Fitts’ Law in the Control of Isometric Grip Force With Naturalistic Targets

Fitts’ law models the relationship between amplitude, precision, and speed of rapid movements. It is widely used to quantify performance in pointing tasks, study human-computer interaction, and generally to understand perceptual-motor information processes, including research to model performance in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zachary C. Thumser, Andrew B. Slifkin, Dylan T. Beckler, Paul D. Marasco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00560/full
_version_ 1828417785057771520
author Zachary C. Thumser
Zachary C. Thumser
Andrew B. Slifkin
Dylan T. Beckler
Paul D. Marasco
Paul D. Marasco
author_facet Zachary C. Thumser
Zachary C. Thumser
Andrew B. Slifkin
Dylan T. Beckler
Paul D. Marasco
Paul D. Marasco
author_sort Zachary C. Thumser
collection DOAJ
description Fitts’ law models the relationship between amplitude, precision, and speed of rapid movements. It is widely used to quantify performance in pointing tasks, study human-computer interaction, and generally to understand perceptual-motor information processes, including research to model performance in isometric force production tasks. Applying Fitts’ law to an isometric grip force task would allow for quantifying grasp performance in rehabilitative medicine and may aid research on prosthetic control and design. We examined whether Fitts’ law would hold when participants attempted to accurately produce their intended force output while grasping a manipulandum when presented with images of various everyday objects (we termed this the implicit task). Although our main interest was the implicit task, to benchmark it and establish validity, we examined performance against a more standard visual feedback condition via a digital force-feedback meter on a video monitor (explicit task). Next, we progressed from visual force feedback with force meter targets to the same targets without visual force feedback (operating largely on feedforward control with tactile feedback). This provided an opportunity to see if Fitts’ law would hold without vision, and allowed us to progress toward the more naturalistic implicit task (which does not include visual feedback). Finally, we changed the nature of the targets from requiring explicit force values presented as arrows on a force-feedback meter (explicit targets) to the more naturalistic and intuitive target forces implied by images of objects (implicit targets). With visual force feedback the relation between task difficulty and the time to produce the target grip force was predicted by Fitts’ law (average r2 = 0.82). Without vision, average grip force scaled accurately although force variability was insensitive to the target presented. In contrast, images of everyday objects generated more reliable grip forces without the visualized force meter. In sum, population means were well-described by Fitts’ law for explicit targets with vision (r2 = 0.96) and implicit targets (r2 = 0.89), but not as well-described for explicit targets without vision (r2 = 0.54). Implicit targets should provide a realistic see-object-squeeze-object test using Fitts’ law to quantify the relative speed-accuracy relationship of any given grasper.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T14:25:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-411a31fd4a47459189bd2425155b3538
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T14:25:53Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-411a31fd4a47459189bd2425155b35382022-12-22T01:45:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-04-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00560338434Fitts’ Law in the Control of Isometric Grip Force With Naturalistic TargetsZachary C. Thumser0Zachary C. Thumser1Andrew B. Slifkin2Dylan T. Beckler3Paul D. Marasco4Paul D. Marasco5Laboratory for Bionic Integration, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United StatesResearch Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, United StatesLaboratory for Bionic Integration, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United StatesLaboratory for Bionic Integration, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United StatesAdvanced Platform Technology Center of Excellence, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United StatesFitts’ law models the relationship between amplitude, precision, and speed of rapid movements. It is widely used to quantify performance in pointing tasks, study human-computer interaction, and generally to understand perceptual-motor information processes, including research to model performance in isometric force production tasks. Applying Fitts’ law to an isometric grip force task would allow for quantifying grasp performance in rehabilitative medicine and may aid research on prosthetic control and design. We examined whether Fitts’ law would hold when participants attempted to accurately produce their intended force output while grasping a manipulandum when presented with images of various everyday objects (we termed this the implicit task). Although our main interest was the implicit task, to benchmark it and establish validity, we examined performance against a more standard visual feedback condition via a digital force-feedback meter on a video monitor (explicit task). Next, we progressed from visual force feedback with force meter targets to the same targets without visual force feedback (operating largely on feedforward control with tactile feedback). This provided an opportunity to see if Fitts’ law would hold without vision, and allowed us to progress toward the more naturalistic implicit task (which does not include visual feedback). Finally, we changed the nature of the targets from requiring explicit force values presented as arrows on a force-feedback meter (explicit targets) to the more naturalistic and intuitive target forces implied by images of objects (implicit targets). With visual force feedback the relation between task difficulty and the time to produce the target grip force was predicted by Fitts’ law (average r2 = 0.82). Without vision, average grip force scaled accurately although force variability was insensitive to the target presented. In contrast, images of everyday objects generated more reliable grip forces without the visualized force meter. In sum, population means were well-described by Fitts’ law for explicit targets with vision (r2 = 0.96) and implicit targets (r2 = 0.89), but not as well-described for explicit targets without vision (r2 = 0.54). Implicit targets should provide a realistic see-object-squeeze-object test using Fitts’ law to quantify the relative speed-accuracy relationship of any given grasper.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00560/fullFitts’ lawforcegripgraspisometricvision
spellingShingle Zachary C. Thumser
Zachary C. Thumser
Andrew B. Slifkin
Dylan T. Beckler
Paul D. Marasco
Paul D. Marasco
Fitts’ Law in the Control of Isometric Grip Force With Naturalistic Targets
Frontiers in Psychology
Fitts’ law
force
grip
grasp
isometric
vision
title Fitts’ Law in the Control of Isometric Grip Force With Naturalistic Targets
title_full Fitts’ Law in the Control of Isometric Grip Force With Naturalistic Targets
title_fullStr Fitts’ Law in the Control of Isometric Grip Force With Naturalistic Targets
title_full_unstemmed Fitts’ Law in the Control of Isometric Grip Force With Naturalistic Targets
title_short Fitts’ Law in the Control of Isometric Grip Force With Naturalistic Targets
title_sort fitts law in the control of isometric grip force with naturalistic targets
topic Fitts’ law
force
grip
grasp
isometric
vision
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00560/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharycthumser fittslawinthecontrolofisometricgripforcewithnaturalistictargets
AT zacharycthumser fittslawinthecontrolofisometricgripforcewithnaturalistictargets
AT andrewbslifkin fittslawinthecontrolofisometricgripforcewithnaturalistictargets
AT dylantbeckler fittslawinthecontrolofisometricgripforcewithnaturalistictargets
AT pauldmarasco fittslawinthecontrolofisometricgripforcewithnaturalistictargets
AT pauldmarasco fittslawinthecontrolofisometricgripforcewithnaturalistictargets