Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering

Abstract Patients living with advanced dementia (PLADs) face several challenges to attain the goal of avoiding prolonged dying with severe suffering. One is how to determine when PLADs’ current suffering becomes severe enough to cease all life‐sustaining treatments, including withdrawing assistance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stanley A. Terman, Karl E. Steinberg, Nathaniel Hinerman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12527
_version_ 1797242539437195264
author Stanley A. Terman
Karl E. Steinberg
Nathaniel Hinerman
author_facet Stanley A. Terman
Karl E. Steinberg
Nathaniel Hinerman
author_sort Stanley A. Terman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Patients living with advanced dementia (PLADs) face several challenges to attain the goal of avoiding prolonged dying with severe suffering. One is how to determine when PLADs’ current suffering becomes severe enough to cease all life‐sustaining treatments, including withdrawing assistance with oral feeding and hydrating, a controversial order. This article broadens the concept of suffering by including suffering that cannot be observed contemporaneously and the suffering of loved ones. Four paradigm shifts operationalize these concepts. During advance care planning, patients can judge which future clinical conditions would cause severe suffering. To decide when to allow patients to die, treating physicians/providers only need to assess if patients have reached patients' previously judged, qualifying conditions. Questions: Will this protocol prevent PLADs’ prolonged dying with suffering? Deter early‐stage dementia patients from committing preemptive suicide? Sway decision‐making surrogates from withholding life‐sustaining treatments from patients with middle‐stage dementia? Provoke providers’ resistance to relinquish their traditional, unilateral authority to determine patients’ suffering?
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:40:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-40d66dcb6aed4c319106b3b706db274c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-8729
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:40:50Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
spelling doaj.art-40d66dcb6aed4c319106b3b706db274c2024-03-27T13:14:40ZengWileyAlzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring2352-87292024-01-01161n/an/a10.1002/dad2.12527Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of sufferingStanley A. Terman0Karl E. Steinberg1Nathaniel Hinerman2Caring Advocates Sausalito California USAShiley Haynes Institute for Palliative Care California State University, San Marcos San Marcos California USASchool of Undergraduate Studies Department of Psychology, Golden Gate University San Francisco California USAAbstract Patients living with advanced dementia (PLADs) face several challenges to attain the goal of avoiding prolonged dying with severe suffering. One is how to determine when PLADs’ current suffering becomes severe enough to cease all life‐sustaining treatments, including withdrawing assistance with oral feeding and hydrating, a controversial order. This article broadens the concept of suffering by including suffering that cannot be observed contemporaneously and the suffering of loved ones. Four paradigm shifts operationalize these concepts. During advance care planning, patients can judge which future clinical conditions would cause severe suffering. To decide when to allow patients to die, treating physicians/providers only need to assess if patients have reached patients' previously judged, qualifying conditions. Questions: Will this protocol prevent PLADs’ prolonged dying with suffering? Deter early‐stage dementia patients from committing preemptive suicide? Sway decision‐making surrogates from withholding life‐sustaining treatments from patients with middle‐stage dementia? Provoke providers’ resistance to relinquish their traditional, unilateral authority to determine patients’ suffering?https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12527advanced dementiaadvanced instructional health care directivesceasing oral nutrition and hydrationend‐of‐life sufferingtiming of allowing patients to diewithdrawing life‐sustaining interventions
spellingShingle Stanley A. Terman
Karl E. Steinberg
Nathaniel Hinerman
Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering
Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
advanced dementia
advanced instructional health care directives
ceasing oral nutrition and hydration
end‐of‐life suffering
timing of allowing patients to die
withdrawing life‐sustaining interventions
title Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering
title_full Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering
title_fullStr Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering
title_full_unstemmed Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering
title_short Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering
title_sort timely dying in dementia use patients judgments and broaden the concept of suffering
topic advanced dementia
advanced instructional health care directives
ceasing oral nutrition and hydration
end‐of‐life suffering
timing of allowing patients to die
withdrawing life‐sustaining interventions
url https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12527
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleyaterman timelydyingindementiausepatientsjudgmentsandbroadentheconceptofsuffering
AT karlesteinberg timelydyingindementiausepatientsjudgmentsandbroadentheconceptofsuffering
AT nathanielhinerman timelydyingindementiausepatientsjudgmentsandbroadentheconceptofsuffering