Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably

An ongoing conservation question is if we can maintain functional diversity by optimizing for preservation of phylogenetic diversity. Here, Mazel et al. show that functional diversity increases with phylogenetic diversity in some clades but not others, and thus could be a risky conservation strategy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florent Mazel, Matthew W. Pennell, Marc W. Cadotte, Sandra Diaz, Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva, Richard Grenyer, Fabien Leprieur, Arne O. Mooers, David Mouillot, Caroline M. Tucker, William D. Pearse
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2018-07-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05126-3
_version_ 1819129335645208576
author Florent Mazel
Matthew W. Pennell
Marc W. Cadotte
Sandra Diaz
Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva
Richard Grenyer
Fabien Leprieur
Arne O. Mooers
David Mouillot
Caroline M. Tucker
William D. Pearse
author_facet Florent Mazel
Matthew W. Pennell
Marc W. Cadotte
Sandra Diaz
Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva
Richard Grenyer
Fabien Leprieur
Arne O. Mooers
David Mouillot
Caroline M. Tucker
William D. Pearse
author_sort Florent Mazel
collection DOAJ
description An ongoing conservation question is if we can maintain functional diversity by optimizing for preservation of phylogenetic diversity. Here, Mazel et al. show that functional diversity increases with phylogenetic diversity in some clades but not others, and thus could be a risky conservation strategy.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T08:42:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4233961532554277bb7fd039983d4eb2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-1723
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T08:42:05Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj.art-4233961532554277bb7fd039983d4eb22022-12-21T18:32:13ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232018-07-01911910.1038/s41467-018-05126-3Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliablyFlorent Mazel0Matthew W. Pennell1Marc W. Cadotte2Sandra Diaz3Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva4Richard Grenyer5Fabien Leprieur6Arne O. Mooers7David Mouillot8Caroline M. Tucker9William D. Pearse10Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser UniversityBiodiversity Research Centre, University of British ColumbiaBiological Sciences, University of Toronto-ScarboroughInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, CONICET and FECFyN - Universidad Nacional de CórdobaDepartment of Statistics, University of British ColumbiaSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of OxfordMarine Biodiversity, Exploitation, and Conservation (MARBEC), UMR 9190, Université de MontpellierDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser UniversityMarine Biodiversity, Exploitation, and Conservation (MARBEC), UMR 9190, Université de MontpellierDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina-Chapel HillEcology Center and Department of Biology, Utah State UniversityAn ongoing conservation question is if we can maintain functional diversity by optimizing for preservation of phylogenetic diversity. Here, Mazel et al. show that functional diversity increases with phylogenetic diversity in some clades but not others, and thus could be a risky conservation strategy.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05126-3
spellingShingle Florent Mazel
Matthew W. Pennell
Marc W. Cadotte
Sandra Diaz
Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva
Richard Grenyer
Fabien Leprieur
Arne O. Mooers
David Mouillot
Caroline M. Tucker
William D. Pearse
Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
Nature Communications
title Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
title_full Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
title_fullStr Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
title_short Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
title_sort prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05126-3
work_keys_str_mv AT florentmazel prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT matthewwpennell prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT marcwcadotte prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT sandradiaz prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT giuliovalentinodallariva prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT richardgrenyer prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT fabienleprieur prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT arneomooers prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT davidmouillot prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT carolinemtucker prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably
AT williamdpearse prioritizingphylogeneticdiversitycapturesfunctionaldiversityunreliably