In Search of the Executive Cognitive Processes Proposed by Process-Overlap Theory

Process-Overlap Theory (POT) suggests that measures of cognitive abilities sample from sets of independent cognitive processes. These cognitive processes can be separated into domain-general executive processes, sampled by the majority of cognitive ability measures, and domain-specific processes, sa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gidon T. Frischkorn, Claudia C. von Bastian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/3/43
_version_ 1797518652479635456
author Gidon T. Frischkorn
Claudia C. von Bastian
author_facet Gidon T. Frischkorn
Claudia C. von Bastian
author_sort Gidon T. Frischkorn
collection DOAJ
description Process-Overlap Theory (POT) suggests that measures of cognitive abilities sample from sets of independent cognitive processes. These cognitive processes can be separated into domain-general executive processes, sampled by the majority of cognitive ability measures, and domain-specific processes, sampled only by measures within a certain domain. According to POT, fluid intelligence measures are related because different tests sample similar domain-general executive cognitive processes to some extent. Re-analyzing data from a study by De Simoni and von Bastian (2018), we assessed domain-general variance from executive processing tasks measuring inhibition, shifting, and efficiency of removal from working memory, as well as examined their relation to a domain-general factor extracted from fluid intelligence measures. The results showed that domain-general factors reflecting general processing speed were moderately and negatively correlated with the domain-general fluid intelligence factor (<i>r</i> = −.17–−.36). However, domain-general factors isolating variance specific to inhibition, shifting, and removal showed only small and inconsistent correlations with the domain-general fluid intelligence factor (<i>r</i> = .02–−.22). These findings suggest that (1) executive processing tasks sample only few domain-general executive processes also sampled by fluid intelligence measures, as well as (2) that domain-general speed of processing contributes more strongly to individual differences in fluid intelligence than do domain-general executive processes.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:32:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41cee56f4e7547df9eb9b84d381e1630
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-3200
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T07:32:45Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Intelligence
spelling doaj.art-41cee56f4e7547df9eb9b84d381e16302023-11-22T13:44:31ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002021-08-01934310.3390/jintelligence9030043In Search of the Executive Cognitive Processes Proposed by Process-Overlap TheoryGidon T. Frischkorn0Claudia C. von Bastian1Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Binzmuehlestrasse 14, 8050 Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Psychology, University Sheffield, Sheffield S1 1HD, UKProcess-Overlap Theory (POT) suggests that measures of cognitive abilities sample from sets of independent cognitive processes. These cognitive processes can be separated into domain-general executive processes, sampled by the majority of cognitive ability measures, and domain-specific processes, sampled only by measures within a certain domain. According to POT, fluid intelligence measures are related because different tests sample similar domain-general executive cognitive processes to some extent. Re-analyzing data from a study by De Simoni and von Bastian (2018), we assessed domain-general variance from executive processing tasks measuring inhibition, shifting, and efficiency of removal from working memory, as well as examined their relation to a domain-general factor extracted from fluid intelligence measures. The results showed that domain-general factors reflecting general processing speed were moderately and negatively correlated with the domain-general fluid intelligence factor (<i>r</i> = −.17–−.36). However, domain-general factors isolating variance specific to inhibition, shifting, and removal showed only small and inconsistent correlations with the domain-general fluid intelligence factor (<i>r</i> = .02–−.22). These findings suggest that (1) executive processing tasks sample only few domain-general executive processes also sampled by fluid intelligence measures, as well as (2) that domain-general speed of processing contributes more strongly to individual differences in fluid intelligence than do domain-general executive processes.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/3/43intelligenceexecutive processesworking memoryprocessing speedProcess-Overlap Theory
spellingShingle Gidon T. Frischkorn
Claudia C. von Bastian
In Search of the Executive Cognitive Processes Proposed by Process-Overlap Theory
Journal of Intelligence
intelligence
executive processes
working memory
processing speed
Process-Overlap Theory
title In Search of the Executive Cognitive Processes Proposed by Process-Overlap Theory
title_full In Search of the Executive Cognitive Processes Proposed by Process-Overlap Theory
title_fullStr In Search of the Executive Cognitive Processes Proposed by Process-Overlap Theory
title_full_unstemmed In Search of the Executive Cognitive Processes Proposed by Process-Overlap Theory
title_short In Search of the Executive Cognitive Processes Proposed by Process-Overlap Theory
title_sort in search of the executive cognitive processes proposed by process overlap theory
topic intelligence
executive processes
working memory
processing speed
Process-Overlap Theory
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/3/43
work_keys_str_mv AT gidontfrischkorn insearchoftheexecutivecognitiveprocessesproposedbyprocessoverlaptheory
AT claudiacvonbastian insearchoftheexecutivecognitiveprocessesproposedbyprocessoverlaptheory