Morphometric imaging biomarker identifies Alzheimer’s disease even among mixed dementia patients

Abstract A definitive diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), even in the presence of co-morbid neuropathology (occurring in > 50% of AD cases), is a significant unmet medical need that has obstructed the discovery of effective AD therapeutics. An AD-biomarker, the Morphometric Imaging (MI) assay...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florin V. Chirila, Guang Xu, Dan Fontaine, Grant Kern, Tapan K. Khan, Jason Brandt, Yoshihiro Konishi, Gerhard Nebe-von-Caron, Charles L. White, Daniel L. Alkon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-11-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21796-y
_version_ 1797984757459451904
author Florin V. Chirila
Guang Xu
Dan Fontaine
Grant Kern
Tapan K. Khan
Jason Brandt
Yoshihiro Konishi
Gerhard Nebe-von-Caron
Charles L. White
Daniel L. Alkon
author_facet Florin V. Chirila
Guang Xu
Dan Fontaine
Grant Kern
Tapan K. Khan
Jason Brandt
Yoshihiro Konishi
Gerhard Nebe-von-Caron
Charles L. White
Daniel L. Alkon
author_sort Florin V. Chirila
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A definitive diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), even in the presence of co-morbid neuropathology (occurring in > 50% of AD cases), is a significant unmet medical need that has obstructed the discovery of effective AD therapeutics. An AD-biomarker, the Morphometric Imaging (MI) assay on cultured skin fibroblasts, was used in a double-blind, allcomers (ages 55–90) trial of 3 patient cohorts: AD dementia patients, N = 25, all autopsy confirmed, non-AD dementia patients, N = 21—all autopsy or genetically confirmed; and non-demented control (AHC) patients N = 27. Fibroblasts cells isolated from 3-mm skin punch biopsies were cultured on a 3-D Matrigel matrix with movement dynamics quantified by image analysis. From counts of all aggregates (N) in a pre-defined field image and measures of the average area (A) of aggregates per image, the number-to-area ratios in a natural logarithmic form Ln(A/N) were determined for all patient samples. AD cell lines formed fewer large aggregates (cells clustered together) than non-AD or AHC cell lines. The cut-off value of Ln(A/N) = 6.98 was determined from the biomarker values of non-demented apparently healthy control (AHC) cases. Unequivocal validation by autopsy, genetics, and/or dementia criteria was possible for all 73 patient samples. The samples were collected from multiple centers—four US centers and one center in Japan. The study found no effect of center-to-center variation in fibroblast isolation, cell growth, or cell aggregation values (Ln(A/N)). The autopsy-confirmed MI Biomarker distinguished AD from non-AD dementia (non-ADD) patients and correctly diagnosed AD even in the presence of other co-morbid pathologies at autopsy (True Positive = 25, False Negative = 0, False Positive = 0, True Negative = 21, and Accuracy = 100%. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 100% (95% CI = 84 to 100.00%). From these findings, the MI assay appears to detect AD with great accuracy—even with abundant co-morbidity.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:06:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-421842d784514b24b7e8dd3b1b3c8854
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:06:44Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-421842d784514b24b7e8dd3b1b3c88542022-12-22T04:38:22ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-11-0112111410.1038/s41598-022-21796-yMorphometric imaging biomarker identifies Alzheimer’s disease even among mixed dementia patientsFlorin V. Chirila0Guang Xu1Dan Fontaine2Grant Kern3Tapan K. Khan4Jason Brandt5Yoshihiro Konishi6Gerhard Nebe-von-Caron7Charles L. White8Daniel L. Alkon9Synaps DxSynaps DxSynaps DxSynaps DxSynaps DxJohns Hopkins Hospital PsychiatryNational Hospital Organization Tottori Medical Center TottoriMologicDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterSynaps DxAbstract A definitive diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), even in the presence of co-morbid neuropathology (occurring in > 50% of AD cases), is a significant unmet medical need that has obstructed the discovery of effective AD therapeutics. An AD-biomarker, the Morphometric Imaging (MI) assay on cultured skin fibroblasts, was used in a double-blind, allcomers (ages 55–90) trial of 3 patient cohorts: AD dementia patients, N = 25, all autopsy confirmed, non-AD dementia patients, N = 21—all autopsy or genetically confirmed; and non-demented control (AHC) patients N = 27. Fibroblasts cells isolated from 3-mm skin punch biopsies were cultured on a 3-D Matrigel matrix with movement dynamics quantified by image analysis. From counts of all aggregates (N) in a pre-defined field image and measures of the average area (A) of aggregates per image, the number-to-area ratios in a natural logarithmic form Ln(A/N) were determined for all patient samples. AD cell lines formed fewer large aggregates (cells clustered together) than non-AD or AHC cell lines. The cut-off value of Ln(A/N) = 6.98 was determined from the biomarker values of non-demented apparently healthy control (AHC) cases. Unequivocal validation by autopsy, genetics, and/or dementia criteria was possible for all 73 patient samples. The samples were collected from multiple centers—four US centers and one center in Japan. The study found no effect of center-to-center variation in fibroblast isolation, cell growth, or cell aggregation values (Ln(A/N)). The autopsy-confirmed MI Biomarker distinguished AD from non-AD dementia (non-ADD) patients and correctly diagnosed AD even in the presence of other co-morbid pathologies at autopsy (True Positive = 25, False Negative = 0, False Positive = 0, True Negative = 21, and Accuracy = 100%. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 100% (95% CI = 84 to 100.00%). From these findings, the MI assay appears to detect AD with great accuracy—even with abundant co-morbidity.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21796-y
spellingShingle Florin V. Chirila
Guang Xu
Dan Fontaine
Grant Kern
Tapan K. Khan
Jason Brandt
Yoshihiro Konishi
Gerhard Nebe-von-Caron
Charles L. White
Daniel L. Alkon
Morphometric imaging biomarker identifies Alzheimer’s disease even among mixed dementia patients
Scientific Reports
title Morphometric imaging biomarker identifies Alzheimer’s disease even among mixed dementia patients
title_full Morphometric imaging biomarker identifies Alzheimer’s disease even among mixed dementia patients
title_fullStr Morphometric imaging biomarker identifies Alzheimer’s disease even among mixed dementia patients
title_full_unstemmed Morphometric imaging biomarker identifies Alzheimer’s disease even among mixed dementia patients
title_short Morphometric imaging biomarker identifies Alzheimer’s disease even among mixed dementia patients
title_sort morphometric imaging biomarker identifies alzheimer s disease even among mixed dementia patients
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21796-y
work_keys_str_mv AT florinvchirila morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients
AT guangxu morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients
AT danfontaine morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients
AT grantkern morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients
AT tapankkhan morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients
AT jasonbrandt morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients
AT yoshihirokonishi morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients
AT gerhardnebevoncaron morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients
AT charleslwhite morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients
AT daniellalkon morphometricimagingbiomarkeridentifiesalzheimersdiseaseevenamongmixeddementiapatients