Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil
One of the earliest earth retention technologies used in civil engineering projects is sheet pile walls. Therefore, in this work, a numerical analysis using Plaxis 2D was performed to investigate the behaviour of laterally anchored retaining system in sandy soil, focusing on the anchor force, latera...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Arabic |
Published: |
Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Engineering Research - Egypt |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://erjeng.journals.ekb.eg/article_179390_e7a68b799911b96f016c41bb230dd9f9.pdf |
_version_ | 1826994376707932160 |
---|---|
author | Aml Elbahkery Mostafa Alsawwaf Ashraf Nazir waseim azzam |
author_facet | Aml Elbahkery Mostafa Alsawwaf Ashraf Nazir waseim azzam |
author_sort | Aml Elbahkery |
collection | DOAJ |
description | One of the earliest earth retention technologies used in civil engineering projects is sheet pile walls. Therefore, in this work, a numerical analysis using Plaxis 2D was performed to investigate the behaviour of laterally anchored retaining system in sandy soil, focusing on the anchor force, lateral displacement, and maximum bending moment. The effects of anchor location and number on wall and soil deformations were investigated for various wall heights. When anchored-sheet-piles were used instead of cantilever sheet piles, the results showed a significant reduction in both wall deformation and bending moment specially at high dredging levels. In addition, while having numerous anchor levels is the most approach to minimize wall and soil deformations. Also, the findings revealed that adopting the one-anchored sheet pile wall can greatly decrease the maximum wall displacement by about and 59.16%; which occurs at 0.4H; as well as reduce the maximum bending moment by about 85.63%; which occurs at 0.5H, comparing with the cantilever sheet pile wall at dredging depth (H) = 5m. At a deeper dredging depth (H=9m), the maximum lateral displacement and maximum of wall were reduced by 88 %, and 86 %, respectively. Also, at H= 9m, using the second level of anchors can also reduce the maximum bending moment on the wall by more than 83.55 %. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T04:14:27Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-40db2ba5e331449a9edd1fed0ad48ae7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2356-9441 2735-4873 |
language | Arabic |
last_indexed | 2025-02-18T09:17:46Z |
publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
publisher | Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Engineering Research - Egypt |
spelling | doaj.art-40db2ba5e331449a9edd1fed0ad48ae72024-11-02T22:10:39ZaraFaculty of Engineering, Tanta UniversityJournal of Engineering Research - Egypt2356-94412735-48732021-06-0152394810.21608/erjeng.2021.78977.1016179390Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand SoilAml Elbahkery0Mostafa Alsawwaf1Ashraf Nazir2waseim azzam3M. SC. Student, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University/ Tanta, EgyptProfessor of geotechnical EngineeringProfessor of geotechnical EngineeringProfessor of geotechnical EngineeringOne of the earliest earth retention technologies used in civil engineering projects is sheet pile walls. Therefore, in this work, a numerical analysis using Plaxis 2D was performed to investigate the behaviour of laterally anchored retaining system in sandy soil, focusing on the anchor force, lateral displacement, and maximum bending moment. The effects of anchor location and number on wall and soil deformations were investigated for various wall heights. When anchored-sheet-piles were used instead of cantilever sheet piles, the results showed a significant reduction in both wall deformation and bending moment specially at high dredging levels. In addition, while having numerous anchor levels is the most approach to minimize wall and soil deformations. Also, the findings revealed that adopting the one-anchored sheet pile wall can greatly decrease the maximum wall displacement by about and 59.16%; which occurs at 0.4H; as well as reduce the maximum bending moment by about 85.63%; which occurs at 0.5H, comparing with the cantilever sheet pile wall at dredging depth (H) = 5m. At a deeper dredging depth (H=9m), the maximum lateral displacement and maximum of wall were reduced by 88 %, and 86 %, respectively. Also, at H= 9m, using the second level of anchors can also reduce the maximum bending moment on the wall by more than 83.55 %.https://erjeng.journals.ekb.eg/article_179390_e7a68b799911b96f016c41bb230dd9f9.pdfretaining sheet pilepenetration depthlateral deformationmaximum bending moment |
spellingShingle | Aml Elbahkery Mostafa Alsawwaf Ashraf Nazir waseim azzam Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil Journal of Engineering Research - Egypt retaining sheet pile penetration depth lateral deformation maximum bending moment |
title | Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil |
title_full | Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil |
title_fullStr | Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil |
title_full_unstemmed | Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil |
title_short | Behaviour of Laterally Anchored Retaining System in Loose Sand Soil |
title_sort | behaviour of laterally anchored retaining system in loose sand soil |
topic | retaining sheet pile penetration depth lateral deformation maximum bending moment |
url | https://erjeng.journals.ekb.eg/article_179390_e7a68b799911b96f016c41bb230dd9f9.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amlelbahkery behaviouroflaterallyanchoredretainingsysteminloosesandsoil AT mostafaalsawwaf behaviouroflaterallyanchoredretainingsysteminloosesandsoil AT ashrafnazir behaviouroflaterallyanchoredretainingsysteminloosesandsoil AT waseimazzam behaviouroflaterallyanchoredretainingsysteminloosesandsoil |