The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at Scale

The anatomic validity of structural connectomes remains a significant uncertainty in neuroimaging. Edge-centric tractography reconstructs streamlines in bundles between each pair of cortical or subcortical regions. Although edge bundles provides a stronger anatomic embedding than traditional connect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph Y. Moon, Pratik Mukherjee, Ravi K. Madduri, Amy J. Markowitz, Lanya T. Cai, Eva M. Palacios, Geoffrey T. Manley, Peer-Timo Bremer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2022.752471/full
_version_ 1828796171816009728
author Joseph Y. Moon
Pratik Mukherjee
Ravi K. Madduri
Amy J. Markowitz
Lanya T. Cai
Eva M. Palacios
Geoffrey T. Manley
Peer-Timo Bremer
author_facet Joseph Y. Moon
Pratik Mukherjee
Ravi K. Madduri
Amy J. Markowitz
Lanya T. Cai
Eva M. Palacios
Geoffrey T. Manley
Peer-Timo Bremer
author_sort Joseph Y. Moon
collection DOAJ
description The anatomic validity of structural connectomes remains a significant uncertainty in neuroimaging. Edge-centric tractography reconstructs streamlines in bundles between each pair of cortical or subcortical regions. Although edge bundles provides a stronger anatomic embedding than traditional connectomes, calculating them for each region-pair requires exponentially greater computation. We observe that major speedup can be achieved by reducing the number of streamlines used by probabilistic tractography algorithms. To ensure this does not degrade connectome quality, we calculate the identifiability of edge-centric connectomes between test and re-test sessions as a proxy for information content. We find that running PROBTRACKX2 with as few as 1 streamline per voxel per region-pair has no significant impact on identifiability. Variation in identifiability caused by streamline count is overshadowed by variation due to subject demographics. This finding even holds true in an entirely different tractography algorithm using MRTrix. Incidentally, we observe that Jaccard similarity is more effective than Pearson correlation in calculating identifiability for our subject population.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T04:18:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-42c14f1ab570427086f5ff977a995ab4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5196
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T04:18:02Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
spelling doaj.art-42c14f1ab570427086f5ff977a995ab42022-12-22T00:38:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroinformatics1662-51962022-05-011610.3389/fninf.2022.752471752471The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at ScaleJoseph Y. Moon0Pratik Mukherjee1Ravi K. Madduri2Amy J. Markowitz3Lanya T. Cai4Eva M. Palacios5Geoffrey T. Manley6Peer-Timo Bremer7Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesArgonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United StatesThe anatomic validity of structural connectomes remains a significant uncertainty in neuroimaging. Edge-centric tractography reconstructs streamlines in bundles between each pair of cortical or subcortical regions. Although edge bundles provides a stronger anatomic embedding than traditional connectomes, calculating them for each region-pair requires exponentially greater computation. We observe that major speedup can be achieved by reducing the number of streamlines used by probabilistic tractography algorithms. To ensure this does not degrade connectome quality, we calculate the identifiability of edge-centric connectomes between test and re-test sessions as a proxy for information content. We find that running PROBTRACKX2 with as few as 1 streamline per voxel per region-pair has no significant impact on identifiability. Variation in identifiability caused by streamline count is overshadowed by variation due to subject demographics. This finding even holds true in an entirely different tractography algorithm using MRTrix. Incidentally, we observe that Jaccard similarity is more effective than Pearson correlation in calculating identifiability for our subject population.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2022.752471/fullconnectomesidentifiabilitytractographydiffusion MRIoptimizationEDI
spellingShingle Joseph Y. Moon
Pratik Mukherjee
Ravi K. Madduri
Amy J. Markowitz
Lanya T. Cai
Eva M. Palacios
Geoffrey T. Manley
Peer-Timo Bremer
The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at Scale
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
connectomes
identifiability
tractography
diffusion MRI
optimization
EDI
title The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at Scale
title_full The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at Scale
title_fullStr The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at Scale
title_full_unstemmed The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at Scale
title_short The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at Scale
title_sort case for optimized edge centric tractography at scale
topic connectomes
identifiability
tractography
diffusion MRI
optimization
EDI
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2022.752471/full
work_keys_str_mv AT josephymoon thecaseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT pratikmukherjee thecaseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT ravikmadduri thecaseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT amyjmarkowitz thecaseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT lanyatcai thecaseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT evampalacios thecaseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT geoffreytmanley thecaseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT peertimobremer thecaseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT josephymoon caseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT pratikmukherjee caseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT ravikmadduri caseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT amyjmarkowitz caseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT lanyatcai caseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT evampalacios caseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT geoffreytmanley caseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale
AT peertimobremer caseforoptimizededgecentrictractographyatscale