Timeliness of contact tracing among flight passengers for influenza A/H1N1 2009
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>During the initial containment phase of influenza A/H1N1 2009, close contacts of cases were traced to provide antiviral prophylaxis within 48 h after exposure and to alert them on signs of disease for early diagnosis and treatment. P...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2011-12-01
|
| Series: | BMC Infectious Diseases |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/355 |
| _version_ | 1811245773994590208 |
|---|---|
| author | Swaan Corien M Appels Rolf Kretzschmar Mirjam EE van Steenbergen Jim E |
| author_facet | Swaan Corien M Appels Rolf Kretzschmar Mirjam EE van Steenbergen Jim E |
| author_sort | Swaan Corien M |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>During the initial containment phase of influenza A/H1N1 2009, close contacts of cases were traced to provide antiviral prophylaxis within 48 h after exposure and to alert them on signs of disease for early diagnosis and treatment. Passengers seated on the same row, two rows in front or behind a patient infectious for influenza, during a flight of ≥ 4 h were considered close contacts. This study evaluates the timeliness of flight-contact tracing (CT) as performed following national and international CT requests addressed to the Center of Infectious Disease Control (CIb/RIVM), and implemented by the Municipal Health Services of Schiphol Airport.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Elapsed days between date of flight arrival and the date passenger lists became available (contact details identified - CI) was used as proxy for timeliness of CT. In a retrospective study, dates of flight arrival, onset of illness, laboratory diagnosis, CT request and identification of contacts details through passenger lists, following CT requests to the RIVM for flights landed at Schiphol Airport were collected and analyzed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>24 requests for CT were identified. Three of these were declined as over 4 days had elapsed since flight arrival. In 17 out of 21 requests, contact details were obtained within 7 days after arrival (81%). The average delay between arrival and CI was 3,9 days (range 2-7), mainly caused by delay in diagnosis of the index patient after arrival (2,6 days). In four flights (19%), contacts were not identified or only after > 7 days. CI involving Dutch airlines was faster than non-Dutch airlines (<it>P </it>< 0,05). Passenger locator cards did not improve timeliness of CI. In only three flights contact details were identified within 2 days after arrival.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>CT for influenza A/H1N1 2009 among flight passengers was not successful for timely provision of prophylaxis. CT had little additional value for alerting passengers for disease symptoms, as this information already was provided during and after the flight. Public health authorities should take into account patient delays in seeking medical advise and laboratory confirmation in relation to maximum time to provide postexposure prophylaxis when deciding to install contact tracing measures. International standardization of CT guidelines is recommended.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T14:44:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-40e5b30dda4c4f1ba315d7a45c7dda3e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2334 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T14:44:11Z |
| publishDate | 2011-12-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Infectious Diseases |
| spelling | doaj.art-40e5b30dda4c4f1ba315d7a45c7dda3e2022-12-22T03:28:42ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342011-12-0111135510.1186/1471-2334-11-355Timeliness of contact tracing among flight passengers for influenza A/H1N1 2009Swaan Corien MAppels RolfKretzschmar Mirjam EEvan Steenbergen Jim E<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>During the initial containment phase of influenza A/H1N1 2009, close contacts of cases were traced to provide antiviral prophylaxis within 48 h after exposure and to alert them on signs of disease for early diagnosis and treatment. Passengers seated on the same row, two rows in front or behind a patient infectious for influenza, during a flight of ≥ 4 h were considered close contacts. This study evaluates the timeliness of flight-contact tracing (CT) as performed following national and international CT requests addressed to the Center of Infectious Disease Control (CIb/RIVM), and implemented by the Municipal Health Services of Schiphol Airport.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Elapsed days between date of flight arrival and the date passenger lists became available (contact details identified - CI) was used as proxy for timeliness of CT. In a retrospective study, dates of flight arrival, onset of illness, laboratory diagnosis, CT request and identification of contacts details through passenger lists, following CT requests to the RIVM for flights landed at Schiphol Airport were collected and analyzed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>24 requests for CT were identified. Three of these were declined as over 4 days had elapsed since flight arrival. In 17 out of 21 requests, contact details were obtained within 7 days after arrival (81%). The average delay between arrival and CI was 3,9 days (range 2-7), mainly caused by delay in diagnosis of the index patient after arrival (2,6 days). In four flights (19%), contacts were not identified or only after > 7 days. CI involving Dutch airlines was faster than non-Dutch airlines (<it>P </it>< 0,05). Passenger locator cards did not improve timeliness of CI. In only three flights contact details were identified within 2 days after arrival.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>CT for influenza A/H1N1 2009 among flight passengers was not successful for timely provision of prophylaxis. CT had little additional value for alerting passengers for disease symptoms, as this information already was provided during and after the flight. Public health authorities should take into account patient delays in seeking medical advise and laboratory confirmation in relation to maximum time to provide postexposure prophylaxis when deciding to install contact tracing measures. International standardization of CT guidelines is recommended.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/355 |
| spellingShingle | Swaan Corien M Appels Rolf Kretzschmar Mirjam EE van Steenbergen Jim E Timeliness of contact tracing among flight passengers for influenza A/H1N1 2009 BMC Infectious Diseases |
| title | Timeliness of contact tracing among flight passengers for influenza A/H1N1 2009 |
| title_full | Timeliness of contact tracing among flight passengers for influenza A/H1N1 2009 |
| title_fullStr | Timeliness of contact tracing among flight passengers for influenza A/H1N1 2009 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Timeliness of contact tracing among flight passengers for influenza A/H1N1 2009 |
| title_short | Timeliness of contact tracing among flight passengers for influenza A/H1N1 2009 |
| title_sort | timeliness of contact tracing among flight passengers for influenza a h1n1 2009 |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/355 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT swaancorienm timelinessofcontacttracingamongflightpassengersforinfluenzaah1n12009 AT appelsrolf timelinessofcontacttracingamongflightpassengersforinfluenzaah1n12009 AT kretzschmarmirjamee timelinessofcontacttracingamongflightpassengersforinfluenzaah1n12009 AT vansteenbergenjime timelinessofcontacttracingamongflightpassengersforinfluenzaah1n12009 |