Axial compression capacity of concrete columns reinforced with corrosion-resistant metallic reinforcement

Abstract Axial compression performance of concrete columns reinforced with 2304 solid stainless bars and spirals, carbon steel bars and spirals, and 316 L stainless steel clad bars is examined after the columns are exposed to severe corrosion. Two groups of columns were investigated: a control group...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John W. Wright, Chris P. Pantelides
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-021-00016-3
_version_ 1819050760003911680
author John W. Wright
Chris P. Pantelides
author_facet John W. Wright
Chris P. Pantelides
author_sort John W. Wright
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Axial compression performance of concrete columns reinforced with 2304 solid stainless bars and spirals, carbon steel bars and spirals, and 316 L stainless steel clad bars is examined after the columns are exposed to severe corrosion. Two groups of columns were investigated: a control group, and a group submerged in a 5.0% by weight chloride solution subjected to accelerated corrosion. A relatively high impressed current density of 8.5 μA/mm2 was used and after 60 days of accelerated corrosion the columns were tested to failure under axial compression. In terms of mass loss per unit of corrosion energy, columns reinforced with stainless steel spirals and either solid stainless or stainless clad vertical bars were 197% more corrosion resistant than carbon steel. Bars made with 2304 solid stainless steel and 316 L stainless clad materials developed localized pitting corrosion that led to degradation of the concrete cover and a larger drop in axial compression than carbon steel reinforced columns. However, the carbon steel reinforced columns reached lower failure displacements and a corroded carbon steel reinforced column was the only column to experience sudden failure prior to reaching its theoretical maximum axial compression capacity. Axial compression capacity of the columns in both the control and corroded conditions was modeled using concrete confinement models that produced good agreement with the experimental results.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T11:53:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-42769dbd2a4f4a75a29cc7337c76df44
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-2521
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T11:53:10Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
spelling doaj.art-42769dbd2a4f4a75a29cc7337c76df442022-12-21T19:05:00ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience2662-25212021-02-012111510.1186/s43065-021-00016-3Axial compression capacity of concrete columns reinforced with corrosion-resistant metallic reinforcementJohn W. Wright0Chris P. Pantelides1DMWPVDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of UtahAbstract Axial compression performance of concrete columns reinforced with 2304 solid stainless bars and spirals, carbon steel bars and spirals, and 316 L stainless steel clad bars is examined after the columns are exposed to severe corrosion. Two groups of columns were investigated: a control group, and a group submerged in a 5.0% by weight chloride solution subjected to accelerated corrosion. A relatively high impressed current density of 8.5 μA/mm2 was used and after 60 days of accelerated corrosion the columns were tested to failure under axial compression. In terms of mass loss per unit of corrosion energy, columns reinforced with stainless steel spirals and either solid stainless or stainless clad vertical bars were 197% more corrosion resistant than carbon steel. Bars made with 2304 solid stainless steel and 316 L stainless clad materials developed localized pitting corrosion that led to degradation of the concrete cover and a larger drop in axial compression than carbon steel reinforced columns. However, the carbon steel reinforced columns reached lower failure displacements and a corroded carbon steel reinforced column was the only column to experience sudden failure prior to reaching its theoretical maximum axial compression capacity. Axial compression capacity of the columns in both the control and corroded conditions was modeled using concrete confinement models that produced good agreement with the experimental results.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-021-00016-3Carbon steelColumnCompression testConcreteConfinementCorrosion test
spellingShingle John W. Wright
Chris P. Pantelides
Axial compression capacity of concrete columns reinforced with corrosion-resistant metallic reinforcement
Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
Carbon steel
Column
Compression test
Concrete
Confinement
Corrosion test
title Axial compression capacity of concrete columns reinforced with corrosion-resistant metallic reinforcement
title_full Axial compression capacity of concrete columns reinforced with corrosion-resistant metallic reinforcement
title_fullStr Axial compression capacity of concrete columns reinforced with corrosion-resistant metallic reinforcement
title_full_unstemmed Axial compression capacity of concrete columns reinforced with corrosion-resistant metallic reinforcement
title_short Axial compression capacity of concrete columns reinforced with corrosion-resistant metallic reinforcement
title_sort axial compression capacity of concrete columns reinforced with corrosion resistant metallic reinforcement
topic Carbon steel
Column
Compression test
Concrete
Confinement
Corrosion test
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-021-00016-3
work_keys_str_mv AT johnwwright axialcompressioncapacityofconcretecolumnsreinforcedwithcorrosionresistantmetallicreinforcement
AT chrisppantelides axialcompressioncapacityofconcretecolumnsreinforcedwithcorrosionresistantmetallicreinforcement