Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution

This article argues that access to judges is an essential element of access to justice. Traditional civil litigation procedure aimed at preparation for trial that is complex, time-consuming and costly obstructs such access, especially for litigants without lawyers. To remedy this, the author propose...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Archie Zariski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2018-05-01
Series:The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
Online Access:https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/5789
_version_ 1797710628858626048
author Archie Zariski
author_facet Archie Zariski
author_sort Archie Zariski
collection DOAJ
description This article argues that access to judges is an essential element of access to justice. Traditional civil litigation procedure aimed at preparation for trial that is complex, time-consuming and costly obstructs such access, especially for litigants without lawyers. To remedy this, the author proposes a summary judicial dispute resolution procedure comprising two stages: early judicial intervention followed by judicial dispute resolution that is determinative if necessary. At both points litigants would be given the opportunity to settle their dispute consensually, thus combining principles of self-determination with final disposition according to law. The proposal draws on and extends contemporary innovations in Canadian courts concerning summary proceedings and binding judicial dispute resolution. The new procedure should improve access to judges and thus access to justice.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T06:54:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-42e684b64e824165acef21dfabf9cb0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-5017
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T06:54:57Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
spelling doaj.art-42e684b64e824165acef21dfabf9cb0f2023-09-03T00:06:09ZengUniversity of WindsorThe Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice2561-50172018-05-013510.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5789Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute ResolutionArchie Zariski0Athabasca UniversityThis article argues that access to judges is an essential element of access to justice. Traditional civil litigation procedure aimed at preparation for trial that is complex, time-consuming and costly obstructs such access, especially for litigants without lawyers. To remedy this, the author proposes a summary judicial dispute resolution procedure comprising two stages: early judicial intervention followed by judicial dispute resolution that is determinative if necessary. At both points litigants would be given the opportunity to settle their dispute consensually, thus combining principles of self-determination with final disposition according to law. The proposal draws on and extends contemporary innovations in Canadian courts concerning summary proceedings and binding judicial dispute resolution. The new procedure should improve access to judges and thus access to justice.https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/5789
spellingShingle Archie Zariski
Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution
The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
title Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution
title_full Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution
title_fullStr Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution
title_full_unstemmed Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution
title_short Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution
title_sort judicial dispute resolution in canada towards accessible dispute resolution
url https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/5789
work_keys_str_mv AT archiezariski judicialdisputeresolutionincanadatowardsaccessibledisputeresolution