An Analysis of the Originality of “Islamic Ethics”

The purpose of the present study is an analysis of the originality of “Islamic ethics”. Using descriptive analysis, this research reviews the viewpoint of the deniers of “Islamic ethics”. In this regard, the study is focused on the viewpoints of those who have refuted “Islamic ethics” as well as the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akbar Panahi Darcheh, Masoumeh Pourrajab, Kolsoom Gholami Andrati
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Farhangian University 2021-05-01
Series:پژوهش در آموزش معارف و تربیت اسلامی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tarbiatmaaref.cfu.ac.ir/article_1614_dc8511cd39647469022114f8c54eec57.pdf
_version_ 1826576901322309632
author Akbar Panahi Darcheh
Masoumeh Pourrajab
Kolsoom Gholami Andrati
author_facet Akbar Panahi Darcheh
Masoumeh Pourrajab
Kolsoom Gholami Andrati
author_sort Akbar Panahi Darcheh
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of the present study is an analysis of the originality of “Islamic ethics”. Using descriptive analysis, this research reviews the viewpoint of the deniers of “Islamic ethics”. In this regard, the study is focused on the viewpoints of those who have refuted “Islamic ethics” as well as the ideas of Muslim thinkers who have concentrated on two keywords in morality, that is “virtue” and “justice”, as two effective components in compiling the structure of Islamic ethics. The results showed that some arguments raised by the deniers of Islamic ethics are somehow justifiable as they say that the ethical books throughout the history have been under the influence of Greek ethics (specially Plato and Aristotle) and that Aristotelian justice is more of a “social justice” type that begins with an “individual” and leads to the distribution of blessings, income, benefit, judgement, and arbitration. Furthermore, they say that ethical instructions in the verses and traditions are not coherent but they are scattered. Yet these arguments do not make us assume that valuable attempts of thinkers such as Ibn Miskawayh,Khāja Nasir Tūsī, Mullā Mihdī Narāqī and tens of other philosophers in compiling Islamic ethics are as a result of negligence to the indigenous belongings.
first_indexed 2025-03-14T13:37:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-42ffc1476ac642fabdebf2a5c08231b3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2783-2252
2783-2147
language fas
last_indexed 2025-03-14T13:37:57Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Farhangian University
record_format Article
series پژوهش در آموزش معارف و تربیت اسلامی
spelling doaj.art-42ffc1476ac642fabdebf2a5c08231b32025-02-28T05:31:41ZfasFarhangian Universityپژوهش در آموزش معارف و تربیت اسلامی2783-22522783-21472021-05-0112698910.22034/riet.2021.7915.10011614An Analysis of the Originality of “Islamic Ethics”Akbar Panahi Darcheh0Masoumeh Pourrajab1Kolsoom Gholami Andrati2Assistant Professor, Islamic Education, Department of Education, Farhangian University, Isfahan, IranPhD., Educational Sciences, Head of Research Department, Isfahan General Directorate of Education, Isfahan, Iran.Assistant Professor, Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Gorgan, Iran.The purpose of the present study is an analysis of the originality of “Islamic ethics”. Using descriptive analysis, this research reviews the viewpoint of the deniers of “Islamic ethics”. In this regard, the study is focused on the viewpoints of those who have refuted “Islamic ethics” as well as the ideas of Muslim thinkers who have concentrated on two keywords in morality, that is “virtue” and “justice”, as two effective components in compiling the structure of Islamic ethics. The results showed that some arguments raised by the deniers of Islamic ethics are somehow justifiable as they say that the ethical books throughout the history have been under the influence of Greek ethics (specially Plato and Aristotle) and that Aristotelian justice is more of a “social justice” type that begins with an “individual” and leads to the distribution of blessings, income, benefit, judgement, and arbitration. Furthermore, they say that ethical instructions in the verses and traditions are not coherent but they are scattered. Yet these arguments do not make us assume that valuable attempts of thinkers such as Ibn Miskawayh,Khāja Nasir Tūsī, Mullā Mihdī Narāqī and tens of other philosophers in compiling Islamic ethics are as a result of negligence to the indigenous belongings.https://tarbiatmaaref.cfu.ac.ir/article_1614_dc8511cd39647469022114f8c54eec57.pdfislamic ethicsaristotleethical philosophyvirtuejustice
spellingShingle Akbar Panahi Darcheh
Masoumeh Pourrajab
Kolsoom Gholami Andrati
An Analysis of the Originality of “Islamic Ethics”
پژوهش در آموزش معارف و تربیت اسلامی
islamic ethics
aristotle
ethical philosophy
virtue
justice
title An Analysis of the Originality of “Islamic Ethics”
title_full An Analysis of the Originality of “Islamic Ethics”
title_fullStr An Analysis of the Originality of “Islamic Ethics”
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of the Originality of “Islamic Ethics”
title_short An Analysis of the Originality of “Islamic Ethics”
title_sort analysis of the originality of islamic ethics
topic islamic ethics
aristotle
ethical philosophy
virtue
justice
url https://tarbiatmaaref.cfu.ac.ir/article_1614_dc8511cd39647469022114f8c54eec57.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT akbarpanahidarcheh ananalysisoftheoriginalityofislamicethics
AT masoumehpourrajab ananalysisoftheoriginalityofislamicethics
AT kolsoomgholamiandrati ananalysisoftheoriginalityofislamicethics
AT akbarpanahidarcheh analysisoftheoriginalityofislamicethics
AT masoumehpourrajab analysisoftheoriginalityofislamicethics
AT kolsoomgholamiandrati analysisoftheoriginalityofislamicethics