On Recording the Unipolar ECG Limb Leads via the Wilson's vs the Goldberger's Terminals: aVR, aVL, and aVF Revisited

The augmented unipolar limb leads aVR, aVL, and aVF, introduced by Goldberger in 1942, are an integral part of the 12-lead ECG.1,2 Leads I, II, and III have 2 dedicated electrodes, but the other 9 leads have a single dedicated electrode, and another one constructed from the averaged inputs of multi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John E. Madias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2008-11-01
Series:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ipej.org/0804/madias4.htm
_version_ 1818520520985935872
author John E. Madias
author_facet John E. Madias
author_sort John E. Madias
collection DOAJ
description The augmented unipolar limb leads aVR, aVL, and aVF, introduced by Goldberger in 1942, are an integral part of the 12-lead ECG.1,2 Leads I, II, and III have 2 dedicated electrodes, but the other 9 leads have a single dedicated electrode, and another one constructed from the averaged inputs of multiple electrodes. This Viewpoint discusses whether an indifferent pole for the recording of unipolar limb leads is best provided by the Wilson's central terminal (WCT), or by inputs from 2 limb electrodes (Goldberger's central terminal) (GCT), as done currently, and whether the latter have any advantages over the former. The term "unipolar", popularized by Wilson, is a misnomer, since no leads can be truly "unipolar", all requiring positive and negative poles. Thus the term unipolar is used herein in the quasi-unipolar sense, as when first introduced by Wilson and Goldberger, who also realized that such leads were not truly unipolar. The popularity of the unipolar leads reflected the quest of recording the ECG from various vantage points of the body, considering the limitations of the 3 bipolar leads, introduced by Einthoven,3 which register the difference of 2 ECG curves recorded at the 2 poles of these leads, and no variation in potential at each of these poles.4 In contrast the unipolar leads were thought to register such variation of absolute potential, something not really true. Initially the WCT was used to record the unipolar limb leads,5 but the amplitude was low, and the inscribed ECGs, then, and for many decades later,6 were thick-lined (≥2 mm) (Figure 1).
first_indexed 2024-12-11T01:38:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41c4588fd89547fcb247deaca52a25a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-6292
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T01:38:37Z
publishDate 2008-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
spelling doaj.art-41c4588fd89547fcb247deaca52a25a82022-12-22T01:25:07ZengElsevierIndian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal0972-62922008-11-0184292297On Recording the Unipolar ECG Limb Leads via the Wilson's vs the Goldberger's Terminals: aVR, aVL, and aVF RevisitedJohn E. MadiasThe augmented unipolar limb leads aVR, aVL, and aVF, introduced by Goldberger in 1942, are an integral part of the 12-lead ECG.1,2 Leads I, II, and III have 2 dedicated electrodes, but the other 9 leads have a single dedicated electrode, and another one constructed from the averaged inputs of multiple electrodes. This Viewpoint discusses whether an indifferent pole for the recording of unipolar limb leads is best provided by the Wilson's central terminal (WCT), or by inputs from 2 limb electrodes (Goldberger's central terminal) (GCT), as done currently, and whether the latter have any advantages over the former. The term "unipolar", popularized by Wilson, is a misnomer, since no leads can be truly "unipolar", all requiring positive and negative poles. Thus the term unipolar is used herein in the quasi-unipolar sense, as when first introduced by Wilson and Goldberger, who also realized that such leads were not truly unipolar. The popularity of the unipolar leads reflected the quest of recording the ECG from various vantage points of the body, considering the limitations of the 3 bipolar leads, introduced by Einthoven,3 which register the difference of 2 ECG curves recorded at the 2 poles of these leads, and no variation in potential at each of these poles.4 In contrast the unipolar leads were thought to register such variation of absolute potential, something not really true. Initially the WCT was used to record the unipolar limb leads,5 but the amplitude was low, and the inscribed ECGs, then, and for many decades later,6 were thick-lined (≥2 mm) (Figure 1).http://www.ipej.org/0804/madias4.htmaugmented unipolar limb leadsWilson's central terminalGoldberger's central terminal
spellingShingle John E. Madias
On Recording the Unipolar ECG Limb Leads via the Wilson's vs the Goldberger's Terminals: aVR, aVL, and aVF Revisited
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
augmented unipolar limb leads
Wilson's central terminal
Goldberger's central terminal
title On Recording the Unipolar ECG Limb Leads via the Wilson's vs the Goldberger's Terminals: aVR, aVL, and aVF Revisited
title_full On Recording the Unipolar ECG Limb Leads via the Wilson's vs the Goldberger's Terminals: aVR, aVL, and aVF Revisited
title_fullStr On Recording the Unipolar ECG Limb Leads via the Wilson's vs the Goldberger's Terminals: aVR, aVL, and aVF Revisited
title_full_unstemmed On Recording the Unipolar ECG Limb Leads via the Wilson's vs the Goldberger's Terminals: aVR, aVL, and aVF Revisited
title_short On Recording the Unipolar ECG Limb Leads via the Wilson's vs the Goldberger's Terminals: aVR, aVL, and aVF Revisited
title_sort on recording the unipolar ecg limb leads via the wilson s vs the goldberger s terminals avr avl and avf revisited
topic augmented unipolar limb leads
Wilson's central terminal
Goldberger's central terminal
url http://www.ipej.org/0804/madias4.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT johnemadias onrecordingtheunipolarecglimbleadsviathewilsonsvsthegoldbergersterminalsavravlandavfrevisited