Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries

Increasingly, intensive livestock production systems have increased societal concern regarding the current animal welfare standards. We investigated whether individuals in their roles as consumers and citizens believe that the current European regulations regarding animal welfare should be more rest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niloofar Pejman, Zein Kallas, Antoni Dalmau, Antonio Velarde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/4/195
_version_ 1818155718342082560
author Niloofar Pejman
Zein Kallas
Antoni Dalmau
Antonio Velarde
author_facet Niloofar Pejman
Zein Kallas
Antoni Dalmau
Antonio Velarde
author_sort Niloofar Pejman
collection DOAJ
description Increasingly, intensive livestock production systems have increased societal concern regarding the current animal welfare standards. We investigated whether individuals in their roles as consumers and citizens believe that the current European regulations regarding animal welfare should be more restrictive. Factors affecting this decision were assessed by analyzing respondents’ understanding of animal welfare-related issues, their subjective and objective knowledge levels, the credibility they assign to different information sources, their perceptions toward the current restrictiveness of animal welfare standards, and their socioeconomic characteristics. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire distributed in eight European Union (EU) countries (Spain, the United Kingdom, Poland, Greece, Lithuania, Romania, Italy, and Sweden) with 3860 total responses. The results showed that consumers are more reluctant to adopt more restrictive regulations than respondents in the role of citizens. Respondents from northern European countries (Poland and Sweden) are more likely to support regulations that are more restrictive than the current minimum requirements than respondents from southern countries (Spain and Italy). Women were found to be more concerned with the welfare of pigs and laying hens—lending credibility to the Internet as an information source—and were more likely to support more restrictive animal welfare legislation.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T14:46:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-422b4f2e9b574db3ab9b5b93b6dcb4c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T14:46:51Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-422b4f2e9b574db3ab9b5b93b6dcb4c72022-12-22T01:01:39ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152019-04-019419510.3390/ani9040195ani9040195Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union CountriesNiloofar Pejman0Zein Kallas1Antoni Dalmau2Antonio Velarde3Institute for Research in Sustainability Science and Technology (IS-UPC), Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08034 Barcelona, SpainCentre for Agro-food Economy and Development, CREDA-UPC-IRTA, 08860 Castelldefels, SpainInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology—IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, 17121 Monells, SpainInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology—IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, 17121 Monells, SpainIncreasingly, intensive livestock production systems have increased societal concern regarding the current animal welfare standards. We investigated whether individuals in their roles as consumers and citizens believe that the current European regulations regarding animal welfare should be more restrictive. Factors affecting this decision were assessed by analyzing respondents’ understanding of animal welfare-related issues, their subjective and objective knowledge levels, the credibility they assign to different information sources, their perceptions toward the current restrictiveness of animal welfare standards, and their socioeconomic characteristics. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire distributed in eight European Union (EU) countries (Spain, the United Kingdom, Poland, Greece, Lithuania, Romania, Italy, and Sweden) with 3860 total responses. The results showed that consumers are more reluctant to adopt more restrictive regulations than respondents in the role of citizens. Respondents from northern European countries (Poland and Sweden) are more likely to support regulations that are more restrictive than the current minimum requirements than respondents from southern countries (Spain and Italy). Women were found to be more concerned with the welfare of pigs and laying hens—lending credibility to the Internet as an information source—and were more likely to support more restrictive animal welfare legislation.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/4/195animal welfarecitizensconsumersEU
spellingShingle Niloofar Pejman
Zein Kallas
Antoni Dalmau
Antonio Velarde
Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries
Animals
animal welfare
citizens
consumers
EU
title Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries
title_full Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries
title_fullStr Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries
title_full_unstemmed Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries
title_short Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries
title_sort should animal welfare regulations be more restrictive a case study in eight european union countries
topic animal welfare
citizens
consumers
EU
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/4/195
work_keys_str_mv AT niloofarpejman shouldanimalwelfareregulationsbemorerestrictiveacasestudyineighteuropeanunioncountries
AT zeinkallas shouldanimalwelfareregulationsbemorerestrictiveacasestudyineighteuropeanunioncountries
AT antonidalmau shouldanimalwelfareregulationsbemorerestrictiveacasestudyineighteuropeanunioncountries
AT antoniovelarde shouldanimalwelfareregulationsbemorerestrictiveacasestudyineighteuropeanunioncountries