The CV is dead, long live the CV!
Abstract Biology has an increasing need to reconsider the tools used to assess the variability of measurements, in addition to their central tendency. More than 100 years after Pearson's publication, most biologists still use the “good old” Pearson's coefficient of variation, PCV, despite...
Main Authors: | Jean R. Lobry, Marie‐Claude Bel‐Venner, Michał Bogdziewicz, Andrew Hacket‐Pain, Samuel Venner |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Methods in Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14197 |
Similar Items
-
Testing the Validity of CV for Single-Plant Yield in the Absence of Competition as a Homeostasis Index
by: Ioannis S. Tokatlidis, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Studies on genetic variability for important traits in F2 generations of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
by: C. K. Patel, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Entropy and coefficient of variation (CV) as tools for assessing power quality
by: J. H. Estrada, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Heart Rate Variability Responses to an Undulating Resistance Training Program in Free-Living Conditions: A Case Study in a Collegiate Athlete
by: Clifton J. Holmes, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Geotechnical Parameters of Landslide-Prone Laflamme Sea Deposits, Canada: Uncertainties and Correlations
by: Amande-Gaston Sanou, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)