Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital

Objective: To contribute our five years of experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital and find out the risk factors of prolonged length of hospital stay. Material and Methods: A review of the hospital database of all the patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S Ruangsin, T Wanasuwannakul, S Sangkhathat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Prince of Songkla University 2007-08-01
Series:Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/646
_version_ 1818131211623596032
author S Ruangsin
T Wanasuwannakul
S Sangkhathat
author_facet S Ruangsin
T Wanasuwannakul
S Sangkhathat
author_sort S Ruangsin
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To contribute our five years of experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital and find out the risk factors of prolonged length of hospital stay. Material and Methods: A review of the hospital database of all the patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2001 and December 2005. Results: A total of 539 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed; the conversion rate was 23.19%. In the cases of successful laparoscopic surgery; patients the mean time for hospital stay was 5.23 days. Surgical site infection occurred in 9.67% of the cases and prophylactic antibiotics were used for 85.27% of the patients. Significantly, surgical wound infection was associated with the type of drain used and also obesity (p = 0.03, p < 0.001). Local injections of marcaine did not reduce the volume/quantity of narcotic used (p=0.236), and was found to very slightly increase the incidence of wound infection (p = 0.215). Prophylactic postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) did not reduce the incidence of severe PONV and medication used (p = 0.109). One patient had a common bile duct injury (0.28%). Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible procedure. We have tried to improve the patient outcome through moving to a day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical option.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T08:17:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-42082433326645289771469c66f5f31a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2586-9981
2630-0559
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T08:17:20Z
publishDate 2007-08-01
publisher Prince of Songkla University
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
spelling doaj.art-42082433326645289771469c66f5f31a2022-12-22T01:14:44ZengPrince of Songkla UniversityJournal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)2586-99812630-05592007-08-01254315321660Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind HospitalS Ruangsin0T Wanasuwannakul1S Sangkhathat2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Objective: To contribute our five years of experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital and find out the risk factors of prolonged length of hospital stay. Material and Methods: A review of the hospital database of all the patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2001 and December 2005. Results: A total of 539 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed; the conversion rate was 23.19%. In the cases of successful laparoscopic surgery; patients the mean time for hospital stay was 5.23 days. Surgical site infection occurred in 9.67% of the cases and prophylactic antibiotics were used for 85.27% of the patients. Significantly, surgical wound infection was associated with the type of drain used and also obesity (p = 0.03, p < 0.001). Local injections of marcaine did not reduce the volume/quantity of narcotic used (p=0.236), and was found to very slightly increase the incidence of wound infection (p = 0.215). Prophylactic postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) did not reduce the incidence of severe PONV and medication used (p = 0.109). One patient had a common bile duct injury (0.28%). Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible procedure. We have tried to improve the patient outcome through moving to a day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical option.https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/646laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gall stone
spellingShingle S Ruangsin
T Wanasuwannakul
S Sangkhathat
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital
Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gall stone
title Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_full Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_fullStr Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_short Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_sort laparoscopic cholecystectomy in songklanagarind hospital
topic laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gall stone
url https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/646
work_keys_str_mv AT sruangsin laparoscopiccholecystectomyinsongklanagarindhospital
AT twanasuwannakul laparoscopiccholecystectomyinsongklanagarindhospital
AT ssangkhathat laparoscopiccholecystectomyinsongklanagarindhospital