RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL PROOF OF THE CRIME HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Indonesia is a country that operates a democratic system. A democratic government system is characterized by freedom of each individual to express his opinion in any way that is protected by the state constitution. The rules discussing freedom of opinion are in Article 1 paragraph (1) in Law Number...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sari A.G., Warka M., Budiarsih, Hadi S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: iVolga Press 2023-12-01
Series:Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rjoas.com/issue-2023-12/article_15.pdf
_version_ 1797367004150104064
author Sari A.G.
Warka M.
Budiarsih
Hadi S.
author_facet Sari A.G.
Warka M.
Budiarsih
Hadi S.
author_sort Sari A.G.
collection DOAJ
description Indonesia is a country that operates a democratic system. A democratic government system is characterized by freedom of each individual to express his opinion in any way that is protected by the state constitution. The rules discussing freedom of opinion are in Article 1 paragraph (1) in Law Number 9 of 1998 concerning Freedom to Express Opinions in Public. In the provisions of this law, every citizen has the right to voice their ideas orally, in writing and through other means without any obstacles, while still carrying out their responsibilities in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations. This law acts as an implementation in Article 28 of 1945 Constitution Republic Indonesia which states: "Freedom of association and assembly, expressing thoughts verbally and in writing and so on is determined by law. The legal provisions governing legally proven crimes of hate speech involve several articles in statutory regulations. These articles include Article 156, Article 157, Article 310, and Article 311 of the Criminal Code, Article 28 paragraph (2) juncto. Article 45A paragraph (2) in Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, and Article 16 in Law Number 40 of 2008 concerning the Elimination of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination. The legal principle used is lex specialis derogat legi generali which will accommodate accountability for every violation of hate speech on social media, with reference to Article 28 paragraph (2) juncto. Article 45A paragraph (2) of the ITE Law stipulates that the length of imprisonment is 6 years and/or a maximum fine of one billion Rupiah.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:11:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41d2fd58086044da97381f201ae2bac0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-1184
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:11:40Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher iVolga Press
record_format Article
series Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences
spelling doaj.art-41d2fd58086044da97381f201ae2bac02024-01-03T21:16:22ZengiVolga PressRussian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences2226-11842023-12-011441212512810.18551/rjoas.2023-12.15RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL PROOF OF THE CRIME HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIASari A.G.0Warka M.1Budiarsih2Hadi S.3Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 SurabayaUniversitas 17 Agustus 1945 SurabayaUniversitas 17 Agustus 1945 SurabayaUniversitas 17 Agustus 1945 SurabayaIndonesia is a country that operates a democratic system. A democratic government system is characterized by freedom of each individual to express his opinion in any way that is protected by the state constitution. The rules discussing freedom of opinion are in Article 1 paragraph (1) in Law Number 9 of 1998 concerning Freedom to Express Opinions in Public. In the provisions of this law, every citizen has the right to voice their ideas orally, in writing and through other means without any obstacles, while still carrying out their responsibilities in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations. This law acts as an implementation in Article 28 of 1945 Constitution Republic Indonesia which states: "Freedom of association and assembly, expressing thoughts verbally and in writing and so on is determined by law. The legal provisions governing legally proven crimes of hate speech involve several articles in statutory regulations. These articles include Article 156, Article 157, Article 310, and Article 311 of the Criminal Code, Article 28 paragraph (2) juncto. Article 45A paragraph (2) in Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, and Article 16 in Law Number 40 of 2008 concerning the Elimination of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination. The legal principle used is lex specialis derogat legi generali which will accommodate accountability for every violation of hate speech on social media, with reference to Article 28 paragraph (2) juncto. Article 45A paragraph (2) of the ITE Law stipulates that the length of imprisonment is 6 years and/or a maximum fine of one billion Rupiah.http://rjoas.com/issue-2023-12/article_15.pdflegal proofhate speechsocial media
spellingShingle Sari A.G.
Warka M.
Budiarsih
Hadi S.
RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL PROOF OF THE CRIME HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences
legal proof
hate speech
social media
title RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL PROOF OF THE CRIME HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA
title_full RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL PROOF OF THE CRIME HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA
title_fullStr RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL PROOF OF THE CRIME HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA
title_full_unstemmed RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL PROOF OF THE CRIME HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA
title_short RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL PROOF OF THE CRIME HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA
title_sort responsibility and legal proof of the crime hate speech on social media
topic legal proof
hate speech
social media
url http://rjoas.com/issue-2023-12/article_15.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sariag responsibilityandlegalproofofthecrimehatespeechonsocialmedia
AT warkam responsibilityandlegalproofofthecrimehatespeechonsocialmedia
AT budiarsih responsibilityandlegalproofofthecrimehatespeechonsocialmedia
AT hadis responsibilityandlegalproofofthecrimehatespeechonsocialmedia