Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer

Abstract Background When ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer (IMBC) is detected, standard routine is to evaluate the largest tumor with immunohistochemistry (IHC). As all foci are not routinely characterized, many patients may not receive optimal adjuvant treatment. Here, we assess the clin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Slavica Janeva, Ellen Krabbe, Toshima Z. Parris, Salmir Nasic, Marie Sundquist, Per Karlsson, Riccardo A. Audisio, Roger Olofsson Bagge, Anikó Kovács
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:Breast Cancer Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01632-5
_version_ 1827970210632564736
author Slavica Janeva
Ellen Krabbe
Toshima Z. Parris
Salmir Nasic
Marie Sundquist
Per Karlsson
Riccardo A. Audisio
Roger Olofsson Bagge
Anikó Kovács
author_facet Slavica Janeva
Ellen Krabbe
Toshima Z. Parris
Salmir Nasic
Marie Sundquist
Per Karlsson
Riccardo A. Audisio
Roger Olofsson Bagge
Anikó Kovács
author_sort Slavica Janeva
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background When ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer (IMBC) is detected, standard routine is to evaluate the largest tumor with immunohistochemistry (IHC). As all foci are not routinely characterized, many patients may not receive optimal adjuvant treatment. Here, we assess the clinical relevance of examining at least two foci present in patients with IMBC. Methods Patients diagnosed and treated for IMBC at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden) between 2012 and 2017 were screened. In total, 180 patients with ≥ 2 invasive foci (183 specimens) were assessed with IHC and included in this study. Expression of the estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, Ki67, HER2, and tumor grade were used to determine the molecular surrogate subtypes and discordance among the foci was recorded. An additional multidisciplinary team board was then held to re-assess whether treatment recommendations changed due to discordances in molecular surrogate subtype between the different foci. Results Discordance in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 was found in 2.7%, 19.1%, 7.7%, and 16.9% of invasive foci, respectively. Discordance in the molecular surrogate subtypes was found in 48 of 180 (26.7%) patients, which resulted in therapy changes for 11 patients (6.1%). These patients received additional endocrine therapy (n = 2), chemotherapy (n = 3), and combined chemotherapy and trastuzumab (n = 6). Conclusion Taken together, when assessing at least two tumor foci with IHC, regardless of shared morphology or tumor grade between the different foci, 6.1% of patients with IMBC were recommended additional adjuvant treatment. A pathologic assessment using IHC of all foci is therefore recommended to assist in individualized treatment decision making.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T18:50:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41153ac5c52c4a31bf5f1cb43f65d9f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1465-542X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T18:50:24Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Breast Cancer Research
spelling doaj.art-41153ac5c52c4a31bf5f1cb43f65d9f02023-04-09T11:30:19ZengBMCBreast Cancer Research1465-542X2023-04-0125111110.1186/s13058-023-01632-5Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancerSlavica Janeva0Ellen Krabbe1Toshima Z. Parris2Salmir Nasic3Marie Sundquist4Per Karlsson5Riccardo A. Audisio6Roger Olofsson Bagge7Anikó Kovács8Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Breast Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra GötalandDepartment of Surgery, Kungälv Hospital, Region Västra GötalandDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of GothenburgResearch and Development Centre, Skaraborg HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Kalmar County HospitalDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of GothenburgDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Breast Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra GötalandDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Breast Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra GötalandDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of GothenburgAbstract Background When ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer (IMBC) is detected, standard routine is to evaluate the largest tumor with immunohistochemistry (IHC). As all foci are not routinely characterized, many patients may not receive optimal adjuvant treatment. Here, we assess the clinical relevance of examining at least two foci present in patients with IMBC. Methods Patients diagnosed and treated for IMBC at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden) between 2012 and 2017 were screened. In total, 180 patients with ≥ 2 invasive foci (183 specimens) were assessed with IHC and included in this study. Expression of the estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, Ki67, HER2, and tumor grade were used to determine the molecular surrogate subtypes and discordance among the foci was recorded. An additional multidisciplinary team board was then held to re-assess whether treatment recommendations changed due to discordances in molecular surrogate subtype between the different foci. Results Discordance in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 was found in 2.7%, 19.1%, 7.7%, and 16.9% of invasive foci, respectively. Discordance in the molecular surrogate subtypes was found in 48 of 180 (26.7%) patients, which resulted in therapy changes for 11 patients (6.1%). These patients received additional endocrine therapy (n = 2), chemotherapy (n = 3), and combined chemotherapy and trastuzumab (n = 6). Conclusion Taken together, when assessing at least two tumor foci with IHC, regardless of shared morphology or tumor grade between the different foci, 6.1% of patients with IMBC were recommended additional adjuvant treatment. A pathologic assessment using IHC of all foci is therefore recommended to assist in individualized treatment decision making.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01632-5Multifocal breast cancerMulticentric breast cancerBiomarkersBreast cancer subtypesAdjuvant treatmentSynchronous
spellingShingle Slavica Janeva
Ellen Krabbe
Toshima Z. Parris
Salmir Nasic
Marie Sundquist
Per Karlsson
Riccardo A. Audisio
Roger Olofsson Bagge
Anikó Kovács
Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer
Breast Cancer Research
Multifocal breast cancer
Multicentric breast cancer
Biomarkers
Breast cancer subtypes
Adjuvant treatment
Synchronous
title Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer
title_full Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer
title_short Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer
title_sort clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer
topic Multifocal breast cancer
Multicentric breast cancer
Biomarkers
Breast cancer subtypes
Adjuvant treatment
Synchronous
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01632-5
work_keys_str_mv AT slavicajaneva clinicalevaluationofmolecularsurrogatesubtypesinpatientswithipsilateralmultifocalprimarybreastcancer
AT ellenkrabbe clinicalevaluationofmolecularsurrogatesubtypesinpatientswithipsilateralmultifocalprimarybreastcancer
AT toshimazparris clinicalevaluationofmolecularsurrogatesubtypesinpatientswithipsilateralmultifocalprimarybreastcancer
AT salmirnasic clinicalevaluationofmolecularsurrogatesubtypesinpatientswithipsilateralmultifocalprimarybreastcancer
AT mariesundquist clinicalevaluationofmolecularsurrogatesubtypesinpatientswithipsilateralmultifocalprimarybreastcancer
AT perkarlsson clinicalevaluationofmolecularsurrogatesubtypesinpatientswithipsilateralmultifocalprimarybreastcancer
AT riccardoaaudisio clinicalevaluationofmolecularsurrogatesubtypesinpatientswithipsilateralmultifocalprimarybreastcancer
AT rogerolofssonbagge clinicalevaluationofmolecularsurrogatesubtypesinpatientswithipsilateralmultifocalprimarybreastcancer
AT anikokovacs clinicalevaluationofmolecularsurrogatesubtypesinpatientswithipsilateralmultifocalprimarybreastcancer