COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
Abstract Background Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important source of bias in trials. Despite legislation, guidelines and public commitments on correct reporting from journals, outcome misreporting continues to be prevalent. We aimed to document the extent of misre...
Main Authors: | Ben Goldacre, Henry Drysdale, Aaron Dale, Ioan Milosevic, Eirion Slade, Philip Hartley, Cicely Marston, Anna Powell-Smith, Carl Heneghan, Kamal R. Mahtani |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-02-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3173-2 |
Similar Items
-
COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials
by: Ben Goldacre, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
by: Goldacre, B, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Estimation of misreporting probability in corporate credit rating: A nonparametric approach
by: Ruichang Lu, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Energy intake misreport: how different methods affect its prevalence and nutrient intake estimates
by: Vânia Magalhães, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
Correcting Misreported Multinomial Outcome Data Based on Logistic Regression Model with Application to Stroke Mortality in Thailand
by: Arinda MA-A-LEE, et al.
Published: (2017-02-01)