Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: The medical treatments of chronic heart failure have made remarkable progress in recent years. It is crucial to determine the optimal drug combination based on current evidence.Methods: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted for studies on angiotensin re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boyang Xiang, Zongliang Yu, Xiang Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.787810/full
_version_ 1798021287312883712
author Boyang Xiang
Zongliang Yu
Xiang Zhou
author_facet Boyang Xiang
Zongliang Yu
Xiang Zhou
author_sort Boyang Xiang
collection DOAJ
description Background: The medical treatments of chronic heart failure have made remarkable progress in recent years. It is crucial to determine the optimal drug combination based on current evidence.Methods: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted for studies on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and ivabradine (IVA) between 1987 and 2021. The network meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of drug therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).Results: Forty-eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which overall included 68,074 patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, were identified and included in the network meta-analysis. The efficacies of 13 intervention classes, including monotherapies or combinations of ACEI, ARB, ARNI, BB, MRA, SGLT2i, IVA, and placebo, on hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared. Among the 13 included interventions, ARNI+BB+MRA, SGLT2i+ACEI+BB+MRA, and IVA+ACEI+BB+MRA were found to be best in terms of all three outcomes. Compared with placebo, these three drug combinations were associated with significant reductions in the risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for HF.Conclusions: ARNI+BB+MRA, SGLT2i+ACEI+BB+MRA, and IVA+ACEI+BB+MRA were the top three therapies for patients with HFrEF. The increasing use of combinations of conventional and novel drugs contributed to progressive reductions in hospitalization and mortality in patients with HFrEF.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:11:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4247b1e755b043d6bf0ecc115ac60c53
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:11:14Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-4247b1e755b043d6bf0ecc115ac60c532022-12-22T04:12:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2022-01-01810.3389/fcvm.2021.787810787810Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure: A Network Meta-AnalysisBoyang Xiang0Zongliang Yu1Xiang Zhou2Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, The First People's Hospital of Kunshan Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Kunshan, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaBackground: The medical treatments of chronic heart failure have made remarkable progress in recent years. It is crucial to determine the optimal drug combination based on current evidence.Methods: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted for studies on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and ivabradine (IVA) between 1987 and 2021. The network meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of drug therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).Results: Forty-eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which overall included 68,074 patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, were identified and included in the network meta-analysis. The efficacies of 13 intervention classes, including monotherapies or combinations of ACEI, ARB, ARNI, BB, MRA, SGLT2i, IVA, and placebo, on hospitalization for HF, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared. Among the 13 included interventions, ARNI+BB+MRA, SGLT2i+ACEI+BB+MRA, and IVA+ACEI+BB+MRA were found to be best in terms of all three outcomes. Compared with placebo, these three drug combinations were associated with significant reductions in the risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for HF.Conclusions: ARNI+BB+MRA, SGLT2i+ACEI+BB+MRA, and IVA+ACEI+BB+MRA were the top three therapies for patients with HFrEF. The increasing use of combinations of conventional and novel drugs contributed to progressive reductions in hospitalization and mortality in patients with HFrEF.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.787810/fullchronic heart failuremedical treatmentmeta-analysishospitalizationmortality
spellingShingle Boyang Xiang
Zongliang Yu
Xiang Zhou
Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
chronic heart failure
medical treatment
meta-analysis
hospitalization
mortality
title Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of medical treatments for chronic heart failure a network meta analysis
topic chronic heart failure
medical treatment
meta-analysis
hospitalization
mortality
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.787810/full
work_keys_str_mv AT boyangxiang comparativeefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforchronicheartfailureanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zongliangyu comparativeefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforchronicheartfailureanetworkmetaanalysis
AT xiangzhou comparativeefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforchronicheartfailureanetworkmetaanalysis