Stress testing journals: a quasi-experimental study of rejection rates of a previously published paper
Abstract Background When a journal receives a duplicate publication, the ability to identify the submitted work as previously published, and reject it, is an assay to publication ethics best practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate how three different types of journals, namely open access (O...
Main Authors: | Kelly D. Cobey, Danielle B. Rice, Manoj M. Lalu, Daniel Abramowitz, Nadera Ahmadzai, Heather Cunningham, Ana Patricia Ayala, Hana Raffoul, Faizan Khan, Larissa Shamseer, David Moher |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-020-01550-9 |
Similar Items
-
Plagiarism and Predatory Publishing
by: Roberto N. Padua
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Predatory publishing practices: what researchers should know before submitting their manuscript
by: Cenyu Shen, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Open access and predatory publishing: a survey of the publishing practices of academic pharmacists and nurses in the United States
by: Bridget C. Conlogue, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Who is Actually Harmed by Predatory Publishers?
by: Martin Paul Eve, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Impact and perceived value of the revolutionary advent of artificial intelligence in research and publishing among researchers: a survey-based descriptive study
by: Riya Thomas, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)