion: MRI combined with plain radiographs provides an accurate and non invasive modality for evaluation of patients with cervical spine trauma.http://www.ijars.net/articles/PDF/2097/8-%2017508_F(P)_PF1(Vsu_Om)_PFA(OM)_PF2(PVSU).pdfcord edemafallfractureweakness
spellingShingle Aditi Himaunshu Dongre
Atul Tukaram Tayade
Sushil Kumar Kale
Clinical, Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma
International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery
cord edema
fall
fracture
weakness
title Clinical, Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma
title_full Clinical, Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma
title_fullStr Clinical, Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma
title_full_unstemmed Clinical, Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma
title_short Clinical, Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma
title_sort clinical radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cervical spine trauma
topic cord edema
fall
fracture
weakness
url http://www.ijars.net/articles/PDF/2097/8-%2017508_F(P)_PF1(Vsu_Om)_PFA(OM)_PF2(PVSU).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aditihimaunshudongre clinicalradiographicandmagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofcervicalspinetrauma
AT atultukaramtayade clinicalradiographicandmagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofcervicalspinetrauma
AT sushilkumarkale clinicalradiographicandmagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofcervicalspinetrauma