Dispute over the 1974 MoU Box between Indonesia and Australia: How MoU Legally Binding in Two Countries?
This study aims to delineate the legal authority of Memorandum of Understanding (MoUs) within the jurisdictions of Indonesia and Australia, particularly concerning the resolution of international civil law disputes. The research employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing legal reviews and sec...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Negeri Semarang
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesian Law Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ipmhi/article/view/76236 |
| _version_ | 1797245474211627008 |
|---|---|
| author | Salwa Noviana Putri Ariq Fazari Nico Ari Widodo Faishal Fatahillah Satria Dwinugraha |
| author_facet | Salwa Noviana Putri Ariq Fazari Nico Ari Widodo Faishal Fatahillah Satria Dwinugraha |
| author_sort | Salwa Noviana Putri |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study aims to delineate the legal authority of Memorandum of Understanding (MoUs) within the jurisdictions of Indonesia and Australia, particularly concerning the resolution of international civil law disputes. The research employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing legal reviews and secondary data for support. The findings reveal that in civil law states, notably Indonesia, MoUs are regarded as binding agreements in accordance with the "Agreement is Agreement" perspective as per Article 1338 (1) of the Civil Code. Conversely, common law states, such as Australia, generally perceive MoUs as non-legally binding. However, an MoU may attain validity and binding status if it fulfills the six stipulated requirements outlined in Australian contract law. To address the dispute surrounding the 1974 MoU BOX between Indonesia and Australia, resolution options include examining international civil law rules based on primary and secondary links or resorting to an international arbitral tribunal. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T19:27:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-42c47575afd0473d9b5df6737721a830 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2797-8508 2807-8330 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T19:27:29Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Negeri Semarang |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesian Law Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-42c47575afd0473d9b5df6737721a8302024-03-25T14:43:43ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangIkatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesian Law Journal2797-85082807-83302024-01-0141152610.15294/ipmhi.v4i1.7623676236Dispute over the 1974 MoU Box between Indonesia and Australia: How MoU Legally Binding in Two Countries?Salwa Noviana Putri0Ariq Fazari1Nico Ari Widodo2Faishal Fatahillah3Satria Dwinugraha4Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran JakartaUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran JakartaUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran JakartaUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran JakartaUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran JakartaThis study aims to delineate the legal authority of Memorandum of Understanding (MoUs) within the jurisdictions of Indonesia and Australia, particularly concerning the resolution of international civil law disputes. The research employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing legal reviews and secondary data for support. The findings reveal that in civil law states, notably Indonesia, MoUs are regarded as binding agreements in accordance with the "Agreement is Agreement" perspective as per Article 1338 (1) of the Civil Code. Conversely, common law states, such as Australia, generally perceive MoUs as non-legally binding. However, an MoU may attain validity and binding status if it fulfills the six stipulated requirements outlined in Australian contract law. To address the dispute surrounding the 1974 MoU BOX between Indonesia and Australia, resolution options include examining international civil law rules based on primary and secondary links or resorting to an international arbitral tribunal.https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ipmhi/article/view/76236mou box 1974memorandum of understandingagreement |
| spellingShingle | Salwa Noviana Putri Ariq Fazari Nico Ari Widodo Faishal Fatahillah Satria Dwinugraha Dispute over the 1974 MoU Box between Indonesia and Australia: How MoU Legally Binding in Two Countries? Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesian Law Journal mou box 1974 memorandum of understanding agreement |
| title | Dispute over the 1974 MoU Box between Indonesia and Australia: How MoU Legally Binding in Two Countries? |
| title_full | Dispute over the 1974 MoU Box between Indonesia and Australia: How MoU Legally Binding in Two Countries? |
| title_fullStr | Dispute over the 1974 MoU Box between Indonesia and Australia: How MoU Legally Binding in Two Countries? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dispute over the 1974 MoU Box between Indonesia and Australia: How MoU Legally Binding in Two Countries? |
| title_short | Dispute over the 1974 MoU Box between Indonesia and Australia: How MoU Legally Binding in Two Countries? |
| title_sort | dispute over the 1974 mou box between indonesia and australia how mou legally binding in two countries |
| topic | mou box 1974 memorandum of understanding agreement |
| url | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ipmhi/article/view/76236 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT salwanovianaputri disputeoverthe1974mouboxbetweenindonesiaandaustraliahowmoulegallybindingintwocountries AT ariqfazari disputeoverthe1974mouboxbetweenindonesiaandaustraliahowmoulegallybindingintwocountries AT nicoariwidodo disputeoverthe1974mouboxbetweenindonesiaandaustraliahowmoulegallybindingintwocountries AT faishalfatahillah disputeoverthe1974mouboxbetweenindonesiaandaustraliahowmoulegallybindingintwocountries AT satriadwinugraha disputeoverthe1974mouboxbetweenindonesiaandaustraliahowmoulegallybindingintwocountries |