Scoping review of interventions to de-implement potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in healthcare settings
Objectives Potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) utilisation persists at undesirable rates worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs in healthcare settings and to suggest directions for fu...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2024-04-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/4/e078808.full |
_version_ | 1797202243697508352 |
---|---|
author | John W Epling Michelle S Rockwell Emma G Oyese Eshika Singh Matthew Vinson Isaiah Yim Jamie K Turner |
author_facet | John W Epling Michelle S Rockwell Emma G Oyese Eshika Singh Matthew Vinson Isaiah Yim Jamie K Turner |
author_sort | John W Epling |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objectives Potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) utilisation persists at undesirable rates worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs in healthcare settings and to suggest directions for future research.Design Scoping review.Data sources PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar (1 January 2000 to 31 May 2022).Study selection Studies reporting on the effectiveness of interventions to systematically reduce potentially harmful NSAID utilisation in healthcare settings.Data extraction Using Covidence systematic review software, we extracted study and intervention characteristics, including the effectiveness of interventions in reducing NSAID utilisation.Results From 7818 articles initially identified, 68 were included in the review. Most studies took place in European countries (45.6%) or the USA (35.3%), with randomised controlled trial as the most common design (55.9%). Interventions were largely clinician-facing (76.2%) and delivered in primary care (60.2%) but were rarely (14.9%) guided by an implementation model, framework or theory. Academic detailing, clinical decision support or electronic medical record interventions, performance reports and pharmacist review were frequent approaches employed. NSAID use was most commonly classified as potentially harmful based on patients’ age (55.8%), history of gastrointestinal disorders (47.1%), or history of kidney disease (38.2%). Only 7.4% of interventions focused on over-the-counter (OTC) NSAIDs in addition to prescription. The majority of studies (76.2%) reported a reduction in the utilisation of potentially harmful NSAIDs. Few studies (5.9%) evaluated pain or quality of life following NSAIDs discontinuation.Conclusion Many varied interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs have been applied in healthcare settings worldwide. Based on these findings and identified knowledge gaps, further efforts to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and the combination of intervention characteristics associated with effective de-implementation are needed. In addition, future work should be guided by de-implementation theory, focus on OTC NSAIDs and incorporate patient-focused strategies and outcomes, including the evaluation of unintended consequences of the intervention. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:00:21Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4105320347214cdda47041f2b1b65b59 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2044-6055 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:00:21Z |
publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | Article |
series | BMJ Open |
spelling | doaj.art-4105320347214cdda47041f2b1b65b592024-04-17T18:05:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-04-0114410.1136/bmjopen-2023-078808Scoping review of interventions to de-implement potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in healthcare settingsJohn W Epling0Michelle S Rockwell1Emma G Oyese2Eshika Singh3Matthew Vinson4Isaiah Yim5Jamie K Turner6Family physicianFamily and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USAFamily and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USAFamily and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USAFamily and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USAFamily and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USAFamily and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USAObjectives Potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) utilisation persists at undesirable rates worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs in healthcare settings and to suggest directions for future research.Design Scoping review.Data sources PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar (1 January 2000 to 31 May 2022).Study selection Studies reporting on the effectiveness of interventions to systematically reduce potentially harmful NSAID utilisation in healthcare settings.Data extraction Using Covidence systematic review software, we extracted study and intervention characteristics, including the effectiveness of interventions in reducing NSAID utilisation.Results From 7818 articles initially identified, 68 were included in the review. Most studies took place in European countries (45.6%) or the USA (35.3%), with randomised controlled trial as the most common design (55.9%). Interventions were largely clinician-facing (76.2%) and delivered in primary care (60.2%) but were rarely (14.9%) guided by an implementation model, framework or theory. Academic detailing, clinical decision support or electronic medical record interventions, performance reports and pharmacist review were frequent approaches employed. NSAID use was most commonly classified as potentially harmful based on patients’ age (55.8%), history of gastrointestinal disorders (47.1%), or history of kidney disease (38.2%). Only 7.4% of interventions focused on over-the-counter (OTC) NSAIDs in addition to prescription. The majority of studies (76.2%) reported a reduction in the utilisation of potentially harmful NSAIDs. Few studies (5.9%) evaluated pain or quality of life following NSAIDs discontinuation.Conclusion Many varied interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs have been applied in healthcare settings worldwide. Based on these findings and identified knowledge gaps, further efforts to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and the combination of intervention characteristics associated with effective de-implementation are needed. In addition, future work should be guided by de-implementation theory, focus on OTC NSAIDs and incorporate patient-focused strategies and outcomes, including the evaluation of unintended consequences of the intervention.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/4/e078808.full |
spellingShingle | John W Epling Michelle S Rockwell Emma G Oyese Eshika Singh Matthew Vinson Isaiah Yim Jamie K Turner Scoping review of interventions to de-implement potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in healthcare settings BMJ Open |
title | Scoping review of interventions to de-implement potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in healthcare settings |
title_full | Scoping review of interventions to de-implement potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in healthcare settings |
title_fullStr | Scoping review of interventions to de-implement potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in healthcare settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Scoping review of interventions to de-implement potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in healthcare settings |
title_short | Scoping review of interventions to de-implement potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in healthcare settings |
title_sort | scoping review of interventions to de implement potentially harmful non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs nsaids in healthcare settings |
url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/4/e078808.full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnwepling scopingreviewofinterventionstodeimplementpotentiallyharmfulnonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugsnsaidsinhealthcaresettings AT michellesrockwell scopingreviewofinterventionstodeimplementpotentiallyharmfulnonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugsnsaidsinhealthcaresettings AT emmagoyese scopingreviewofinterventionstodeimplementpotentiallyharmfulnonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugsnsaidsinhealthcaresettings AT eshikasingh scopingreviewofinterventionstodeimplementpotentiallyharmfulnonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugsnsaidsinhealthcaresettings AT matthewvinson scopingreviewofinterventionstodeimplementpotentiallyharmfulnonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugsnsaidsinhealthcaresettings AT isaiahyim scopingreviewofinterventionstodeimplementpotentiallyharmfulnonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugsnsaidsinhealthcaresettings AT jamiekturner scopingreviewofinterventionstodeimplementpotentiallyharmfulnonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugsnsaidsinhealthcaresettings |