Comparison of minimally invasive and open TLIF outcomes with more than seven years of follow-up
Background: Few studies directly comparing minimally invasive (MI) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and open TLIF offering long-term follow-up data have been performed to date. Therefore, we sought to compare mid- to long-term outcomes between these two surgical approaches. Methods: Thi...
Main Authors: | Jae-Young Hong, Won Seok Kim, Jiwon Park, Chi Heon Kim, Hae-Dong Jang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-09-01
|
Series: | North American Spine Society Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548422000348 |
Similar Items
-
Comparative analysis of the effects of OLIF and TLIF on adjacent segments after treatment of L4 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
by: Guang-qing Li, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Comparison of results among UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF and open TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study
by: Zhenyuan Lu, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis
by: Ahmed Hammad, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Clinical efficacy and complications of MIS-TLIF and TLIF in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study
by: Bochen An, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01) -
Comparison of safety and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases
by: Ming Chen, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)