Problematic communications during 2016 fellowship recruitment in internal medicine

Some internal medicine residency program directors have expressed concerns that their third-year residents may have been subjected to inappropriate communication during the 2016 fellowship recruitment season. The authors sought to study applicants’ interpersonal communication experiences with fellow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patricia A. Cornett, Chris Williams, Richard L. Alweis, John McConville, Michael Frank, Bhavin Dalal, Richard I. Kopelman, Vera P. Luther, Alec B. O’connor, Elaine A. Muchmore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Greater Baltimore Medical Center 2017-10-01
Series:Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2017.1381546
_version_ 1797966395650080768
author Patricia A. Cornett
Chris Williams
Richard L. Alweis
John McConville
Michael Frank
Bhavin Dalal
Richard I. Kopelman
Vera P. Luther
Alec B. O’connor
Elaine A. Muchmore
author_facet Patricia A. Cornett
Chris Williams
Richard L. Alweis
John McConville
Michael Frank
Bhavin Dalal
Richard I. Kopelman
Vera P. Luther
Alec B. O’connor
Elaine A. Muchmore
author_sort Patricia A. Cornett
collection DOAJ
description Some internal medicine residency program directors have expressed concerns that their third-year residents may have been subjected to inappropriate communication during the 2016 fellowship recruitment season. The authors sought to study applicants’ interpersonal communication experiences with fellowship programs. Many respondents indicated that they had been asked questions that would constitute violations of the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) Communications Code of Conduct agreement, including how they plan to rank specific programs. Moreover, female respondents were more likely to have been asked questions during interview experiences about other programs to which they applied, and about their family plans. Post-interview communication policies were not made clear to most applicants. These results suggest ongoing challenges for the internal medicine community to improve communication with applicants and uniform compliance with the NRMP communications code of conduct during the fellowship recruitment process.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T02:13:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-40ef2ff0019f4b48b809201fa502ee14
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2000-9666
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T02:13:50Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Greater Baltimore Medical Center
record_format Article
series Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives
spelling doaj.art-40ef2ff0019f4b48b809201fa502ee142023-01-03T01:28:39ZengGreater Baltimore Medical CenterJournal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives2000-96662017-10-017527728110.1080/20009666.2017.13815461381546Problematic communications during 2016 fellowship recruitment in internal medicinePatricia A. Cornett0Chris Williams1Richard L. Alweis2John McConville3Michael Frank4Bhavin Dalal5Richard I. Kopelman6Vera P. Luther7Alec B. O’connor8Elaine A. Muchmore9University of California, San FranciscoGeorge Washington School of Public HealthUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester General HospitalUniversity of Chicago School of MedicineMedical College of WisconsinOakland University William Beaumont School of MedicineTufts University School of MedicineWake Forest School of MedicineUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryUniversity of California, San Diego, School of Medicine and VA San Diego Health SystemSome internal medicine residency program directors have expressed concerns that their third-year residents may have been subjected to inappropriate communication during the 2016 fellowship recruitment season. The authors sought to study applicants’ interpersonal communication experiences with fellowship programs. Many respondents indicated that they had been asked questions that would constitute violations of the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) Communications Code of Conduct agreement, including how they plan to rank specific programs. Moreover, female respondents were more likely to have been asked questions during interview experiences about other programs to which they applied, and about their family plans. Post-interview communication policies were not made clear to most applicants. These results suggest ongoing challenges for the internal medicine community to improve communication with applicants and uniform compliance with the NRMP communications code of conduct during the fellowship recruitment process.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2017.1381546Fellowshipmatchcommunicationsinternal medicine residents​NRMP
spellingShingle Patricia A. Cornett
Chris Williams
Richard L. Alweis
John McConville
Michael Frank
Bhavin Dalal
Richard I. Kopelman
Vera P. Luther
Alec B. O’connor
Elaine A. Muchmore
Problematic communications during 2016 fellowship recruitment in internal medicine
Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives
Fellowship
match
communications
internal medicine residents​
NRMP
title Problematic communications during 2016 fellowship recruitment in internal medicine
title_full Problematic communications during 2016 fellowship recruitment in internal medicine
title_fullStr Problematic communications during 2016 fellowship recruitment in internal medicine
title_full_unstemmed Problematic communications during 2016 fellowship recruitment in internal medicine
title_short Problematic communications during 2016 fellowship recruitment in internal medicine
title_sort problematic communications during 2016 fellowship recruitment in internal medicine
topic Fellowship
match
communications
internal medicine residents​
NRMP
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2017.1381546
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciaacornett problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine
AT chriswilliams problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine
AT richardlalweis problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine
AT johnmcconville problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine
AT michaelfrank problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine
AT bhavindalal problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine
AT richardikopelman problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine
AT verapluther problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine
AT alecboconnor problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine
AT elaineamuchmore problematiccommunicationsduring2016fellowshiprecruitmentininternalmedicine