Diagnosis of Subclinical Keratoconus with a Combined Model of Biomechanical and Topographic Parameters

This study sought to develop a diagnostic model with aberrometry and biomechanical variables for subclinical keratoconus. The design was a cross-sectional study. The topographic data were obtained with a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR), and biomechanical data were obtained with Corvis ST....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Pérez-Rueda, Diana Jiménez-Rodríguez, Gracia Castro-Luna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/13/2746
_version_ 1797529145052233728
author Antonio Pérez-Rueda
Diana Jiménez-Rodríguez
Gracia Castro-Luna
author_facet Antonio Pérez-Rueda
Diana Jiménez-Rodríguez
Gracia Castro-Luna
author_sort Antonio Pérez-Rueda
collection DOAJ
description This study sought to develop a diagnostic model with aberrometry and biomechanical variables for subclinical keratoconus. The design was a cross-sectional study. The topographic data were obtained with a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR), and biomechanical data were obtained with Corvis ST. The study included 81 eyes distributed in 61 healthy corneas and 20 subclinical keratoconus (SCKC), defined as eyes with suspicious topographic findings, normal slit-lamp examination, and a manifestation of keratoconus. Analyses of the topographic and biomechanical data were performed, and a classifying model of SCKC was elaborated. The model for the diagnosis of SCKC includes posterior coma to 90°, Ambrósio’s Relational Thickness in the horizontal profile (ARTh), and velocity when the air pulse is off (A2 velocity). The sensitivity was 89.5%, specificity 96.7%, accuracy 94.9%, and precision 89.5%. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the model was 0.951. Diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus depends on the aberrometry variable posterior coma to 90° and the biomechanical variables A2 velocity and ARTh.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:09:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-419717bfcfa94edb9d21678cbd5dbfb0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:09:34Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-419717bfcfa94edb9d21678cbd5dbfb02023-11-22T01:14:53ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-06-011013274610.3390/jcm10132746Diagnosis of Subclinical Keratoconus with a Combined Model of Biomechanical and Topographic ParametersAntonio Pérez-Rueda0Diana Jiménez-Rodríguez1Gracia Castro-Luna2Department of Ophthalmology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, 04009 Almería, SpainDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, SpainDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, SpainThis study sought to develop a diagnostic model with aberrometry and biomechanical variables for subclinical keratoconus. The design was a cross-sectional study. The topographic data were obtained with a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR), and biomechanical data were obtained with Corvis ST. The study included 81 eyes distributed in 61 healthy corneas and 20 subclinical keratoconus (SCKC), defined as eyes with suspicious topographic findings, normal slit-lamp examination, and a manifestation of keratoconus. Analyses of the topographic and biomechanical data were performed, and a classifying model of SCKC was elaborated. The model for the diagnosis of SCKC includes posterior coma to 90°, Ambrósio’s Relational Thickness in the horizontal profile (ARTh), and velocity when the air pulse is off (A2 velocity). The sensitivity was 89.5%, specificity 96.7%, accuracy 94.9%, and precision 89.5%. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the model was 0.951. Diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus depends on the aberrometry variable posterior coma to 90° and the biomechanical variables A2 velocity and ARTh.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/13/2746subclinical keratoconustopographybiomechanicsCorvis ST
spellingShingle Antonio Pérez-Rueda
Diana Jiménez-Rodríguez
Gracia Castro-Luna
Diagnosis of Subclinical Keratoconus with a Combined Model of Biomechanical and Topographic Parameters
Journal of Clinical Medicine
subclinical keratoconus
topography
biomechanics
Corvis ST
title Diagnosis of Subclinical Keratoconus with a Combined Model of Biomechanical and Topographic Parameters
title_full Diagnosis of Subclinical Keratoconus with a Combined Model of Biomechanical and Topographic Parameters
title_fullStr Diagnosis of Subclinical Keratoconus with a Combined Model of Biomechanical and Topographic Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of Subclinical Keratoconus with a Combined Model of Biomechanical and Topographic Parameters
title_short Diagnosis of Subclinical Keratoconus with a Combined Model of Biomechanical and Topographic Parameters
title_sort diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus with a combined model of biomechanical and topographic parameters
topic subclinical keratoconus
topography
biomechanics
Corvis ST
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/13/2746
work_keys_str_mv AT antonioperezrueda diagnosisofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithacombinedmodelofbiomechanicalandtopographicparameters
AT dianajimenezrodriguez diagnosisofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithacombinedmodelofbiomechanicalandtopographicparameters
AT graciacastroluna diagnosisofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithacombinedmodelofbiomechanicalandtopographicparameters