Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations
Abstract Background Both mild and conventional controlled ovarian stimulation are the frequently used protocols for poor ovarian responders. However, there are some debates about which treatment is better. Moreover, little is known about the follicular physiology after the two ovarian stimulation pr...
Main Authors: | Xiaoping Liu, Huisi Mai, Panyu Chen, Zhiqiang Zhang, Taibao Wu, Jianhui Chen, Peng Sun, Chuanchuan Zhou, Xiaoyan Liang, Rui Huang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00926-1 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of ovarian stimulation in follicular and luteal phases in an ovarian cycle (DuoStim) in patients with poor ovarian response
by: Elham Naghshineh, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01) -
Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial
by: Joaquín Llácer, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Granulosa-cell tumor after ovarian stimulation: A case report
by: Zohreh Yousefi, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with or without clomiphene citrate for poor ovarian responders: a retrospective cohort study
by: Ahui Liu, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Conventional follicular-phase ovarian stimulation vs. luteal-phase stimulation in suboptimal responders: a randomized controlled trial
by: Jorge Suñol, M.D., et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)