Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis

Modernisation of municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) should be carried out, taking into account its impact on global warming, e.g., through carbon footprint (CF) analysis. An important industrial sector in Poland is the dairy industry. In dairy WWTPs, the aerobic sewage slud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beata Karolinczak, Wojciech Dąbrowski, Radosław Żyłka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5366
_version_ 1797521434517438464
author Beata Karolinczak
Wojciech Dąbrowski
Radosław Żyłka
author_facet Beata Karolinczak
Wojciech Dąbrowski
Radosław Żyłka
author_sort Beata Karolinczak
collection DOAJ
description Modernisation of municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) should be carried out, taking into account its impact on global warming, e.g., through carbon footprint (CF) analysis. An important industrial sector in Poland is the dairy industry. In dairy WWTPs, the aerobic sewage sludge stabilisation applied thus far is being replaced by the anaerobic process. This change is positive due to the possibility of energy production, but it is unclear how it affects greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. The aim of the research was to perform CF analysis for two scenarios of dairy WWTP operation. The analysis was based on the real operating data of the current system (current scenario) and project of its modernisation (alternative scenario). The current scenario consists of mechanical and dissolved air flotation (DAF) treatment, biological treatment in sequence batch reactors (SBRs), aerobic sewage sludge stabilisation and its final farmland usage. The alternative scenario assumes replacing aerobic stabilisation with anaerobic stabilisation and a combined heat and power (CHP) system. The CF calculations were based on empirical models, taking into account different emission input parameters, expressed in CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (CO<sub>2e</sub>). The total CF of the current scenario was 22 kg CO<sub>2e</sub> PE<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, while the alternative was 45 kg CO<sub>2e</sub> PE<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>. The largest share in the current scenario belongs to emissions from WWTPs and energy use, while in the alternative, there is the addition of emissions from biogas use.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:12:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-41fc8bb5896b4502857ad0e6aeb2936f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:12:32Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-41fc8bb5896b4502857ad0e6aeb2936f2023-11-22T10:33:35ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-08-011417536610.3390/en14175366Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint AnalysisBeata Karolinczak0Wojciech Dąbrowski1Radosław Żyłka2Faculty of Building Services Hydro and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 20 Nowowiejska St., 00-653 Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, Bialystok University of Technology, 45E Wiejska St., 15-351 Bialystok, PolandBielmlek Dairy Cooperative, Wojska Polskiego 52, 17-100 Bielsk Podlaski, PolandModernisation of municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) should be carried out, taking into account its impact on global warming, e.g., through carbon footprint (CF) analysis. An important industrial sector in Poland is the dairy industry. In dairy WWTPs, the aerobic sewage sludge stabilisation applied thus far is being replaced by the anaerobic process. This change is positive due to the possibility of energy production, but it is unclear how it affects greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. The aim of the research was to perform CF analysis for two scenarios of dairy WWTP operation. The analysis was based on the real operating data of the current system (current scenario) and project of its modernisation (alternative scenario). The current scenario consists of mechanical and dissolved air flotation (DAF) treatment, biological treatment in sequence batch reactors (SBRs), aerobic sewage sludge stabilisation and its final farmland usage. The alternative scenario assumes replacing aerobic stabilisation with anaerobic stabilisation and a combined heat and power (CHP) system. The CF calculations were based on empirical models, taking into account different emission input parameters, expressed in CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (CO<sub>2e</sub>). The total CF of the current scenario was 22 kg CO<sub>2e</sub> PE<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, while the alternative was 45 kg CO<sub>2e</sub> PE<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>. The largest share in the current scenario belongs to emissions from WWTPs and energy use, while in the alternative, there is the addition of emissions from biogas use.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5366dairy WWTPactivated sludgesewage sludge managementanaerobic and aerobic stabilisationcarbon footprintgreenhouse gases emissions
spellingShingle Beata Karolinczak
Wojciech Dąbrowski
Radosław Żyłka
Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis
Energies
dairy WWTP
activated sludge
sewage sludge management
anaerobic and aerobic stabilisation
carbon footprint
greenhouse gases emissions
title Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis
title_full Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis
title_short Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis
title_sort evaluation of dairy wastewater treatment systems using carbon footprint analysis
topic dairy WWTP
activated sludge
sewage sludge management
anaerobic and aerobic stabilisation
carbon footprint
greenhouse gases emissions
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5366
work_keys_str_mv AT beatakarolinczak evaluationofdairywastewatertreatmentsystemsusingcarbonfootprintanalysis
AT wojciechdabrowski evaluationofdairywastewatertreatmentsystemsusingcarbonfootprintanalysis
AT radosławzyłka evaluationofdairywastewatertreatmentsystemsusingcarbonfootprintanalysis