Subjective Impression of an Office with Biophilic Design and Blue Lighting: A Pilot Study

This paper investigates and compares people’s subjective impression of an office with a biophilic design and blue lighting. Existing studies have examined their influence on perception separately, but how they compare is unclear. Additionally, only a few studies have used an office setting as a case...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiarong Xie, Azadeh Omidfar Sawyer, Siqing Ge, Tian Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/1/42
_version_ 1797445125147721728
author Jiarong Xie
Azadeh Omidfar Sawyer
Siqing Ge
Tian Li
author_facet Jiarong Xie
Azadeh Omidfar Sawyer
Siqing Ge
Tian Li
author_sort Jiarong Xie
collection DOAJ
description This paper investigates and compares people’s subjective impression of an office with a biophilic design and blue lighting. Existing studies have examined their influence on perception separately, but how they compare is unclear. Additionally, only a few studies have used an office setting as a case study. To address this research gap, this study collected people’s ratings and rankings of four simulated interior scenes of a private office using an online survey. The scenes include blue lighting, a biophilic design with daylight and view, a biophilic design with indoor plants, and a non-biophilic baseline with conventional white lighting. A total of 284 complete responses were collected and analyzed using a mixed-effect model. It was found that the two biophilic designs improved people’s perception of the office compared to the base case. The biophilic design with access to daylight and view outperformed the space with indoor plants in all the examined perceptual categories, specifically how the office space was perceived by participants as brighter, more comfortable, and spacious. On the contrary, the space with blue lighting decreased people’s ratings in most perceptual attributes in comparison to the baseline. The negative influence was notably significant in how lively, comfortable, bright, and appealing the space was perceived as being by participants. Subjects’ preference rankings of the four simulated office spaces showed a similar pattern.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T13:21:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-42dfa92b65f44d1698b9e9bfc3374acd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T13:21:13Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-42dfa92b65f44d1698b9e9bfc3374acd2023-11-30T21:29:04ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092022-12-011314210.3390/buildings13010042Subjective Impression of an Office with Biophilic Design and Blue Lighting: A Pilot StudyJiarong Xie0Azadeh Omidfar Sawyer1Siqing Ge2Tian Li3School of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USASchool of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USASchool of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USASchool of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USAThis paper investigates and compares people’s subjective impression of an office with a biophilic design and blue lighting. Existing studies have examined their influence on perception separately, but how they compare is unclear. Additionally, only a few studies have used an office setting as a case study. To address this research gap, this study collected people’s ratings and rankings of four simulated interior scenes of a private office using an online survey. The scenes include blue lighting, a biophilic design with daylight and view, a biophilic design with indoor plants, and a non-biophilic baseline with conventional white lighting. A total of 284 complete responses were collected and analyzed using a mixed-effect model. It was found that the two biophilic designs improved people’s perception of the office compared to the base case. The biophilic design with access to daylight and view outperformed the space with indoor plants in all the examined perceptual categories, specifically how the office space was perceived by participants as brighter, more comfortable, and spacious. On the contrary, the space with blue lighting decreased people’s ratings in most perceptual attributes in comparison to the baseline. The negative influence was notably significant in how lively, comfortable, bright, and appealing the space was perceived as being by participants. Subjects’ preference rankings of the four simulated office spaces showed a similar pattern.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/1/42human perceptionbiophilic designblue lightcomputer rendering
spellingShingle Jiarong Xie
Azadeh Omidfar Sawyer
Siqing Ge
Tian Li
Subjective Impression of an Office with Biophilic Design and Blue Lighting: A Pilot Study
Buildings
human perception
biophilic design
blue light
computer rendering
title Subjective Impression of an Office with Biophilic Design and Blue Lighting: A Pilot Study
title_full Subjective Impression of an Office with Biophilic Design and Blue Lighting: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Subjective Impression of an Office with Biophilic Design and Blue Lighting: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Subjective Impression of an Office with Biophilic Design and Blue Lighting: A Pilot Study
title_short Subjective Impression of an Office with Biophilic Design and Blue Lighting: A Pilot Study
title_sort subjective impression of an office with biophilic design and blue lighting a pilot study
topic human perception
biophilic design
blue light
computer rendering
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/1/42
work_keys_str_mv AT jiarongxie subjectiveimpressionofanofficewithbiophilicdesignandbluelightingapilotstudy
AT azadehomidfarsawyer subjectiveimpressionofanofficewithbiophilicdesignandbluelightingapilotstudy
AT siqingge subjectiveimpressionofanofficewithbiophilicdesignandbluelightingapilotstudy
AT tianli subjectiveimpressionofanofficewithbiophilicdesignandbluelightingapilotstudy