Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia
Abstract Background This study sought to compare the visual quality between intraocular collamer lens (EVO-ICL) implantation and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and determine the appropriate surgical method to treat patients with high myopia (− 6.25 to − 10 D). Methods A total of 48 eyes...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2019-02-01
|
| Series: | BMC Ophthalmology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-019-1029-x |
| _version_ | 1818291961228951552 |
|---|---|
| author | Qin Qin Lianyun Bao Liping Yang Zifang He Zhenping Huang |
| author_facet | Qin Qin Lianyun Bao Liping Yang Zifang He Zhenping Huang |
| author_sort | Qin Qin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background This study sought to compare the visual quality between intraocular collamer lens (EVO-ICL) implantation and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and determine the appropriate surgical method to treat patients with high myopia (− 6.25 to − 10 D). Methods A total of 48 eyes underwent EVO-ICL implantation and another 48 eyes underwent SMILE. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) and equivalent spherical degree were compared across the SMILE (− 6.25 to − 10 D) and EVO-ICL (− 6.25 to − 10 D) implantation groups. Preoperative and postoperative visual quality parameters were compared between and within groups. Results The OQAS II values (OV 100%) one week and one month after surgery and the modulation transfer function (MTF), OV 20% and OV 9% values one week after surgery in the SMILE group were lower than the respective preoperative values. The objective scatter index (OSI) value increased one week as well as one month after surgery compared with the preoperative values. The MTF cut-off value of the SMILE group was lower than that of the EVO-ICL implantation group three months after surgery. Conclusions For patients with high myopia, the postoperative visual quality of EVO- ICL implantation was slightly better than that of SMILE. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T02:52:23Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-429d449cd6e04e6cabdd4364662780bf |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2415 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T02:52:23Z |
| publishDate | 2019-02-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Ophthalmology |
| spelling | doaj.art-429d449cd6e04e6cabdd4364662780bf2022-12-22T00:02:01ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152019-02-011911910.1186/s12886-019-1029-xComparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopiaQin Qin0Lianyun Bao1Liping Yang2Zifang He3Zhenping Huang4Department of Ophthalmology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical SchoolDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jinling Medical School of Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical SchoolDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jinling Medical School of Nanjing Medical UniversityAbstract Background This study sought to compare the visual quality between intraocular collamer lens (EVO-ICL) implantation and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and determine the appropriate surgical method to treat patients with high myopia (− 6.25 to − 10 D). Methods A total of 48 eyes underwent EVO-ICL implantation and another 48 eyes underwent SMILE. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) and equivalent spherical degree were compared across the SMILE (− 6.25 to − 10 D) and EVO-ICL (− 6.25 to − 10 D) implantation groups. Preoperative and postoperative visual quality parameters were compared between and within groups. Results The OQAS II values (OV 100%) one week and one month after surgery and the modulation transfer function (MTF), OV 20% and OV 9% values one week after surgery in the SMILE group were lower than the respective preoperative values. The objective scatter index (OSI) value increased one week as well as one month after surgery compared with the preoperative values. The MTF cut-off value of the SMILE group was lower than that of the EVO-ICL implantation group three months after surgery. Conclusions For patients with high myopia, the postoperative visual quality of EVO- ICL implantation was slightly better than that of SMILE.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-019-1029-xMyopiaEVO intraocular collamer lensSmall-incision lenticule extraction |
| spellingShingle | Qin Qin Lianyun Bao Liping Yang Zifang He Zhenping Huang Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia BMC Ophthalmology Myopia EVO intraocular collamer lens Small-incision lenticule extraction |
| title | Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia |
| title_full | Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia |
| title_short | Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia |
| title_sort | comparison of visual quality after evo icl implantation and smile to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia |
| topic | Myopia EVO intraocular collamer lens Small-incision lenticule extraction |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-019-1029-x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT qinqin comparisonofvisualqualityafterevoiclimplantationandsmiletoselecttheappropriatesurgicalmethodforhighmyopia AT lianyunbao comparisonofvisualqualityafterevoiclimplantationandsmiletoselecttheappropriatesurgicalmethodforhighmyopia AT lipingyang comparisonofvisualqualityafterevoiclimplantationandsmiletoselecttheappropriatesurgicalmethodforhighmyopia AT zifanghe comparisonofvisualqualityafterevoiclimplantationandsmiletoselecttheappropriatesurgicalmethodforhighmyopia AT zhenpinghuang comparisonofvisualqualityafterevoiclimplantationandsmiletoselecttheappropriatesurgicalmethodforhighmyopia |