Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil

One of the earliest earth retention technologies used in civil engineering projects is sheet pile walls. Therefore, in this work, a numerical analysis using Plaxis 2D was performed to investigate the behaviour of laterally anchored retaining system in sandy soil, focusing on the anchor force, latera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aml Elbahkery, Mostafa Alsawwaf, Ashraf Nazir, waseim azzam
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Engineering Research - Egypt
Subjects:
Online Access:https://erjeng.journals.ekb.eg/article_179390_e7a68b799911b96f016c41bb230dd9f9.pdf
_version_ 1826994376707932160
author Aml Elbahkery
Mostafa Alsawwaf
Ashraf Nazir
waseim azzam
author_facet Aml Elbahkery
Mostafa Alsawwaf
Ashraf Nazir
waseim azzam
author_sort Aml Elbahkery
collection DOAJ
description One of the earliest earth retention technologies used in civil engineering projects is sheet pile walls. Therefore, in this work, a numerical analysis using Plaxis 2D was performed to investigate the behaviour of laterally anchored retaining system in sandy soil, focusing on the anchor force, lateral displacement, and maximum bending moment. The effects of anchor location and number on wall and soil deformations were investigated for various wall heights. When anchored-sheet-piles were used instead of cantilever sheet piles, the results showed a significant reduction in both wall deformation and bending moment specially at high dredging levels. In addition, while having numerous anchor levels is the most approach to minimize wall and soil deformations. Also, the findings revealed that adopting the one-anchored sheet pile wall can greatly decrease the maximum wall displacement by about and 59.16%; which occurs at 0.4H; as well as reduce the maximum bending moment by about 85.63%; which occurs at 0.5H, comparing with the cantilever sheet pile wall at dredging depth (H) = 5m. At a deeper dredging depth (H=9m), the maximum lateral displacement and maximum of wall were reduced by 88 %, and 86 %, respectively. Also, at H= 9m, using the second level of anchors can also reduce the maximum bending moment on the wall by more than 83.55 %.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:14:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-40db2ba5e331449a9edd1fed0ad48ae7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2356-9441
2735-4873
language Arabic
last_indexed 2025-02-18T09:17:46Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University
record_format Article
series Journal of Engineering Research - Egypt
spelling doaj.art-40db2ba5e331449a9edd1fed0ad48ae72024-11-02T22:10:39ZaraFaculty of Engineering, Tanta UniversityJournal of Engineering Research - Egypt2356-94412735-48732021-06-0152394810.21608/erjeng.2021.78977.1016179390Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand SoilAml Elbahkery0Mostafa Alsawwaf1Ashraf Nazir2waseim azzam3M. SC. Student, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University/ Tanta, EgyptProfessor of geotechnical EngineeringProfessor of geotechnical EngineeringProfessor of geotechnical EngineeringOne of the earliest earth retention technologies used in civil engineering projects is sheet pile walls. Therefore, in this work, a numerical analysis using Plaxis 2D was performed to investigate the behaviour of laterally anchored retaining system in sandy soil, focusing on the anchor force, lateral displacement, and maximum bending moment. The effects of anchor location and number on wall and soil deformations were investigated for various wall heights. When anchored-sheet-piles were used instead of cantilever sheet piles, the results showed a significant reduction in both wall deformation and bending moment specially at high dredging levels. In addition, while having numerous anchor levels is the most approach to minimize wall and soil deformations. Also, the findings revealed that adopting the one-anchored sheet pile wall can greatly decrease the maximum wall displacement by about and 59.16%; which occurs at 0.4H; as well as reduce the maximum bending moment by about 85.63%; which occurs at 0.5H, comparing with the cantilever sheet pile wall at dredging depth (H) = 5m. At a deeper dredging depth (H=9m), the maximum lateral displacement and maximum of wall were reduced by 88 %, and 86 %, respectively. Also, at H= 9m, using the second level of anchors can also reduce the maximum bending moment on the wall by more than 83.55 %.https://erjeng.journals.ekb.eg/article_179390_e7a68b799911b96f016c41bb230dd9f9.pdfretaining sheet pilepenetration depthlateral deformationmaximum bending moment
spellingShingle Aml Elbahkery
Mostafa Alsawwaf
Ashraf Nazir
waseim azzam
Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil
Journal of Engineering Research - Egypt
retaining sheet pile
penetration depth
lateral deformation
maximum bending moment
title Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil
title_full Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil
title_fullStr Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil
title_full_unstemmed Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil
title_short Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil
title_sort behaviour of laterally anchored retaining system in loose sand soil
topic retaining sheet pile
penetration depth
lateral deformation
maximum bending moment
url https://erjeng.journals.ekb.eg/article_179390_e7a68b799911b96f016c41bb230dd9f9.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT amlelbahkery behaviouroflaterallyanchoredretainingsysteminloosesandsoil
AT mostafaalsawwaf behaviouroflaterallyanchoredretainingsysteminloosesandsoil
AT ashrafnazir behaviouroflaterallyanchoredretainingsysteminloosesandsoil
AT waseimazzam behaviouroflaterallyanchoredretainingsysteminloosesandsoil