Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
An ongoing conservation question is if we can maintain functional diversity by optimizing for preservation of phylogenetic diversity. Here, Mazel et al. show that functional diversity increases with phylogenetic diversity in some clades but not others, and thus could be a risky conservation strategy...
Main Authors: | Florent Mazel, Matthew W. Pennell, Marc W. Cadotte, Sandra Diaz, Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva, Richard Grenyer, Fabien Leprieur, Arne O. Mooers, David Mouillot, Caroline M. Tucker, William D. Pearse |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05126-3 |
Similar Items
-
Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
by: Mazel, F, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Reply to: “Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity”
by: Florent Mazel, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Reply to: “Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity”
by: Mazel, F, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Quantifying phylogenetic beta diversity: distinguishing between 'true' turnover of lineages and phylogenetic diversity gradients.
by: Fabien Leprieur, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Correction: Quantifying Phylogenetic Beta Diversity: Distinguishing between ‘True’ Turnover of Lineages and Phylogenetic Diversity Gradients.
by: Fabien Leprieur, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)