Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodology

Muhammad M Hammami,1,2 Safa Hammami,1 Hala A Amer,1 Nesrine A Khodr1 1Clinical Studies and Empirical Ethics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, 2College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Background: Understanding culture-and sex-related end-of-life...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hammami MM, Hammami S, Amer HA, Khodr NA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2016-05-01
Series:Patient Preference and Adherence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/typology-of-end-of-life-priorities-in-saudi-females-averaging-analysis-peer-reviewed-article-PPA
_version_ 1818836856050024448
author Hammami MM
Hammami S
Amer HA
Khodr NA
author_facet Hammami MM
Hammami S
Amer HA
Khodr NA
author_sort Hammami MM
collection DOAJ
description Muhammad M Hammami,1,2 Safa Hammami,1 Hala A Amer,1 Nesrine A Khodr1 1Clinical Studies and Empirical Ethics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, 2College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Background: Understanding culture-and sex-related end-of-life preferences is essential to provide quality end-of-life care. We have previously explored end-of-life choices in Saudi males and found important culture-related differences and that Q-methodology is useful in identifying intraculture, opinion-based groups. Here, we explore Saudi females’ end-of-life choices.Methods: A volunteer sample of 68 females rank-ordered 47 opinion statements on end-of-life issues into a nine-category symmetrical distribution. The ranking scores of the statements were analyzed by averaging analysis and Q-methodology.Results: The mean age of the females in the sample was 30.3 years (range, 19–55 years). Among them, 51% reported average religiosity, 78% reported very good health, 79% reported very good life quality, and 100% reported high-school education or more. The extreme five overall priorities were to be able to say the statement of faith, be at peace with God, die without having the body exposed, maintain dignity, and resolve all conflicts. The extreme five overall dis-priorities were to die in the hospital, die well dressed, be informed about impending death by family/friends rather than doctor, die at peak of life, and not know if one has a fatal illness. Q-methodology identified five opinion-based groups with qualitatively different characteristics: “physical and emotional privacy concerned, family caring” (younger, lower religiosity), “whole person” (higher religiosity), “pain and informational privacy concerned” (lower life quality), “decisional privacy concerned” (older, higher life quality), and “life quantity concerned, family dependent” (high life quality, low life satisfaction). Out of the extreme 14 priorities/dis-priorities for each group, 21%–50% were not represented among the extreme 20 priorities/dis-priorities for the entire sample.Conclusion: Consistent with the previously reported findings in Saudi males, transcendence and dying in the hospital were the extreme end-of-life priority and dis-priority, respectively, in Saudi females. Body modesty was a major overall concern; however, concerns about pain, various types of privacy, and life quantity were variably emphasized by the five opinion-based groups but masked by averaging analysis. Keywords: end-of-life priorities, end-of-life dis-priorities, Q-methodology, score-averaging, Muslims, Saudi females
first_indexed 2024-12-19T03:13:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41416a0feb4f488487942e9dbaba4f5b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-889X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T03:13:15Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Patient Preference and Adherence
spelling doaj.art-41416a0feb4f488487942e9dbaba4f5b2022-12-21T20:37:58ZengDove Medical PressPatient Preference and Adherence1177-889X2016-05-012016Issue 178179426921Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodologyHammami MMHammami SAmer HAKhodr NAMuhammad M Hammami,1,2 Safa Hammami,1 Hala A Amer,1 Nesrine A Khodr1 1Clinical Studies and Empirical Ethics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, 2College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Background: Understanding culture-and sex-related end-of-life preferences is essential to provide quality end-of-life care. We have previously explored end-of-life choices in Saudi males and found important culture-related differences and that Q-methodology is useful in identifying intraculture, opinion-based groups. Here, we explore Saudi females’ end-of-life choices.Methods: A volunteer sample of 68 females rank-ordered 47 opinion statements on end-of-life issues into a nine-category symmetrical distribution. The ranking scores of the statements were analyzed by averaging analysis and Q-methodology.Results: The mean age of the females in the sample was 30.3 years (range, 19–55 years). Among them, 51% reported average religiosity, 78% reported very good health, 79% reported very good life quality, and 100% reported high-school education or more. The extreme five overall priorities were to be able to say the statement of faith, be at peace with God, die without having the body exposed, maintain dignity, and resolve all conflicts. The extreme five overall dis-priorities were to die in the hospital, die well dressed, be informed about impending death by family/friends rather than doctor, die at peak of life, and not know if one has a fatal illness. Q-methodology identified five opinion-based groups with qualitatively different characteristics: “physical and emotional privacy concerned, family caring” (younger, lower religiosity), “whole person” (higher religiosity), “pain and informational privacy concerned” (lower life quality), “decisional privacy concerned” (older, higher life quality), and “life quantity concerned, family dependent” (high life quality, low life satisfaction). Out of the extreme 14 priorities/dis-priorities for each group, 21%–50% were not represented among the extreme 20 priorities/dis-priorities for the entire sample.Conclusion: Consistent with the previously reported findings in Saudi males, transcendence and dying in the hospital were the extreme end-of-life priority and dis-priority, respectively, in Saudi females. Body modesty was a major overall concern; however, concerns about pain, various types of privacy, and life quantity were variably emphasized by the five opinion-based groups but masked by averaging analysis. Keywords: end-of-life priorities, end-of-life dis-priorities, Q-methodology, score-averaging, Muslims, Saudi femaleshttps://www.dovepress.com/typology-of-end-of-life-priorities-in-saudi-females-averaging-analysis-peer-reviewed-article-PPAEnd-of-life prioritiesEnd-of-life dis-prioritiesQ-methodologyScore-averagingMuslimsSaudi females
spellingShingle Hammami MM
Hammami S
Amer HA
Khodr NA
Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodology
Patient Preference and Adherence
End-of-life priorities
End-of-life dis-priorities
Q-methodology
Score-averaging
Muslims
Saudi females
title Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodology
title_full Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodology
title_fullStr Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodology
title_full_unstemmed Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodology
title_short Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodology
title_sort typology of end of life priorities in saudi females averaging analysis and q methodology
topic End-of-life priorities
End-of-life dis-priorities
Q-methodology
Score-averaging
Muslims
Saudi females
url https://www.dovepress.com/typology-of-end-of-life-priorities-in-saudi-females-averaging-analysis-peer-reviewed-article-PPA
work_keys_str_mv AT hammamimm typologyofendoflifeprioritiesinsaudifemalesaveraginganalysisandqmethodology
AT hammamis typologyofendoflifeprioritiesinsaudifemalesaveraginganalysisandqmethodology
AT amerha typologyofendoflifeprioritiesinsaudifemalesaveraginganalysisandqmethodology
AT khodrna typologyofendoflifeprioritiesinsaudifemalesaveraginganalysisandqmethodology