Impact of Partial Replacement of Wheat Flour with Chickpea Flour on Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Tea Buns

ABSTRACTThe present study aimed to identify the optimum substitution ratio of chickpea flour (CF) into ordinary tea buns with intention to improve the nutritional value and the best sensory properties while retaining their shape. Flour blends were prepared in the proportions of wheat flour WF: CF (w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A.G.S.K. Pushpakumara, N. Gunasesakara, H. M.T. Herath, T. Madhujith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-09-01
Series:International Journal of Food Properties
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10942912.2023.2223778
_version_ 1797202451654246400
author A.G.S.K. Pushpakumara
N. Gunasesakara
H. M.T. Herath
T. Madhujith
author_facet A.G.S.K. Pushpakumara
N. Gunasesakara
H. M.T. Herath
T. Madhujith
author_sort A.G.S.K. Pushpakumara
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTThe present study aimed to identify the optimum substitution ratio of chickpea flour (CF) into ordinary tea buns with intention to improve the nutritional value and the best sensory properties while retaining their shape. Flour blends were prepared in the proportions of wheat flour WF: CF (w/w %) 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, and 50:50 while WF (100:0) as a control. The rheological properties of blends were determined by Brabender farinograph apparatus. The prepared buns were evaluated for color, loaf specific volume, proximate composition, amino acid profile, and the preference towards sensory properties. According to the farinograph results, WF and 20% substitution were strong dough while 30%, 40%, and 50% substitutions were medium-strength doughs. In higher incorporation ratios, the moisture contents of the buns were decreased and the crumb texture gets harder and less porous making the product unacceptable. Buns made with 40% and 50% substitution failed to exceed the minimum requirement of specific loaf volume. The levels of protein in the buns are gradually elevated, making the product more nutritious with complementing amino acid profiles. Although the higher incorporation is more healthy and nutritious, only 20% and 30% CF incorporated buns seem to be practical in the manufacturing industry.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:19:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41fa19092ad24c449c4a93f425ae835d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1094-2912
1532-2386
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:03:39Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Food Properties
spelling doaj.art-41fa19092ad24c449c4a93f425ae835d2024-04-17T13:20:14ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Food Properties1094-29121532-23862023-09-012611522153310.1080/10942912.2023.2223778Impact of Partial Replacement of Wheat Flour with Chickpea Flour on Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Tea BunsA.G.S.K. Pushpakumara0N. Gunasesakara1H. M.T. Herath2T. Madhujith3Food Technology Section, Modern Research and Development Complex, Industrial Technology Institute, Colombo, Sri LankaFood Technology Section, Modern Research and Development Complex, Industrial Technology Institute, Colombo, Sri LankaFood Technology Section, Modern Research and Development Complex, Industrial Technology Institute, Colombo, Sri LankaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri LankaABSTRACTThe present study aimed to identify the optimum substitution ratio of chickpea flour (CF) into ordinary tea buns with intention to improve the nutritional value and the best sensory properties while retaining their shape. Flour blends were prepared in the proportions of wheat flour WF: CF (w/w %) 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, and 50:50 while WF (100:0) as a control. The rheological properties of blends were determined by Brabender farinograph apparatus. The prepared buns were evaluated for color, loaf specific volume, proximate composition, amino acid profile, and the preference towards sensory properties. According to the farinograph results, WF and 20% substitution were strong dough while 30%, 40%, and 50% substitutions were medium-strength doughs. In higher incorporation ratios, the moisture contents of the buns were decreased and the crumb texture gets harder and less porous making the product unacceptable. Buns made with 40% and 50% substitution failed to exceed the minimum requirement of specific loaf volume. The levels of protein in the buns are gradually elevated, making the product more nutritious with complementing amino acid profiles. Although the higher incorporation is more healthy and nutritious, only 20% and 30% CF incorporated buns seem to be practical in the manufacturing industry.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10942912.2023.2223778ChickpeaTea bunsFlour blendsDough developmentSpecific volume
spellingShingle A.G.S.K. Pushpakumara
N. Gunasesakara
H. M.T. Herath
T. Madhujith
Impact of Partial Replacement of Wheat Flour with Chickpea Flour on Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Tea Buns
International Journal of Food Properties
Chickpea
Tea buns
Flour blends
Dough development
Specific volume
title Impact of Partial Replacement of Wheat Flour with Chickpea Flour on Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Tea Buns
title_full Impact of Partial Replacement of Wheat Flour with Chickpea Flour on Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Tea Buns
title_fullStr Impact of Partial Replacement of Wheat Flour with Chickpea Flour on Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Tea Buns
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Partial Replacement of Wheat Flour with Chickpea Flour on Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Tea Buns
title_short Impact of Partial Replacement of Wheat Flour with Chickpea Flour on Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Tea Buns
title_sort impact of partial replacement of wheat flour with chickpea flour on physico chemical and sensory properties of tea buns
topic Chickpea
Tea buns
Flour blends
Dough development
Specific volume
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10942912.2023.2223778
work_keys_str_mv AT agskpushpakumara impactofpartialreplacementofwheatflourwithchickpeaflouronphysicochemicalandsensorypropertiesofteabuns
AT ngunasesakara impactofpartialreplacementofwheatflourwithchickpeaflouronphysicochemicalandsensorypropertiesofteabuns
AT hmtherath impactofpartialreplacementofwheatflourwithchickpeaflouronphysicochemicalandsensorypropertiesofteabuns
AT tmadhujith impactofpartialreplacementofwheatflourwithchickpeaflouronphysicochemicalandsensorypropertiesofteabuns