Estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of establishing additional endovascular Thrombectomy stroke Centres in England: a discrete event simulation

Abstract Background We have previously modelled that the optimal number of comprehensive stroke centres (CSC) providing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in England would be 30 (net 6 new centres). We now estimate the relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of increasing the number of centres fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter McMeekin, Darren Flynn, Mike Allen, Diarmuid Coughlan, Gary A. Ford, Hannah Lumley, Joyce S. Balami, Martin A. James, Ken Stein, David Burgess, Phil White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4678-9
_version_ 1818210802149097472
author Peter McMeekin
Darren Flynn
Mike Allen
Diarmuid Coughlan
Gary A. Ford
Hannah Lumley
Joyce S. Balami
Martin A. James
Ken Stein
David Burgess
Phil White
author_facet Peter McMeekin
Darren Flynn
Mike Allen
Diarmuid Coughlan
Gary A. Ford
Hannah Lumley
Joyce S. Balami
Martin A. James
Ken Stein
David Burgess
Phil White
author_sort Peter McMeekin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background We have previously modelled that the optimal number of comprehensive stroke centres (CSC) providing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in England would be 30 (net 6 new centres). We now estimate the relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of increasing the number of centres from 24 to 30. Methods We constructed a discrete event simulation (DES) to estimate the effectiveness and lifetime cost-effectiveness (from a payer perspective) using 1 year’s incidence of stroke in England. 2000 iterations of the simulation were performed comparing baseline 24 centres to 30. Results Of 80,800 patients admitted to hospital with acute stroke/year, 21,740 would be affected by the service reconfiguration. The median time to treatment for eligible early presenters (< 270 min since onset) would reduce from 195 (IQR 155–249) to 165 (IQR 105–224) minutes. Our model predicts reconfiguration would mean an additional 33 independent patients (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0–1) and 30 fewer dependent/dead patients (mRS 3–6) per year. The net addition of 6 centres generates 190 QALYs (95%CI − 6 to 399) and results in net savings to the healthcare system of £1,864,000/year (95% CI -1,204,000 to £5,017,000). The estimated budget impact was a saving of £980,000 in year 1 and £7.07 million in years 2 to 5. Conclusion Changes in acute stroke service configuration will produce clinical and cost benefits when the time taken for patients to receive treatment is reduced. Benefits are highly likely to be cost saving over 5 years before any capital investment above £8 million is required.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:22:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41df196429154360abb4bf6c12322eea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:22:23Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-41df196429154360abb4bf6c12322eea2022-12-22T00:36:35ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632019-11-0119111110.1186/s12913-019-4678-9Estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of establishing additional endovascular Thrombectomy stroke Centres in England: a discrete event simulationPeter McMeekin0Darren Flynn1Mike Allen2Diarmuid Coughlan3Gary A. Ford4Hannah Lumley5Joyce S. Balami6Martin A. James7Ken Stein8David Burgess9Phil White10School of Health, Community and Education Studies, Northumbria UniversitySchool of Health and Social Care, Teesside UniversityNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South West PeninsulaInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle UniversityOxford University Hospitals NHS TrustInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle UniversityOxford UniversityNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South West PeninsulaNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South West PeninsulaClinical Research Network North East and North Cumbria, North East and North Cumbria Stroke Patient & Carer PanelInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle UniversityAbstract Background We have previously modelled that the optimal number of comprehensive stroke centres (CSC) providing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in England would be 30 (net 6 new centres). We now estimate the relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of increasing the number of centres from 24 to 30. Methods We constructed a discrete event simulation (DES) to estimate the effectiveness and lifetime cost-effectiveness (from a payer perspective) using 1 year’s incidence of stroke in England. 2000 iterations of the simulation were performed comparing baseline 24 centres to 30. Results Of 80,800 patients admitted to hospital with acute stroke/year, 21,740 would be affected by the service reconfiguration. The median time to treatment for eligible early presenters (< 270 min since onset) would reduce from 195 (IQR 155–249) to 165 (IQR 105–224) minutes. Our model predicts reconfiguration would mean an additional 33 independent patients (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0–1) and 30 fewer dependent/dead patients (mRS 3–6) per year. The net addition of 6 centres generates 190 QALYs (95%CI − 6 to 399) and results in net savings to the healthcare system of £1,864,000/year (95% CI -1,204,000 to £5,017,000). The estimated budget impact was a saving of £980,000 in year 1 and £7.07 million in years 2 to 5. Conclusion Changes in acute stroke service configuration will produce clinical and cost benefits when the time taken for patients to receive treatment is reduced. Benefits are highly likely to be cost saving over 5 years before any capital investment above £8 million is required.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4678-9ThrombectomyAcute strokePredictive modelsHealth economics
spellingShingle Peter McMeekin
Darren Flynn
Mike Allen
Diarmuid Coughlan
Gary A. Ford
Hannah Lumley
Joyce S. Balami
Martin A. James
Ken Stein
David Burgess
Phil White
Estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of establishing additional endovascular Thrombectomy stroke Centres in England: a discrete event simulation
BMC Health Services Research
Thrombectomy
Acute stroke
Predictive models
Health economics
title Estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of establishing additional endovascular Thrombectomy stroke Centres in England: a discrete event simulation
title_full Estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of establishing additional endovascular Thrombectomy stroke Centres in England: a discrete event simulation
title_fullStr Estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of establishing additional endovascular Thrombectomy stroke Centres in England: a discrete event simulation
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of establishing additional endovascular Thrombectomy stroke Centres in England: a discrete event simulation
title_short Estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of establishing additional endovascular Thrombectomy stroke Centres in England: a discrete event simulation
title_sort estimating the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of establishing additional endovascular thrombectomy stroke centres in england a discrete event simulation
topic Thrombectomy
Acute stroke
Predictive models
Health economics
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4678-9
work_keys_str_mv AT petermcmeekin estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT darrenflynn estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT mikeallen estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT diarmuidcoughlan estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT garyaford estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT hannahlumley estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT joycesbalami estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT martinajames estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT kenstein estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT davidburgess estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation
AT philwhite estimatingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofestablishingadditionalendovascularthrombectomystrokecentresinenglandadiscreteeventsimulation