Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democracies

Abstract Expanded international trade and globalised production networks are increasing the environmental and social impacts in middle-income countries (GNI per capita $1,136-$13,845). High-income countries (>$13,845) are seeking to mitigate the negative impacts of domestic consumption by imposin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Keith Smith, Dennis Kolcava, Thomas Bernauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2024-02-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45399-5
_version_ 1797274086373588992
author E. Keith Smith
Dennis Kolcava
Thomas Bernauer
author_facet E. Keith Smith
Dennis Kolcava
Thomas Bernauer
author_sort E. Keith Smith
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Expanded international trade and globalised production networks are increasing the environmental and social impacts in middle-income countries (GNI per capita $1,136-$13,845). High-income countries (>$13,845) are seeking to mitigate the negative impacts of domestic consumption by imposing new sustainability regulations on global supply chains. Recent evidence suggests that these regulations are broadly supported across high-income countries. However, it remains unclear whether citizens of middle-income countries support aligning domestic sustainability regulations with the measures developed by high-income countries. Concerns about economic competitiveness and foreign imposition could increase public resistance toward such alignment. Alternatively, desires for continued market access in high-income countries and aspirations for strengthening local environmental and labour regulations could foster support for alignment. Based on survey-embedded experiments in the three largest democratic non-OECD economies (Brazil, India, Indonesia), we find surprisingly strong support for domestic-based measures that are aligned with emerging global supply chain sustainability regulations. Our findings suggest that support is largely driven by positive impact expectations, where the future benefits of alignment are perceived as outweighing concerns about increased costs. These results bode well for initiatives to install stricter sustainability regulations for global supply chains that are acceptable not only in high-income economies but also in non-OECD countries.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:54:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4118d5e6a933405c9e59ee3caec8a7fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-1723
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:54:20Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj.art-4118d5e6a933405c9e59ee3caec8a7fb2024-03-05T19:31:44ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232024-02-0115111210.1038/s41467-024-45399-5Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democraciesE. Keith Smith0Dennis Kolcava1Thomas Bernauer2ETH ZürichVienna University of Economics and BusinessETH ZürichAbstract Expanded international trade and globalised production networks are increasing the environmental and social impacts in middle-income countries (GNI per capita $1,136-$13,845). High-income countries (>$13,845) are seeking to mitigate the negative impacts of domestic consumption by imposing new sustainability regulations on global supply chains. Recent evidence suggests that these regulations are broadly supported across high-income countries. However, it remains unclear whether citizens of middle-income countries support aligning domestic sustainability regulations with the measures developed by high-income countries. Concerns about economic competitiveness and foreign imposition could increase public resistance toward such alignment. Alternatively, desires for continued market access in high-income countries and aspirations for strengthening local environmental and labour regulations could foster support for alignment. Based on survey-embedded experiments in the three largest democratic non-OECD economies (Brazil, India, Indonesia), we find surprisingly strong support for domestic-based measures that are aligned with emerging global supply chain sustainability regulations. Our findings suggest that support is largely driven by positive impact expectations, where the future benefits of alignment are perceived as outweighing concerns about increased costs. These results bode well for initiatives to install stricter sustainability regulations for global supply chains that are acceptable not only in high-income economies but also in non-OECD countries.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45399-5
spellingShingle E. Keith Smith
Dennis Kolcava
Thomas Bernauer
Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democracies
Nature Communications
title Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democracies
title_full Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democracies
title_fullStr Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democracies
title_full_unstemmed Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democracies
title_short Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democracies
title_sort stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle income democracies
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45399-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ekeithsmith stringentsustainabilityregulationsforglobalsupplychainsaresupportedacrossmiddleincomedemocracies
AT denniskolcava stringentsustainabilityregulationsforglobalsupplychainsaresupportedacrossmiddleincomedemocracies
AT thomasbernauer stringentsustainabilityregulationsforglobalsupplychainsaresupportedacrossmiddleincomedemocracies