Pooling of six respiratory samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A validation and cost study in a cohort in Lima, Peru

Background: The continuous evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to a high demand for diagnostic testing and major shortages in testing materials, especially in low- and middle-income countries. As an alternative to testing individual samples, pooling of respiratory samples has been suggested...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mayra Ochoa, Bia Peña, Omar Flores, Ana I. Gil, Lucie Ecker, Rubelio Cornejo, Leigh M. Howard, Carlos G. Grijalva, Claudio F. Lanata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023061121
_version_ 1827856147776798720
author Mayra Ochoa
Bia Peña
Omar Flores
Ana I. Gil
Lucie Ecker
Rubelio Cornejo
Leigh M. Howard
Carlos G. Grijalva
Claudio F. Lanata
author_facet Mayra Ochoa
Bia Peña
Omar Flores
Ana I. Gil
Lucie Ecker
Rubelio Cornejo
Leigh M. Howard
Carlos G. Grijalva
Claudio F. Lanata
author_sort Mayra Ochoa
collection DOAJ
description Background: The continuous evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to a high demand for diagnostic testing and major shortages in testing materials, especially in low- and middle-income countries. As an alternative to testing individual samples, pooling of respiratory samples has been suggested. Previous studies have assessed performance of pooling, mainly using nasopharyngeal samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, but few studies have examined the performance of pooling the more practical nasal swabs or saliva samples. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and potential cost reduction of pooling of nasal swab (NS) and saliva (SL) samples for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a community-based cohort study in Lima, Peru. Study design: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a community setting in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima-Peru. NS and SL samples were collected from 132 participants twice-a-week for a 2-month period. Pools of 2 to 12 samples of the same type, from participants of the same household, were tested by RT-PCR. After pooled testing, all individual samples from positive pools and all individual samples from randomly chosen negative pools were evaluated. For assessment of diagnostic performance, pool testing results were compared with results from individual testing, which served as reference, and concordance in pooled and individual test detections was evaluated. Laboratory costs for both types of samples and testing were compared. Results: A total of 2008 NS and 2002 SL samples were collected from 132 study participants. We tested 329 NS and 333 SL pools. The mean pool size for NS and SL pools was 6.22 (SD = 0.92) and 6.39 (SD = 1.71), respectively. Using individual testing as reference, NS pooling of 6 had a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 100%, respectively, with kappa of 0.97 (CI 95%: 0.93–1.00). The corresponding values for SL pooling of 6 were 83%, 100%, and 0.90 (CI 95%: 0.83–0.97). Compared with individual testing, pooling resulted in a cost reduction of 74.8% for NS and 72.4% for SL samples. Conclusions: Pooling easy-to-collect respiratory samples, especially NS, demonstrated very high diagnostic performance for detection of SARS-CoV-2 with substantial cost savings. This approach could be considered in large population screening programs, especially in LMIC.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:21:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-425476f948f44862b8e996ebccc88359
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:21:32Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-425476f948f44862b8e996ebccc883592023-08-30T05:53:02ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-08-0198e18904Pooling of six respiratory samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A validation and cost study in a cohort in Lima, PeruMayra Ochoa0Bia Peña1Omar Flores2Ana I. Gil3Lucie Ecker4Rubelio Cornejo5Leigh M. Howard6Carlos G. Grijalva7Claudio F. Lanata8Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima 15024, Peru; Corresponding author. Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Av. La Molina 1885, Lima 15024, Peru.Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima 15024, PeruInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima 15024, PeruInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima 15024, PeruInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima 15024, PeruInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima 15024, PeruVanderbilt University and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USAVanderbilt University and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USAInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima 15024, Peru; Vanderbilt University and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E, UKBackground: The continuous evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to a high demand for diagnostic testing and major shortages in testing materials, especially in low- and middle-income countries. As an alternative to testing individual samples, pooling of respiratory samples has been suggested. Previous studies have assessed performance of pooling, mainly using nasopharyngeal samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, but few studies have examined the performance of pooling the more practical nasal swabs or saliva samples. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and potential cost reduction of pooling of nasal swab (NS) and saliva (SL) samples for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a community-based cohort study in Lima, Peru. Study design: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a community setting in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima-Peru. NS and SL samples were collected from 132 participants twice-a-week for a 2-month period. Pools of 2 to 12 samples of the same type, from participants of the same household, were tested by RT-PCR. After pooled testing, all individual samples from positive pools and all individual samples from randomly chosen negative pools were evaluated. For assessment of diagnostic performance, pool testing results were compared with results from individual testing, which served as reference, and concordance in pooled and individual test detections was evaluated. Laboratory costs for both types of samples and testing were compared. Results: A total of 2008 NS and 2002 SL samples were collected from 132 study participants. We tested 329 NS and 333 SL pools. The mean pool size for NS and SL pools was 6.22 (SD = 0.92) and 6.39 (SD = 1.71), respectively. Using individual testing as reference, NS pooling of 6 had a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 100%, respectively, with kappa of 0.97 (CI 95%: 0.93–1.00). The corresponding values for SL pooling of 6 were 83%, 100%, and 0.90 (CI 95%: 0.83–0.97). Compared with individual testing, pooling resulted in a cost reduction of 74.8% for NS and 72.4% for SL samples. Conclusions: Pooling easy-to-collect respiratory samples, especially NS, demonstrated very high diagnostic performance for detection of SARS-CoV-2 with substantial cost savings. This approach could be considered in large population screening programs, especially in LMIC.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023061121SARS-CoV-2Nasal swabSaliva sampleSample poolsCostValidation
spellingShingle Mayra Ochoa
Bia Peña
Omar Flores
Ana I. Gil
Lucie Ecker
Rubelio Cornejo
Leigh M. Howard
Carlos G. Grijalva
Claudio F. Lanata
Pooling of six respiratory samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A validation and cost study in a cohort in Lima, Peru
Heliyon
SARS-CoV-2
Nasal swab
Saliva sample
Sample pools
Cost
Validation
title Pooling of six respiratory samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A validation and cost study in a cohort in Lima, Peru
title_full Pooling of six respiratory samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A validation and cost study in a cohort in Lima, Peru
title_fullStr Pooling of six respiratory samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A validation and cost study in a cohort in Lima, Peru
title_full_unstemmed Pooling of six respiratory samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A validation and cost study in a cohort in Lima, Peru
title_short Pooling of six respiratory samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A validation and cost study in a cohort in Lima, Peru
title_sort pooling of six respiratory samples for the detection of sars cov 2 a validation and cost study in a cohort in lima peru
topic SARS-CoV-2
Nasal swab
Saliva sample
Sample pools
Cost
Validation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023061121
work_keys_str_mv AT mayraochoa poolingofsixrespiratorysamplesforthedetectionofsarscov2avalidationandcoststudyinacohortinlimaperu
AT biapena poolingofsixrespiratorysamplesforthedetectionofsarscov2avalidationandcoststudyinacohortinlimaperu
AT omarflores poolingofsixrespiratorysamplesforthedetectionofsarscov2avalidationandcoststudyinacohortinlimaperu
AT anaigil poolingofsixrespiratorysamplesforthedetectionofsarscov2avalidationandcoststudyinacohortinlimaperu
AT lucieecker poolingofsixrespiratorysamplesforthedetectionofsarscov2avalidationandcoststudyinacohortinlimaperu
AT rubeliocornejo poolingofsixrespiratorysamplesforthedetectionofsarscov2avalidationandcoststudyinacohortinlimaperu
AT leighmhoward poolingofsixrespiratorysamplesforthedetectionofsarscov2avalidationandcoststudyinacohortinlimaperu
AT carlosggrijalva poolingofsixrespiratorysamplesforthedetectionofsarscov2avalidationandcoststudyinacohortinlimaperu
AT claudioflanata poolingofsixrespiratorysamplesforthedetectionofsarscov2avalidationandcoststudyinacohortinlimaperu