The challenge of radical reform in pluralist democracies

Martijn Hesselink proposes a new European charter of private law that would correct the deficiencies in private law identified by Katharina Pistor. While Hesselink aims to achieve radical reform by way of radical democracy, this article argues that radical democracy is unlikely to realise a radicall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aditi Bagchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-06-01
Series:European Law Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613522000273/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156365101498368
author Aditi Bagchi
author_facet Aditi Bagchi
author_sort Aditi Bagchi
collection DOAJ
description Martijn Hesselink proposes a new European charter of private law that would correct the deficiencies in private law identified by Katharina Pistor. While Hesselink aims to achieve radical reform by way of radical democracy, this article argues that radical democracy is unlikely to realise a radically progressive vision of private law. Citizens of wealthy, post-industrial democracies lack certainty about both the material consequences of reform and the demands of justice. Because their caution renders them averse to far-reaching, bundled reform packages, public discourse in post-industrial societies as we find them is more likely to produce incremental than radical substantive reform.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:50:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-414f2e6ad48d404d88c5cf78449df3f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2752-6135
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:50:17Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series European Law Open
spelling doaj.art-414f2e6ad48d404d88c5cf78449df3f92023-03-09T12:32:19ZengCambridge University PressEuropean Law Open2752-61352022-06-01137437910.1017/elo.2022.27The challenge of radical reform in pluralist democraciesAditi Bagchi0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9852-507XFordham University School of Law, New York City, USAMartijn Hesselink proposes a new European charter of private law that would correct the deficiencies in private law identified by Katharina Pistor. While Hesselink aims to achieve radical reform by way of radical democracy, this article argues that radical democracy is unlikely to realise a radically progressive vision of private law. Citizens of wealthy, post-industrial democracies lack certainty about both the material consequences of reform and the demands of justice. Because their caution renders them averse to far-reaching, bundled reform packages, public discourse in post-industrial societies as we find them is more likely to produce incremental than radical substantive reform.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613522000273/type/journal_articleprivate lawdemocratic theorycapitalismradicalism
spellingShingle Aditi Bagchi
The challenge of radical reform in pluralist democracies
European Law Open
private law
democratic theory
capitalism
radicalism
title The challenge of radical reform in pluralist democracies
title_full The challenge of radical reform in pluralist democracies
title_fullStr The challenge of radical reform in pluralist democracies
title_full_unstemmed The challenge of radical reform in pluralist democracies
title_short The challenge of radical reform in pluralist democracies
title_sort challenge of radical reform in pluralist democracies
topic private law
democratic theory
capitalism
radicalism
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613522000273/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT aditibagchi thechallengeofradicalreforminpluralistdemocracies
AT aditibagchi challengeofradicalreforminpluralistdemocracies