Prediction of poor ovarian response during In vitro fertilization in Nigerian women: A comparison of basal antral follicle count and follicle-stimulating hormone

Background: Poor ovarian reserve has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Women who can be reliably identified as expected poor responders can be advised on chances of poor outcomes that may dissuade them from wasting resources on IVF using their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Tolulope Ejenobo, Nkeiruka Ameh, Joseph A M. Otubu, Bolarinde Ola, Ibrahim Wada, Augustine Monday Onuh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Nigerian Journal of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.njmonline.org/article.asp?issn=1115-2613;year=2022;volume=31;issue=6;spage=611;epage=617;aulast=Ejenobo
_version_ 1797775409337597952
author David Tolulope Ejenobo
Nkeiruka Ameh
Joseph A M. Otubu
Bolarinde Ola
Ibrahim Wada
Augustine Monday Onuh
author_facet David Tolulope Ejenobo
Nkeiruka Ameh
Joseph A M. Otubu
Bolarinde Ola
Ibrahim Wada
Augustine Monday Onuh
author_sort David Tolulope Ejenobo
collection DOAJ
description Background: Poor ovarian reserve has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Women who can be reliably identified as expected poor responders can be advised on chances of poor outcomes that may dissuade them from wasting resources on IVF using their own eggs; and offered donor eggs, especially in a resource-poor country like Nigeria. Many centres routinely perform basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) assay before IVF; however, basal antral follicle count (AFC) has emerged as a more reliable test of ovarian reserve that can be provided at a reduced cost compared to FSH in an IVF clinic setting. The determined predictive values of basal AFC compared to FSH in Nigerian women can be used to predict poor ovarian response during IVF treatment; and also to influence local clinical practice in IVF by offering a more reliable and affordable test, thereby avoiding wastage due to duplicate and unnecessary investigations. Aim: The aim is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of basal AFC compared to basal FSH for the prediction of ovarian response during the IVF cycle in Nigerian women. Patients, Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective comparative study in two private fertility centres in Abuja. Consecutive 166 women that underwent IVF treatment cycles who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. On day 2 to day 4 of a normal cycle, FSH assay and AFC using the Broekmans' systematic process were done. They had controlled ovarian hyperstimulation by antagonist or agonist and occasionally long protocols. The poor response was defined as <4 follicles of >17 mm on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin trigger or ≤3 oocytes retrieved. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was done to determine the level of the area under the curve (AUC) and optimum cut-off values of FSH and AFC in predicting poor ovarian response. Results: Twenty-eight (16.9%) had poor responses. ROC analysis demonstrated that AFC had the largest (AUC = 0.707, P = 0.001) relative to FSH (AUC = 0.591, P = 0.128). The ROC analysis showed that the optimum cut-off value for the prediction of poor response for AFC was ≤10, which had a higher accuracy of 67.5%, while for FSH was ≥8.15 mIU/ml with a lower accuracy of 61.5%. They both had the same sensitivity of 60.7%; however, AFC had better specificity, negative and positive predictive value, and higher odds ratio for the prediction of poor ovarian response. The positive and negative likelihood ratios of both cut-off values suggest that they may not be useful as diagnostic tests. Conclusion: ROC analysis estimated that AFC more accurately predicts poor ovarian response by its larger and more significant AUC compared to FSH in our population of women.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T22:35:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-413aa6caa06449559bec048c016be545
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1115-2613
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T22:35:19Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Nigerian Journal of Medicine
spelling doaj.art-413aa6caa06449559bec048c016be5452023-07-21T12:56:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsNigerian Journal of Medicine1115-26132022-01-0131661161710.4103/NJM.NJM_18_22Prediction of poor ovarian response during In vitro fertilization in Nigerian women: A comparison of basal antral follicle count and follicle-stimulating hormoneDavid Tolulope EjenoboNkeiruka AmehJoseph A M. OtubuBolarinde OlaIbrahim WadaAugustine Monday OnuhBackground: Poor ovarian reserve has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Women who can be reliably identified as expected poor responders can be advised on chances of poor outcomes that may dissuade them from wasting resources on IVF using their own eggs; and offered donor eggs, especially in a resource-poor country like Nigeria. Many centres routinely perform basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) assay before IVF; however, basal antral follicle count (AFC) has emerged as a more reliable test of ovarian reserve that can be provided at a reduced cost compared to FSH in an IVF clinic setting. The determined predictive values of basal AFC compared to FSH in Nigerian women can be used to predict poor ovarian response during IVF treatment; and also to influence local clinical practice in IVF by offering a more reliable and affordable test, thereby avoiding wastage due to duplicate and unnecessary investigations. Aim: The aim is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of basal AFC compared to basal FSH for the prediction of ovarian response during the IVF cycle in Nigerian women. Patients, Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective comparative study in two private fertility centres in Abuja. Consecutive 166 women that underwent IVF treatment cycles who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. On day 2 to day 4 of a normal cycle, FSH assay and AFC using the Broekmans' systematic process were done. They had controlled ovarian hyperstimulation by antagonist or agonist and occasionally long protocols. The poor response was defined as <4 follicles of >17 mm on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin trigger or ≤3 oocytes retrieved. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was done to determine the level of the area under the curve (AUC) and optimum cut-off values of FSH and AFC in predicting poor ovarian response. Results: Twenty-eight (16.9%) had poor responses. ROC analysis demonstrated that AFC had the largest (AUC = 0.707, P = 0.001) relative to FSH (AUC = 0.591, P = 0.128). The ROC analysis showed that the optimum cut-off value for the prediction of poor response for AFC was ≤10, which had a higher accuracy of 67.5%, while for FSH was ≥8.15 mIU/ml with a lower accuracy of 61.5%. They both had the same sensitivity of 60.7%; however, AFC had better specificity, negative and positive predictive value, and higher odds ratio for the prediction of poor ovarian response. The positive and negative likelihood ratios of both cut-off values suggest that they may not be useful as diagnostic tests. Conclusion: ROC analysis estimated that AFC more accurately predicts poor ovarian response by its larger and more significant AUC compared to FSH in our population of women.http://www.njmonline.org/article.asp?issn=1115-2613;year=2022;volume=31;issue=6;spage=611;epage=617;aulast=Ejenoboantral follicle countfollicle-stimulating hormonein-vitro fertilizationovarian reserveovarian response
spellingShingle David Tolulope Ejenobo
Nkeiruka Ameh
Joseph A M. Otubu
Bolarinde Ola
Ibrahim Wada
Augustine Monday Onuh
Prediction of poor ovarian response during In vitro fertilization in Nigerian women: A comparison of basal antral follicle count and follicle-stimulating hormone
Nigerian Journal of Medicine
antral follicle count
follicle-stimulating hormone
in-vitro fertilization
ovarian reserve
ovarian response
title Prediction of poor ovarian response during In vitro fertilization in Nigerian women: A comparison of basal antral follicle count and follicle-stimulating hormone
title_full Prediction of poor ovarian response during In vitro fertilization in Nigerian women: A comparison of basal antral follicle count and follicle-stimulating hormone
title_fullStr Prediction of poor ovarian response during In vitro fertilization in Nigerian women: A comparison of basal antral follicle count and follicle-stimulating hormone
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of poor ovarian response during In vitro fertilization in Nigerian women: A comparison of basal antral follicle count and follicle-stimulating hormone
title_short Prediction of poor ovarian response during In vitro fertilization in Nigerian women: A comparison of basal antral follicle count and follicle-stimulating hormone
title_sort prediction of poor ovarian response during in vitro fertilization in nigerian women a comparison of basal antral follicle count and follicle stimulating hormone
topic antral follicle count
follicle-stimulating hormone
in-vitro fertilization
ovarian reserve
ovarian response
url http://www.njmonline.org/article.asp?issn=1115-2613;year=2022;volume=31;issue=6;spage=611;epage=617;aulast=Ejenobo
work_keys_str_mv AT davidtolulopeejenobo predictionofpoorovarianresponseduringinvitrofertilizationinnigerianwomenacomparisonofbasalantralfolliclecountandfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT nkeirukaameh predictionofpoorovarianresponseduringinvitrofertilizationinnigerianwomenacomparisonofbasalantralfolliclecountandfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT josephamotubu predictionofpoorovarianresponseduringinvitrofertilizationinnigerianwomenacomparisonofbasalantralfolliclecountandfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT bolarindeola predictionofpoorovarianresponseduringinvitrofertilizationinnigerianwomenacomparisonofbasalantralfolliclecountandfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT ibrahimwada predictionofpoorovarianresponseduringinvitrofertilizationinnigerianwomenacomparisonofbasalantralfolliclecountandfolliclestimulatinghormone
AT augustinemondayonuh predictionofpoorovarianresponseduringinvitrofertilizationinnigerianwomenacomparisonofbasalantralfolliclecountandfolliclestimulatinghormone