Speech Emotion Recognition: Humans vs Machines

Introduction. The study focuses on emotional speech perception and speech emotion recognition using prosodic clues alone. Theoretical problems of defining prosody, intonation and emotion along with the challenges of emotion classification are discussed. An overview of acoustic and perceptional corre...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: S. Werner, G. N. Petrenko
Μορφή: Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University 2019-12-01
Σειρά:Дискурс
Θέματα:
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://discourse.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/289
_version_ 1826569555369000960
author S. Werner
G. N. Petrenko
author_facet S. Werner
G. N. Petrenko
author_sort S. Werner
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. The study focuses on emotional speech perception and speech emotion recognition using prosodic clues alone. Theoretical problems of defining prosody, intonation and emotion along with the challenges of emotion classification are discussed. An overview of acoustic and perceptional correlates of emotions found in speech is provided. Technical approaches to speech emotion recognition are also considered in the light of the latest emotional speech automatic classification experiments.Methodology and sources. The typical “big six” classification commonly used in technical applications is chosen and modified to include such emotions as disgust and shame. A database of emotional speech in Russian is created under sound laboratory conditions. A perception experiment is run using Praat software’s experimental environment.Results and discussion. Cross-cultural emotion recognition possibilities are revealed, as the Finnish and international participants recognised about a half of samples correctly. Nonetheless, native speakers of Russian appear to distinguish a larger proportion of emotions correctly. The effects of foreign languages knowledge, musical training and gender on the performance in the experiment were insufficiently prominent. The most commonly confused pairs of emotions, such as shame and sadness, surprise and fear, anger and disgust as well as confusions with neutral emotion were also given due attention.Conclusion. The work can contribute to psychological studies, clarifying emotion classification and gender aspect of emotionality, linguistic research, providing new evidence for prosodic and comparative language studies, and language technology, deepening the understanding of possible challenges for SER systems.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T03:23:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-40e2b5fa452d4a65aeb76b8fecf855f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2412-8562
2658-7777
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-14T11:41:12Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University
record_format Article
series Дискурс
spelling doaj.art-40e2b5fa452d4a65aeb76b8fecf855f82025-03-02T09:57:01ZengSaint Petersburg Electrotechnical UniversityДискурс2412-85622658-77772019-12-015513615210.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-5-136-152287Speech Emotion Recognition: Humans vs MachinesS. Werner0G. N. Petrenko1University of Eastern FinlandSaint Petersburg Electrotechnical UniversityIntroduction. The study focuses on emotional speech perception and speech emotion recognition using prosodic clues alone. Theoretical problems of defining prosody, intonation and emotion along with the challenges of emotion classification are discussed. An overview of acoustic and perceptional correlates of emotions found in speech is provided. Technical approaches to speech emotion recognition are also considered in the light of the latest emotional speech automatic classification experiments.Methodology and sources. The typical “big six” classification commonly used in technical applications is chosen and modified to include such emotions as disgust and shame. A database of emotional speech in Russian is created under sound laboratory conditions. A perception experiment is run using Praat software’s experimental environment.Results and discussion. Cross-cultural emotion recognition possibilities are revealed, as the Finnish and international participants recognised about a half of samples correctly. Nonetheless, native speakers of Russian appear to distinguish a larger proportion of emotions correctly. The effects of foreign languages knowledge, musical training and gender on the performance in the experiment were insufficiently prominent. The most commonly confused pairs of emotions, such as shame and sadness, surprise and fear, anger and disgust as well as confusions with neutral emotion were also given due attention.Conclusion. The work can contribute to psychological studies, clarifying emotion classification and gender aspect of emotionality, linguistic research, providing new evidence for prosodic and comparative language studies, and language technology, deepening the understanding of possible challenges for SER systems.https://discourse.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/289emotional speechspeech emotion perceptionspeech emotion recognitionrussian emotional speech databaseemotional speech corporaemotion classification
spellingShingle S. Werner
G. N. Petrenko
Speech Emotion Recognition: Humans vs Machines
Дискурс
emotional speech
speech emotion perception
speech emotion recognition
russian emotional speech database
emotional speech corpora
emotion classification
title Speech Emotion Recognition: Humans vs Machines
title_full Speech Emotion Recognition: Humans vs Machines
title_fullStr Speech Emotion Recognition: Humans vs Machines
title_full_unstemmed Speech Emotion Recognition: Humans vs Machines
title_short Speech Emotion Recognition: Humans vs Machines
title_sort speech emotion recognition humans vs machines
topic emotional speech
speech emotion perception
speech emotion recognition
russian emotional speech database
emotional speech corpora
emotion classification
url https://discourse.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/289
work_keys_str_mv AT swerner speechemotionrecognitionhumansvsmachines
AT gnpetrenko speechemotionrecognitionhumansvsmachines