The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews

Abstract Background Policymakers in many countries promote collaboration between health care organizations and other sectors as a route to improving population health. Local collaborations have been developed for decades. Yet little is known about the impact of cross-sector collaboration on health a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugh Alderwick, Andrew Hutchings, Adam Briggs, Nicholas Mays
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-04-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1
_version_ 1819291239190626304
author Hugh Alderwick
Andrew Hutchings
Adam Briggs
Nicholas Mays
author_facet Hugh Alderwick
Andrew Hutchings
Adam Briggs
Nicholas Mays
author_sort Hugh Alderwick
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Policymakers in many countries promote collaboration between health care organizations and other sectors as a route to improving population health. Local collaborations have been developed for decades. Yet little is known about the impact of cross-sector collaboration on health and health equity. Methods We carried out a systematic review of reviews to synthesize evidence on the health impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations, and to understand the factors affecting how these partnerships functioned. We searched four databases and included 36 studies (reviews) in our review. We extracted data from these studies and used Nvivo 12 to help categorize the data. We assessed risk of bias in the studies using standardized tools. We used a narrative approach to synthesizing and reporting the data. Results The 36 studies we reviewed included evidence on varying forms of collaboration in diverse contexts. Some studies included data on collaborations with broad population health goals, such as preventing disease and reducing health inequalities. Others focused on collaborations with a narrower focus, such as better integration between health care and social services. Overall, there is little convincing evidence to suggest that collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations improves health outcomes. Evidence of impact on health services is mixed. And evidence of impact on resource use and spending are limited and mixed. Despite this, many studies report on factors associated with better or worse collaboration. We grouped these into five domains: motivation and purpose, relationships and cultures, resources and capabilities, governance and leadership, and external factors. But data linking factors in these domains to collaboration outcomes is sparse. Conclusions In theory, collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations might contribute to better population health. But we know little about which kinds of collaborations work, for whom, and in what contexts. The benefits of collaboration may be hard to deliver, hard to measure, and overestimated by policymakers. Ultimately, local collaborations should be understood within their macro-level political and economic context, and as one component within a wider system of factors and interventions interacting to shape population health.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T03:35:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41f1f200b845475685776afec1dff7b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T03:35:28Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-41f1f200b845475685776afec1dff7b62022-12-21T17:17:05ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-04-0121111610.1186/s12889-021-10630-1The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviewsHugh Alderwick0Andrew Hutchings1Adam Briggs2Nicholas Mays3Health Foundation, 8 Salisbury SquareLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineHealth Foundation, 8 Salisbury SquareLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineAbstract Background Policymakers in many countries promote collaboration between health care organizations and other sectors as a route to improving population health. Local collaborations have been developed for decades. Yet little is known about the impact of cross-sector collaboration on health and health equity. Methods We carried out a systematic review of reviews to synthesize evidence on the health impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations, and to understand the factors affecting how these partnerships functioned. We searched four databases and included 36 studies (reviews) in our review. We extracted data from these studies and used Nvivo 12 to help categorize the data. We assessed risk of bias in the studies using standardized tools. We used a narrative approach to synthesizing and reporting the data. Results The 36 studies we reviewed included evidence on varying forms of collaboration in diverse contexts. Some studies included data on collaborations with broad population health goals, such as preventing disease and reducing health inequalities. Others focused on collaborations with a narrower focus, such as better integration between health care and social services. Overall, there is little convincing evidence to suggest that collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations improves health outcomes. Evidence of impact on health services is mixed. And evidence of impact on resource use and spending are limited and mixed. Despite this, many studies report on factors associated with better or worse collaboration. We grouped these into five domains: motivation and purpose, relationships and cultures, resources and capabilities, governance and leadership, and external factors. But data linking factors in these domains to collaboration outcomes is sparse. Conclusions In theory, collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations might contribute to better population health. But we know little about which kinds of collaborations work, for whom, and in what contexts. The benefits of collaboration may be hard to deliver, hard to measure, and overestimated by policymakers. Ultimately, local collaborations should be understood within their macro-level political and economic context, and as one component within a wider system of factors and interventions interacting to shape population health.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1Inter-organizational collaborationMultisector partnershipsSystematic reviewHealth policy
spellingShingle Hugh Alderwick
Andrew Hutchings
Adam Briggs
Nicholas Mays
The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews
BMC Public Health
Inter-organizational collaboration
Multisector partnerships
Systematic review
Health policy
title The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews
title_full The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews
title_fullStr The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews
title_full_unstemmed The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews
title_short The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews
title_sort impacts of collaboration between local health care and non health care organizations and factors shaping how they work a systematic review of reviews
topic Inter-organizational collaboration
Multisector partnerships
Systematic review
Health policy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hughalderwick theimpactsofcollaborationbetweenlocalhealthcareandnonhealthcareorganizationsandfactorsshapinghowtheyworkasystematicreviewofreviews
AT andrewhutchings theimpactsofcollaborationbetweenlocalhealthcareandnonhealthcareorganizationsandfactorsshapinghowtheyworkasystematicreviewofreviews
AT adambriggs theimpactsofcollaborationbetweenlocalhealthcareandnonhealthcareorganizationsandfactorsshapinghowtheyworkasystematicreviewofreviews
AT nicholasmays theimpactsofcollaborationbetweenlocalhealthcareandnonhealthcareorganizationsandfactorsshapinghowtheyworkasystematicreviewofreviews
AT hughalderwick impactsofcollaborationbetweenlocalhealthcareandnonhealthcareorganizationsandfactorsshapinghowtheyworkasystematicreviewofreviews
AT andrewhutchings impactsofcollaborationbetweenlocalhealthcareandnonhealthcareorganizationsandfactorsshapinghowtheyworkasystematicreviewofreviews
AT adambriggs impactsofcollaborationbetweenlocalhealthcareandnonhealthcareorganizationsandfactorsshapinghowtheyworkasystematicreviewofreviews
AT nicholasmays impactsofcollaborationbetweenlocalhealthcareandnonhealthcareorganizationsandfactorsshapinghowtheyworkasystematicreviewofreviews