Homonymy and the Cognitive Operator of Norm in German
The works of many linguists view homonymy as a negative phenomenon, which interferes with communication, complicates the perception of information, and decreases the effectiveness of the language as a means of communication. At the same time homonymy is a positive phenomenon which contributes to the...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | East European Journal of Psycholinguistics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eejpl.eenu.edu.ua/index.php/eejpl/article/view/286/232 |
| _version_ | 1797727192244813824 |
|---|---|
| author | Svitlana Kiyko Yuriy Kiyko |
| author_facet | Svitlana Kiyko Yuriy Kiyko |
| author_sort | Svitlana Kiyko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The works of many linguists view homonymy as a negative phenomenon, which interferes with communication, complicates the perception of information, and decreases the effectiveness of the language as a means of communication. At the same time homonymy is a positive phenomenon which contributes to the compactness of the language, and allows to economize the units of the plain of content. The objective of our research is to determine the factors that differentiate the meaning of homonymic units, based on the broad factual material and psycholinguistic experiments. The components of intralinguistic homonymic rows based on the category of markedness, which correlates with the cognitive operator of norm / deviation. Among the criteria of markedness for homonymic differentiation are areal, social, chronological, and stylistic. The fact that one of the elements of the homonymic row is unmarked was proved by a number of psycholinguistic experiments, where we offered the German speakers to suggest the first association word which occurred to them referring the homonyms in the list. The experiment was carried out in a group of students from the Institute of German Studies, Technical University Chemnitz (Germany), aged 21-25, whose native language is German. The psycholinguistic analysis shows that 97 per cent of homonymic pairs have both marked and unmarked components. This allows to explain homonymy from the point of view of the correlation of “markedness/unmarkedness”, and wider – “norm/deviation”. From the cognitive point of view language markedness is derived from cognitive markedness, i.e. the unmarked language meaning corresponds to the cognitively normal (natural, expected) state of things, and the marked language meaning corresponds to cognitive deviation, i.e. unnatural, unexpected state of things. Normal state of things belongs to the cognitive image of human experience, and is conceptualized with the minimal mental calculating effort, i.e. is activated automatically; and deviations from this image require additional calculating resources for their activation. Thus, language markedness reflects cognitive operators of norm/deviation in the specific language means in language structures, including homonymic pairs and homonymic rows. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:56:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-41dbc461ae9b4ba38ccd3a002f1efe5b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2312-3265 2313-2116 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:56:19Z |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | East European Journal of Psycholinguistics |
| spelling | doaj.art-41dbc461ae9b4ba38ccd3a002f1efe5b2023-09-02T06:14:12ZengLesya Ukrainka Volyn National UniversityEast European Journal of Psycholinguistics2312-32652313-21162020-06-0171668410.29038/eejpl.2020.7.1.kiyHomonymy and the Cognitive Operator of Norm in GermanSvitlana Kiyko 0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-7043Yuriy Kiyko 1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2251-2811Yuriy Fedkovych National University of Chernivtsi, UkraineSvitlana Kiyko Yuriy Fedkovych National University of Chernivtsi, UkraineThe works of many linguists view homonymy as a negative phenomenon, which interferes with communication, complicates the perception of information, and decreases the effectiveness of the language as a means of communication. At the same time homonymy is a positive phenomenon which contributes to the compactness of the language, and allows to economize the units of the plain of content. The objective of our research is to determine the factors that differentiate the meaning of homonymic units, based on the broad factual material and psycholinguistic experiments. The components of intralinguistic homonymic rows based on the category of markedness, which correlates with the cognitive operator of norm / deviation. Among the criteria of markedness for homonymic differentiation are areal, social, chronological, and stylistic. The fact that one of the elements of the homonymic row is unmarked was proved by a number of psycholinguistic experiments, where we offered the German speakers to suggest the first association word which occurred to them referring the homonyms in the list. The experiment was carried out in a group of students from the Institute of German Studies, Technical University Chemnitz (Germany), aged 21-25, whose native language is German. The psycholinguistic analysis shows that 97 per cent of homonymic pairs have both marked and unmarked components. This allows to explain homonymy from the point of view of the correlation of “markedness/unmarkedness”, and wider – “norm/deviation”. From the cognitive point of view language markedness is derived from cognitive markedness, i.e. the unmarked language meaning corresponds to the cognitively normal (natural, expected) state of things, and the marked language meaning corresponds to cognitive deviation, i.e. unnatural, unexpected state of things. Normal state of things belongs to the cognitive image of human experience, and is conceptualized with the minimal mental calculating effort, i.e. is activated automatically; and deviations from this image require additional calculating resources for their activation. Thus, language markedness reflects cognitive operators of norm/deviation in the specific language means in language structures, including homonymic pairs and homonymic rows.http://eejpl.eenu.edu.ua/index.php/eejpl/article/view/286/232homonymshomonymic rowmarkednesscognitive operator of normgerman language |
| spellingShingle | Svitlana Kiyko Yuriy Kiyko Homonymy and the Cognitive Operator of Norm in German East European Journal of Psycholinguistics homonyms homonymic row markedness cognitive operator of norm german language |
| title | Homonymy and the Cognitive Operator of Norm in German |
| title_full | Homonymy and the Cognitive Operator of Norm in German |
| title_fullStr | Homonymy and the Cognitive Operator of Norm in German |
| title_full_unstemmed | Homonymy and the Cognitive Operator of Norm in German |
| title_short | Homonymy and the Cognitive Operator of Norm in German |
| title_sort | homonymy and the cognitive operator of norm in german |
| topic | homonyms homonymic row markedness cognitive operator of norm german language |
| url | http://eejpl.eenu.edu.ua/index.php/eejpl/article/view/286/232 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT svitlanakiyko homonymyandthecognitiveoperatorofnormingerman AT yuriykiyko homonymyandthecognitiveoperatorofnormingerman |