A global design principle for polysulfide electrocatalysis in lithium–sulfur batteries—A computational perspective

Abstract Widespread commercialization of high‐energy‐density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries is difficult due to the lithium polysulfide, Li2Sn (n = 4, 6, 8), shuttle effect. Efficient adsorption/conversion of Li2Sn species on an electrocatalytic surface can suppress the shuttle effect. Modeling of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akhil M. Abraham, Thilini Boteju, Sathish Ponnurangam, Venkataraman Thangadurai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-07-01
Series:Battery Energy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bte2.20220003
_version_ 1811295216726966272
author Akhil M. Abraham
Thilini Boteju
Sathish Ponnurangam
Venkataraman Thangadurai
author_facet Akhil M. Abraham
Thilini Boteju
Sathish Ponnurangam
Venkataraman Thangadurai
author_sort Akhil M. Abraham
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Widespread commercialization of high‐energy‐density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries is difficult due to the lithium polysulfide, Li2Sn (n = 4, 6, 8), shuttle effect. Efficient adsorption/conversion of Li2Sn species on an electrocatalytic surface can suppress the shuttle effect. Modeling of the adsorption of Li2Sn species using density functional theory (DFT) calculations has contributed significantly toward an understanding of their anchoring mechanism at a surface. Different surfaces show a unique range of binding energies for faster Li2Sn adsorption/reaction kinetics. To predict the optimum binding energy zone, a systematic DFT study is performed on transition‐metal sulfide (TMS) surfaces including TiS2, VS2, NbS2, MoS2, WS2, and SnS2. The investigation revealed that the geometric properties at the anchoring site possibly regulate the adsorption energy of Li2Sn species. A geometry parameter, Gscore, is defined as a function of bond length and number of lithium‐atom interactions between the Li2Sn species and the binding surface. The design principle is extended to sulfur‐deficient (TMSs‐x) and edge‐exposed (TMS(100)) surfaces. The Gscore predicts the most effective binding energy zone distinctive to these materials—TMS (1.7–2.1 eV/Gscore ≥ 2.0), TMSs‐x (2.0–2.8 eV/Gscore ≥ 2.1), and TMS(100) (2.5–3.2 eV/Gscore ≥ 1.09).
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:29:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-42679c4700984b8c896991476ad1f1ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2768-1696
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:29:14Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Battery Energy
spelling doaj.art-42679c4700984b8c896991476ad1f1ed2022-12-22T03:00:29ZengWileyBattery Energy2768-16962022-07-0113n/an/a10.1002/bte2.20220003A global design principle for polysulfide electrocatalysis in lithium–sulfur batteries—A computational perspectiveAkhil M. Abraham0Thilini Boteju1Sathish Ponnurangam2Venkataraman Thangadurai3Department of Chemistry University of Calgary Calgary Alberta CanadaDepartment of Chemistry University of Calgary Calgary Alberta CanadaDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering University of Calgary Calgary Alberta CanadaDepartment of Chemistry University of Calgary Calgary Alberta CanadaAbstract Widespread commercialization of high‐energy‐density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries is difficult due to the lithium polysulfide, Li2Sn (n = 4, 6, 8), shuttle effect. Efficient adsorption/conversion of Li2Sn species on an electrocatalytic surface can suppress the shuttle effect. Modeling of the adsorption of Li2Sn species using density functional theory (DFT) calculations has contributed significantly toward an understanding of their anchoring mechanism at a surface. Different surfaces show a unique range of binding energies for faster Li2Sn adsorption/reaction kinetics. To predict the optimum binding energy zone, a systematic DFT study is performed on transition‐metal sulfide (TMS) surfaces including TiS2, VS2, NbS2, MoS2, WS2, and SnS2. The investigation revealed that the geometric properties at the anchoring site possibly regulate the adsorption energy of Li2Sn species. A geometry parameter, Gscore, is defined as a function of bond length and number of lithium‐atom interactions between the Li2Sn species and the binding surface. The design principle is extended to sulfur‐deficient (TMSs‐x) and edge‐exposed (TMS(100)) surfaces. The Gscore predicts the most effective binding energy zone distinctive to these materials—TMS (1.7–2.1 eV/Gscore ≥ 2.0), TMSs‐x (2.0–2.8 eV/Gscore ≥ 2.1), and TMS(100) (2.5–3.2 eV/Gscore ≥ 1.09).https://doi.org/10.1002/bte2.20220003anchoring mechanismdensity functional theory calculationslithium–sulfur batterytransition‐metal sulfidesRational Design of High‐Loading Sulfur Cathodes with a Poached‐Egg‐Shaped Architecture for Long‐Cycle Lithium−Sulfur Batteries
spellingShingle Akhil M. Abraham
Thilini Boteju
Sathish Ponnurangam
Venkataraman Thangadurai
A global design principle for polysulfide electrocatalysis in lithium–sulfur batteries—A computational perspective
Battery Energy
anchoring mechanism
density functional theory calculations
lithium–sulfur battery
transition‐metal sulfides
Rational Design of High‐Loading Sulfur Cathodes with a Poached‐Egg‐Shaped Architecture for Long‐Cycle Lithium−Sulfur Batteries
title A global design principle for polysulfide electrocatalysis in lithium–sulfur batteries—A computational perspective
title_full A global design principle for polysulfide electrocatalysis in lithium–sulfur batteries—A computational perspective
title_fullStr A global design principle for polysulfide electrocatalysis in lithium–sulfur batteries—A computational perspective
title_full_unstemmed A global design principle for polysulfide electrocatalysis in lithium–sulfur batteries—A computational perspective
title_short A global design principle for polysulfide electrocatalysis in lithium–sulfur batteries—A computational perspective
title_sort global design principle for polysulfide electrocatalysis in lithium sulfur batteries a computational perspective
topic anchoring mechanism
density functional theory calculations
lithium–sulfur battery
transition‐metal sulfides
Rational Design of High‐Loading Sulfur Cathodes with a Poached‐Egg‐Shaped Architecture for Long‐Cycle Lithium−Sulfur Batteries
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bte2.20220003
work_keys_str_mv AT akhilmabraham aglobaldesignprincipleforpolysulfideelectrocatalysisinlithiumsulfurbatteriesacomputationalperspective
AT thiliniboteju aglobaldesignprincipleforpolysulfideelectrocatalysisinlithiumsulfurbatteriesacomputationalperspective
AT sathishponnurangam aglobaldesignprincipleforpolysulfideelectrocatalysisinlithiumsulfurbatteriesacomputationalperspective
AT venkataramanthangadurai aglobaldesignprincipleforpolysulfideelectrocatalysisinlithiumsulfurbatteriesacomputationalperspective
AT akhilmabraham globaldesignprincipleforpolysulfideelectrocatalysisinlithiumsulfurbatteriesacomputationalperspective
AT thiliniboteju globaldesignprincipleforpolysulfideelectrocatalysisinlithiumsulfurbatteriesacomputationalperspective
AT sathishponnurangam globaldesignprincipleforpolysulfideelectrocatalysisinlithiumsulfurbatteriesacomputationalperspective
AT venkataramanthangadurai globaldesignprincipleforpolysulfideelectrocatalysisinlithiumsulfurbatteriesacomputationalperspective