Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for Taiwan
This paper revisits the status prospects for Taiwan in light of recent events in Kosovo and Tibet. In both cases, and certainly in Taiwan itself, the long standing contest between claims for self determination and the tenacious defence of the principle of the territorial integrity of states has emer...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Island Studies Journal
2008-05-01
|
Series: | Island Studies Journal |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.218 |
_version_ | 1797801167518957568 |
---|---|
author | Barry Bartmann |
author_facet | Barry Bartmann |
author_sort | Barry Bartmann |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper revisits the status prospects for Taiwan in light of recent events in Kosovo and Tibet. In both cases, and certainly in Taiwan itself, the long standing contest between claims for self determination and the tenacious defence of the principle of the territorial integrity of states has emerged once again to dominate the analysis of these cases. This contest is particularly dramatic in the divided international response to the independence of Kosovo. In the case of Tibet, widespread international support for Tibet is in sharp contrast to the furious and determined resistance of China. Taiwan’s anomalous status remains that of a legal sovereign state, the Republic of China, enjoying some measure of recognition and formal diplomacy and a de facto state whose international relations are confined to paradiplomatic channels, extensive though they are. The paper considers the prospects for changes in the current anomalous status of the island state. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T04:46:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-42735793e8d249a88336bcd80a7505cc |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1715-2593 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T04:46:19Z |
publishDate | 2008-05-01 |
publisher | Island Studies Journal |
record_format | Article |
series | Island Studies Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-42735793e8d249a88336bcd80a7505cc2023-06-18T12:58:45ZengIsland Studies JournalIsland Studies Journal1715-25932008-05-0131Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for TaiwanBarry BartmannThis paper revisits the status prospects for Taiwan in light of recent events in Kosovo and Tibet. In both cases, and certainly in Taiwan itself, the long standing contest between claims for self determination and the tenacious defence of the principle of the territorial integrity of states has emerged once again to dominate the analysis of these cases. This contest is particularly dramatic in the divided international response to the independence of Kosovo. In the case of Tibet, widespread international support for Tibet is in sharp contrast to the furious and determined resistance of China. Taiwan’s anomalous status remains that of a legal sovereign state, the Republic of China, enjoying some measure of recognition and formal diplomacy and a de facto state whose international relations are confined to paradiplomatic channels, extensive though they are. The paper considers the prospects for changes in the current anomalous status of the island state.https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.218 |
spellingShingle | Barry Bartmann Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for Taiwan Island Studies Journal |
title | Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for Taiwan |
title_full | Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for Taiwan |
title_fullStr | Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for Taiwan |
title_full_unstemmed | Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for Taiwan |
title_short | Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for Taiwan |
title_sort | between de jure and de facto statehood revisiting the status issue for taiwan |
url | https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barrybartmann betweendejureanddefactostatehoodrevisitingthestatusissuefortaiwan |