Comparison of the initial levelling efficiency of two different self-ligating brackets
Aim: The objective of this study, to evaluate the initial alignment effectiveness of two different passive self-ligating brackets (SLBs) and to compare the differences in arch widths. Materials and Methods: The patients with no skeletal discrepancy, Little’s irregularity index (LII) greater than 3 m...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Gazi University
2023-09-01
|
| Series: | Acta Odontologica Turcica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2608093 |
| _version_ | 1827824786661703680 |
|---|---|
| author | Ömür Polat-özsoy Ayça Arman-özçırpıcı Tuğçe Kaşıkcıoğlu Hande Pamukçu |
| author_facet | Ömür Polat-özsoy Ayça Arman-özçırpıcı Tuğçe Kaşıkcıoğlu Hande Pamukçu |
| author_sort | Ömür Polat-özsoy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: The objective of this study, to evaluate the initial alignment effectiveness of two different passive self-ligating brackets (SLBs) and to compare the differences in arch widths.
Materials and Methods: The patients with no skeletal discrepancy, Little’s irregularity index (LII) greater than 3 mm on both arches, who were treated with SLBs and whom had undamaged plaster models at the beginning (T0), 10th week (T1), and 20th week (T2) of their treatment period were enrolled to the study group. Group 1 (Damon) was consisted of 17 patients (mean age=14.5 years) and Group 2 (SmartClip) was consisted of 18 patients (mean age=13.6 years). The analogue dental casts were transferred to a digital model by scanning. Maxillary and mandibular intercanine, intermolar widths and LII were measured by MeshLab software. Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann Whitney U tests was used for statistical evaluation.
Results: There were no significant differences between the groups for the mean LII in T0 (maxillary LII, Group 1= 6.59 mm; Group 2= 6.32 mm; mandibular LII, Group 1= 5.95 mm, Group 2= 5.73mm). The rate of decrease in the LII between T0-T2 and between T1-T2 were found to be significantly higher for Group 1 in the mandible but there was no significant difference between T0-T1 (P= 0.031, P= 0.042, P= 0.113). There was no significant difference for the rate of decrease in the LIIs between the groups in the maxilla. When changes of intermolar and intercanine widths were compared according to the follow-up times, no significant differences were found for the treatment groups.
Conclusion: Both SLBs groups were effective for reducing the crowding in maxillary arch. The increases in intercanine and intermolar widths were found to be similar for both groups. Group 1 was found to be better in the speed of the resolution of the crowding only in the lower incisor region. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:31:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-40c6ad1c32ef41d5878d94c254b53473 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2147-690X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:31:44Z |
| publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
| publisher | Gazi University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Odontologica Turcica |
| spelling | doaj.art-40c6ad1c32ef41d5878d94c254b534732023-09-05T07:43:00ZengGazi UniversityActa Odontologica Turcica2147-690X2023-09-01403849110.17214/gaziaot.116498329Comparison of the initial levelling efficiency of two different self-ligating bracketsÖmür Polat-özsoyAyça Arman-özçırpıcı0Tuğçe KaşıkcıoğluHande Pamukçu1BASKENT UNIVERSITYBAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİAim: The objective of this study, to evaluate the initial alignment effectiveness of two different passive self-ligating brackets (SLBs) and to compare the differences in arch widths. Materials and Methods: The patients with no skeletal discrepancy, Little’s irregularity index (LII) greater than 3 mm on both arches, who were treated with SLBs and whom had undamaged plaster models at the beginning (T0), 10th week (T1), and 20th week (T2) of their treatment period were enrolled to the study group. Group 1 (Damon) was consisted of 17 patients (mean age=14.5 years) and Group 2 (SmartClip) was consisted of 18 patients (mean age=13.6 years). The analogue dental casts were transferred to a digital model by scanning. Maxillary and mandibular intercanine, intermolar widths and LII were measured by MeshLab software. Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann Whitney U tests was used for statistical evaluation. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups for the mean LII in T0 (maxillary LII, Group 1= 6.59 mm; Group 2= 6.32 mm; mandibular LII, Group 1= 5.95 mm, Group 2= 5.73mm). The rate of decrease in the LII between T0-T2 and between T1-T2 were found to be significantly higher for Group 1 in the mandible but there was no significant difference between T0-T1 (P= 0.031, P= 0.042, P= 0.113). There was no significant difference for the rate of decrease in the LIIs between the groups in the maxilla. When changes of intermolar and intercanine widths were compared according to the follow-up times, no significant differences were found for the treatment groups. Conclusion: Both SLBs groups were effective for reducing the crowding in maxillary arch. The increases in intercanine and intermolar widths were found to be similar for both groups. Group 1 was found to be better in the speed of the resolution of the crowding only in the lower incisor region.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2608093orthodonticsorthodontic appliancesorthodontic bracketsortodontiortodontik braketlerortodontik gereçler |
| spellingShingle | Ömür Polat-özsoy Ayça Arman-özçırpıcı Tuğçe Kaşıkcıoğlu Hande Pamukçu Comparison of the initial levelling efficiency of two different self-ligating brackets Acta Odontologica Turcica orthodontics orthodontic appliances orthodontic brackets ortodonti ortodontik braketler ortodontik gereçler |
| title | Comparison of the initial levelling efficiency of two different self-ligating brackets |
| title_full | Comparison of the initial levelling efficiency of two different self-ligating brackets |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the initial levelling efficiency of two different self-ligating brackets |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the initial levelling efficiency of two different self-ligating brackets |
| title_short | Comparison of the initial levelling efficiency of two different self-ligating brackets |
| title_sort | comparison of the initial levelling efficiency of two different self ligating brackets |
| topic | orthodontics orthodontic appliances orthodontic brackets ortodonti ortodontik braketler ortodontik gereçler |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2608093 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT omurpolatozsoy comparisonoftheinitiallevellingefficiencyoftwodifferentselfligatingbrackets AT aycaarmanozcırpıcı comparisonoftheinitiallevellingefficiencyoftwodifferentselfligatingbrackets AT tugcekasıkcıoglu comparisonoftheinitiallevellingefficiencyoftwodifferentselfligatingbrackets AT handepamukcu comparisonoftheinitiallevellingefficiencyoftwodifferentselfligatingbrackets |