Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy

Abstract Background Synthesis of psychometric properties of substance use measures to identify patterns of use and substance use disorders remains limited. To address this gap, we sought to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties of measures to detect substance use and misuse. Methods We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Glenn-Milo Santos, Steffanie A. Strathdee, Nabila El-Bassel, Poonam Patel, Divya Subramanian, Danielle Horyniak, Ryan R. Cook, Charlotte McCullagh, Phillip Marotta, Foram Choksi, Brian Kang, Isabel Allen, Steven Shoptaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00963-7
_version_ 1818061565380788224
author Glenn-Milo Santos
Steffanie A. Strathdee
Nabila El-Bassel
Poonam Patel
Divya Subramanian
Danielle Horyniak
Ryan R. Cook
Charlotte McCullagh
Phillip Marotta
Foram Choksi
Brian Kang
Isabel Allen
Steven Shoptaw
author_facet Glenn-Milo Santos
Steffanie A. Strathdee
Nabila El-Bassel
Poonam Patel
Divya Subramanian
Danielle Horyniak
Ryan R. Cook
Charlotte McCullagh
Phillip Marotta
Foram Choksi
Brian Kang
Isabel Allen
Steven Shoptaw
author_sort Glenn-Milo Santos
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Synthesis of psychometric properties of substance use measures to identify patterns of use and substance use disorders remains limited. To address this gap, we sought to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties of measures to detect substance use and misuse. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature on measures of substance classes associated with HIV risk (heroin, methamphetamine, cocaine, ecstasy, alcohol) that were published in English before June 2016 that reported at least one of the following psychometric outcomes of interest: internal consistency (alpha), test-retest/inter-rater reliability (kappa), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. We used meta-analytic techniques to generate pooled summary estimates for these outcomes using random effects and hierarchical logistic regression models. Results Findings across 387 paper revealed that overall, 65% of pooled estimates for alpha were in the range of fair-to-excellent; 44% of estimates for kappa were in the range of fair-to-excellent. In addition, 69, 97, 37 and 96% of pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively, were in the range of moderate-to-excellent. Conclusion We conclude that many substance use measures had pooled summary estimates that were at the fair/moderate-to-excellent range across different psychometric outcomes. Most scales were conducted in English, within the United States, highlighting the need to test and validate these measures in more diverse settings. Additionally, the majority of studies had high risk of bias, indicating a need for more studies with higher methodological quality.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:50:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41582a9c6ea94c2481acb2a95fccdbef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:50:20Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-41582a9c6ea94c2481acb2a95fccdbef2022-12-22T01:46:13ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882020-05-0120112210.1186/s12874-020-00963-7Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracyGlenn-Milo Santos0Steffanie A. Strathdee1Nabila El-Bassel2Poonam Patel3Divya Subramanian4Danielle Horyniak5Ryan R. Cook6Charlotte McCullagh7Phillip Marotta8Foram Choksi9Brian Kang10Isabel Allen11Steven Shoptaw12Department of Community Health Systems, University of California San FranciscoDivision of Global Public Health, University of California San DiegoSchool of Social Work, Columbia UniversityCenter for Public Health Research, San Francisco Department of Public HealthCenter for Public Health Research, San Francisco Department of Public HealthDivision of Global Public Health, University of California San DiegoDepartment of Family Medicine and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los AngelesSchool of Social Work, Columbia UniversitySchool of Social Work, Columbia UniversityCenter for Public Health Research, San Francisco Department of Public HealthCenter for Public Health Research, San Francisco Department of Public HealthDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San FranciscoDepartment of Family Medicine and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los AngelesAbstract Background Synthesis of psychometric properties of substance use measures to identify patterns of use and substance use disorders remains limited. To address this gap, we sought to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties of measures to detect substance use and misuse. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature on measures of substance classes associated with HIV risk (heroin, methamphetamine, cocaine, ecstasy, alcohol) that were published in English before June 2016 that reported at least one of the following psychometric outcomes of interest: internal consistency (alpha), test-retest/inter-rater reliability (kappa), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. We used meta-analytic techniques to generate pooled summary estimates for these outcomes using random effects and hierarchical logistic regression models. Results Findings across 387 paper revealed that overall, 65% of pooled estimates for alpha were in the range of fair-to-excellent; 44% of estimates for kappa were in the range of fair-to-excellent. In addition, 69, 97, 37 and 96% of pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively, were in the range of moderate-to-excellent. Conclusion We conclude that many substance use measures had pooled summary estimates that were at the fair/moderate-to-excellent range across different psychometric outcomes. Most scales were conducted in English, within the United States, highlighting the need to test and validate these measures in more diverse settings. Additionally, the majority of studies had high risk of bias, indicating a need for more studies with higher methodological quality.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00963-7Substance useAlcoholDrugsPsychometric propertiesMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Glenn-Milo Santos
Steffanie A. Strathdee
Nabila El-Bassel
Poonam Patel
Divya Subramanian
Danielle Horyniak
Ryan R. Cook
Charlotte McCullagh
Phillip Marotta
Foram Choksi
Brian Kang
Isabel Allen
Steven Shoptaw
Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Substance use
Alcohol
Drugs
Psychometric properties
Meta-analysis
title Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy
title_full Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy
title_short Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy
title_sort psychometric properties of measures of substance use a systematic review and meta analysis of reliability validity and diagnostic test accuracy
topic Substance use
Alcohol
Drugs
Psychometric properties
Meta-analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00963-7
work_keys_str_mv AT glennmilosantos psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT steffanieastrathdee psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT nabilaelbassel psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT poonampatel psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT divyasubramanian psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT daniellehoryniak psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT ryanrcook psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT charlottemccullagh psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT phillipmarotta psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT foramchoksi psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT briankang psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT isabelallen psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy
AT stevenshoptaw psychometricpropertiesofmeasuresofsubstanceuseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofreliabilityvalidityanddiagnostictestaccuracy